Revert "Add extension constant pushdown rule and fix `InnerProduct` rule" #7520

Performance Regression: -23.81%

❌ 24 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1139 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 1457 skipped benchmarks¹

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

	Mode	Benchmark	`BASE`	`HEAD`	Efficiency
❌	Simulation	`take_search[(0.005, 0.05)]`	132 µs	168.7 µs	-21.75%
❌	Simulation	`take_search[(0.01, 0.1)]`	268.5 µs	341.6 µs	-21.4%
❌	Simulation	`take_search[(0.005, 1.0)]`	2.3 ms	3.1 ms	-23.81%
❌	Simulation	`take_search[(0.01, 0.05)]`	143 µs	179.7 µs	-20.42%
❌	Simulation	`take_search[(0.01, 0.5)]`	1.3 ms	1.6 ms	-22.22%
❌	Simulation	`take_search[(0.005, 0.1)]`	247.7 µs	320.8 µs	-22.79%
❌	Simulation	`take_search[(0.005, 0.5)]`	1.2 ms	1.5 ms	-23.68%
❌	Simulation	`take_search[(0.01, 1.0)]`	2.5 ms	3.3 ms	-22.34%
❌	Simulation	`take_search[(0.1, 0.5)]`	1.8 ms	2.2 ms	-16.94%
❌	Simulation	`take_search[(0.1, 0.1)]`	386 µs	459.1 µs	-15.92%
❌	Simulation	`take_search[(0.1, 1.0)]`	3.5 ms	4.3 ms	-17.1%
❌	Simulation	`take_search_chunked[(0.005, 1.0)]`	3.1 ms	3.7 ms	-16.78%
❌	Simulation	`take_search[(0.1, 0.05)]`	212.8 µs	249.5 µs	-14.71%
❌	Simulation	`take_search_chunked[(0.005, 0.1)]`	322.4 µs	384.4 µs	-16.15%
❌	Simulation	`take_search_chunked[(0.1, 1.0)]`	4.2 ms	4.9 ms	-12.73%
❌	Simulation	`take_search_chunked[(0.005, 0.5)]`	1.5 ms	1.9 ms	-16.7%
❌	Simulation	`take_search_chunked[(0.1, 0.05)]`	248.9 µs	279.9 µs	-11.1%
❌	Simulation	`take_search_chunked[(0.01, 0.05)]`	182.8 µs	213.9 µs	-14.54%
❌	Simulation	`take_search_chunked[(0.1, 0.5)]`	2.1 ms	2.4 ms	-12.63%
❌	Simulation	`take_search_chunked[(0.005, 0.05)]`	169.9 µs	201 µs	-15.49%
...	...	...	...	...	...

ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.

_{Comparing revert-7507-ct/extension-constant (2f9a5e2) with develop (4d73f97)}

1457 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩