i18n(ja): keep the literal information_schema identifier in table-page summaries - #23619
i18n(ja): keep the literal information_schema identifier in table-page summaries#23619yahonda wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
…e summaries Fixes 5 information-schema/*.md summary lines where the literal schema identifier `information_schema` (matching the `USE information_schema;` statement shown in each page's example code) had been translated to "情報スキーマ" instead of kept literal, unlike the other 57 pages in the same directory which already keep it correctly.
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (5)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 4 included reviews per hour; 1 remains after this review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughFive information schema documentation summaries replace the Japanese term 「情報スキーマテーブル」 with 「information_schemaテーブル」. No public declarations or functional behavior changed. ChangesInformation Schema Documentation
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to This documentation-only change corrects five Japanese summaries to preserve the literal information_schema identifier. It is localized and introduces no actionable merge-blocking risk beyond normal checks and review. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Full details: Docstring CoverageExplanation No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (5 skipped: 5 unsupported.) Full details: Description checkExplanation The description explains the five affected files, the reason for the corrections, the applicable documentation version, related review context, AI involvement, and intentionally excluded scope. Required sections are present and sufficiently complete. ✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1🛠️ Fix failing CI checks 💡
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
… menus Fixes 5 TOC*.md left-nav category headings that translated the literal schema name INFORMATION_SCHEMA as 情報スキーマ, unlike their sibling category "`mysql`スキーマ" which correctly keeps mysql literal.
What is changed, added or deleted? (Required)
Found while checking for
information_schemamistranslations: 5information-schema/*.mdsummary lines translate the literal, lowercase schema identifierinformation_schema(matching theUSE information_schema;statement shown in each page's own example code block) as "情報スキーマ" instead of keeping it literal. The other 57 pages in the same directory already keep it correctly (e.g.COLUMNS` INFORMATION_SCHEMA テーブルについて学習します。), so these 5 were outliers.Fixed:
information-schema/information-schema-analyze-status.mdinformation-schema/information-schema-resource-groups.mdinformation-schema/information-schema-placement-policies.mdinformation-schema/information-schema-tidb-hot-regions-history.mdinformation-schema/information-schema-tikv-region-status.mdNote: the general translation "情報スキーマ" for the Information Schema feature/concept name (e.g.
information-schema/information-schema.md's own H1) is correct and separate from this — only the literal lowercaseinformation_schemaidentifier in these 5 summaries was wrong. A separate, much larger pre-existing issue (a missing opening backtick before the table name in ~58 of the 62 summary lines in this directory) was found in the same pass and is intentionally left out of this PR per the user's request to handle it separately.Which TiDB version(s) do your changes apply to? (Required)
What is the related PR or file link(s)?
AI agent involvement
Do your changes match any of the following descriptions?
Summary by CodeRabbit
information_schematable name for several Information Schema references.