Skip to content

Performance improvements typechecker - #2849

Draft
sungshik wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
performance-improvements-main
Draft

Performance improvements typechecker#2849
sungshik wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
performance-improvements-main

Conversation

@sungshik

@sungshik sungshik commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR introduces various performance improvements to the typechecker. Each improvement is contributed in a separate sub-PR. This PR is a companion of usethesource/typepal#54.

Sub-PRs:

Integration test: ...

TODO:

  • Remove scaffolding
  • Await integration test

@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 40 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 45%. Comparing base (4fd769b) to head (ebf322d).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/org/rascalmpl/interpreter/utils/Profiler.java 0% 40 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              main   #2849   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage       45%     45%           
- Complexity    6710    6722   +12     
=======================================
  Files          841     841           
  Lines        67020   67060   +40     
  Branches     10012   10016    +4     
=======================================
+ Hits         30762   30790   +28     
- Misses       33874   33886   +12     
  Partials      2384    2384           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant