i18n(ja): restore missing opening backtick in information-schema summaries - #23620
i18n(ja): restore missing opening backtick in information-schema summaries#23620yahonda wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
…aries Fixes 58 information-schema/*.md summary lines where the opening backtick before the table name was dropped (a legacy MT artifact), e.g. "COLUMNS` INFORMATION_SCHEMA..." -> "`COLUMNS` INFORMATION_SCHEMA...", matching the English source's `TABLE_NAME` code span. Each fix was cross-checked against the page's own title: frontmatter field before applying.
ti-chi-bot
Bot
added
the
missing-translation-status
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
ti-chi-bot
Bot
added
the
size/L
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (58)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 4 included reviews per hour; 0 remain after this review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe change corrects front-matter summaries in information schema documentation. Table names now use consistent inline-code formatting. Several summaries also receive minor wording corrections. ChangesInformation schema summary metadata
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to This PR restores missing inline-code formatting in Japanese information-schema summaries without changing product behavior. No actionable merge-blocking risk remains beyond normal checks and review. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Full details: Docstring CoverageExplanation No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (58 skipped: 58 unsupported.) Full details: Description checkExplanation The description explains what changed, why it changed, the affected documentation version, related references, AI involvement, and change classifications. The conditional first-time contributor checklist is omitted appropriately. ✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1🛠️ Fix failing CI checks 💡
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
1 participant
What is changed, added or deleted? (Required)
Found while checking
information-schema/*.mdpages for a different mistranslation (#23619): 58 of the 62 pages'summary:frontmatter lines are missing the opening backtick before the table name, e.g.COLUMNS` INFORMATION_SCHEMA テーブルについて学習します。should be`COLUMNS` INFORMATION_SCHEMA テーブルについて学習します。(matching the English source'sLearn the `COLUMNS` INFORMATION_SCHEMA table.). This is a legacy machine-translation artifact (dropped code-span marker), the same class already tracked for other parts of the corpus.Each of the 58 lines was reconstructed by inserting the missing backtick and cross-checked against the page's own
title:frontmatter field (which always equals the table name) before applying, so this is a mechanical, verified fix — not a blind regex replace.Which TiDB version(s) do your changes apply to? (Required)
What is the related PR or file link(s)?
AI agent involvement
Do your changes match any of the following descriptions?
Summary by CodeRabbit
DATA_LOCK_WAITS,DEADLOCKS, andUSER_ATTRIBUTES.