Skip to content

Faster implicitlyUsesParseTree, implicitlyUsesLayoutOrLexical, and usesOrExtendsADT - #2853

Open
sungshik wants to merge 1 commit into
performance-improvements-mainfrom
performance-improvements/faster-usesorextendsadt
Open

Faster implicitlyUsesParseTree, implicitlyUsesLayoutOrLexical, and usesOrExtendsADT#2853
sungshik wants to merge 1 commit into
performance-improvements-mainfrom
performance-improvements/faster-usesorextendsadt

Conversation

@sungshik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

…sentation for later use in `implicitlyUsesParseTree`, `implicitlyUsesLayoutOrLexical`, and `usesOrExtendsADT`
@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 45%. Comparing base (ebf322d) to head (5bb6899).

Additional details and impacted files
@@                       Coverage Diff                       @@
##             performance-improvements-main   #2853   +/-   ##
===============================================================
- Coverage                               45%     45%   -1%     
  Complexity                            6722    6722           
===============================================================
  Files                                  841     841           
  Lines                                67060   67060           
  Branches                             10016   10016           
===============================================================
- Hits                                 30790   30788    -2     
  Misses                               33886   33886           
- Partials                              2384    2386    +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@sungshik
sungshik marked this pull request as ready for review August 18, 2026 11:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant