-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 486
TODO Cleanup #6509
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
TODO Cleanup #6509
Changes from all commits
773f26c
6a3cfe4
4d7afaa
6428ce4
8af6a3f
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -305,7 +305,6 @@ private ScanServerData binRanges(ClientTabletCache clientTabletCache, List<Range | |
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (retryCountDownTimer.isExpired()) { | ||
| // TODO exception used for timeout is inconsistent | ||
| throw new TimedOutException( | ||
| "Failed to find servers to process scans before timeout was exceeded."); | ||
| } | ||
|
Comment on lines
307
to
310
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Removed this TODO for now. The exception used here seems consistent with what is happening: TimedOutException because the retryCountDownTimer has expired. If anything, the message may not be accurate description of why the timeout happened. I can add it back if the todo should remain, or if a different exception/message should be used here, I can replace. |
||
|
|
||
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Attaching comment from issue discussing the relevance of this TODO. It looks like it is no longer relevant but could use @ctubbsii opinion.
#2699 (comment)