CodSpeed HQ / CodSpeed Performance Analysis
succeeded
Jul 16, 2026 in 0s
Performance Gate Passed
⚡ 16 improved benchmarks
✅ 1644 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 47 skipped benchmarks1
Performance Changes
Mode
Benchmark
BASE
HEAD
Efficiency
⚡
Simulation
take_filter_list_random_mask_sequential_indices[768, 50]
132.8 µs
93.7 µs
+41.73%
⚡
Simulation
take_filter_list_random_mask_sequential_indices[256, 50]
134 µs
96 µs
+39.51%
⚡
Simulation
list_sum_small
144.5 µs
108 µs
+33.79%
⚡
Simulation
list_i32_large
212.7 µs
171.2 µs
+24.22%
⚡
Simulation
take_filter_list_slice_mask_sequential_indices[768, 50]
116.3 µs
93.8 µs
+24.03%
⚡
Simulation
take_filter_list_slice_mask_sequential_indices[256, 50]
115.4 µs
94 µs
+22.75%
⚡
Simulation
take_filter_list_slice_mask_random_indices[256, 50]
136.4 µs
118.6 µs
+15.03%
⚡
Simulation
take_filter_list_slice_mask_random_indices[768, 50]
136.7 µs
119.2 µs
+14.67%
⚡
Simulation
take_filter_list_random_mask_random_indices[256, 50]
140.1 µs
122.2 µs
+14.63%
⚡
Simulation
take_filter_list_random_mask_random_indices[768, 50]
144 µs
125.9 µs
+14.4%
⚡
Simulation
take_filter_list_small_random_mask_random_indices[768, 10]
137 µs
119.9 µs
+14.23%
⚡
Simulation
take_filter_list_small_uncached_random_mask_random_indices[256, 10]
133.5 µs
117 µs
+14.11%
⚡
Simulation
take_filter_list_small_random_mask_random_indices[256, 10]
132.6 µs
116.4 µs
+13.93%
⚡
Simulation
take_filter_list_small_uncached_random_mask_random_indices[768, 10]
136.8 µs
120.2 µs
+13.86%
⚡
Simulation
take_filter_list_nullable_random_mask_random_indices[256, 50]
145.6 µs
129.3 µs
+12.67%
⚡
Simulation
take_filter_list_nullable_random_mask_random_indices[768, 50]
150.5 µs
133.8 µs
+12.51%
Tip
Curious why this is faster? Comment @codspeedbot explain why this is faster on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing rk/resetunchecked (676c05b ) with develop (f47bf54 )