Skip to content

docs(rev): split REV-02 lifecycle alignment#147

Merged
abiorh-claw merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
codex/ws-rev-001-02
Jul 18, 2026
Merged

docs(rev): split REV-02 lifecycle alignment#147
abiorh-claw merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
codex/ws-rev-001-02

Conversation

@Abiorh001

@Abiorh001 Abiorh001 commented Jul 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Workstream PR Trust Bundle

Chunk

WS-REV-001-02 - Locked Review Policy And Task Lifecycle Alignment

Merge intent: .agent-loop/merge-intents/WS-REV-001-02.json

Goal

Split the blocked parent REV-02 persistence boundary into independently reviewable planning chunks without implementing against AUTH-owned contributor or ActorProfile schema.

Human-Approved Intent

  • Intent: .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-REV-001-review-revision-lifecycle/INTENT.md
  • Chunk contract: .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-REV-001-review-revision-lifecycle/chunks/WS-REV-001-02-review-policy-task-alignment.md

What Changed

  • converted parent WS-REV-001-02 into a non-executable split record;
  • defined 02A guide chronology, 02B policy/dormant lifecycle, and 02C Submission lineage contracts;
  • added future migration, direct-SQL, concurrency, rollback, active-human, and immutability test design;
  • corrected D6 ownership in 09A and conformance ownership;
  • added exactly one schema-v2 merge intent naming 02A with explicit start required.

Why It Changed

AUTH owns migration 0026, the contributor-field clean cut, and database-backed ActorProfile human lineage. Implementing REV-02 persistence before those foundations merge would create migration conflicts and rework. The original parent also crossed three L1 persistence boundaries and required a circuit-breaker split.

Design Chosen

Parent 02 records the split and stops. 02A, 02B, and 02C remain separately started successor chunks in dependency order. No runtime or migration work is included.

Alternatives Rejected

  • Implement against retired contributor identity fields: conflicts with AUTH ownership and creates rework.
  • Keep one combined runtime chunk: exceeds a reviewable L1 migration boundary.
  • Reserve a REV migration identifier now: conflicts with the then-current-head rule.

Scope Control

Allowed Files Changed

  • REV initiative plans, decisions, risks, status, conformance, chunk contracts, and test design;
  • REV internal/external review evidence and PR trust bundle;
  • one WS-REV-001-02 schema-v2 merge intent.

Files Outside Contract

  • None.

Product Behavior

  • No Workstream product behavior changed.
  • Product behavior changed and is explained here:

Evidence

Commands Run

python3 scripts/check_internal_review_evidence.py
python3 scripts/update_post_merge_memory.py validate-merge-intent --base-ref origin/main
python3 scripts/check_markdown_links.py
python3 scripts/check_stale_workstream_wording.py
python3 scripts/check_stale_authorization_docs.py
python3 scripts/check_stale_artifact_contracts.py
python3 scripts/check_stale_review_contracts.py
PYTEST_DISABLE_PLUGIN_AUTOLOAD=1 backend/.venv/bin/python scripts/test_agent_gates.py
git diff --check

Result Summary

Internal review evidence: PASS
Merge intent: PASS
Markdown links: PASS
Stale contract scanners: PASS
Agent gates: 87 passed
Diff integrity: PASS
GitHub Agent Gates: PASS
GitHub Backend: PASS (20m29s)

Acceptance Criteria Proof

  • Parent 02 is non-executable and adds no runtime or migration.
  • Child boundaries and dependency order are explicit.
  • AUTH retains contributor and ActorProfile schema ownership.
  • Future proof covers migration refusal, direct SQL, races, rollback, lineage, and immutability.
  • Exactly one merge intent names 02A and requires a separate explicit start.

Test Delta

Tests Added

  • None; this is planning and future test design only.

Tests Modified

  • None.

Tests Removed Or Skipped

  • None.

Internal Reviewer Results

Reviewed code SHA: 4b00cd3a7c0886f3fa0e6cf4b4b280aa58bc1a10

Reviewed at: 2026-07-18T12:19:40Z

Reviewer run IDs: /root/rev01_senior_arch_reuse@4b00cd3a7c0886f3fa0e6cf4b4b280aa58bc1a10, WS-REV-001-02/qa-product-test-delta/rebind-4b00cd3-20260718, WS-REV-001-02/security-docs-ci/4b00cd3a/2026-07-18T12:19:40Z

Reviewer Result Blocking Findings Notes
Senior engineering PASS AFTER FIXES None Split and stop condition verified.
QA/test PASS AFTER FIXES None Future proof matrix verified.
Security/auth PASS AFTER FIXES None AUTH ownership remains fail-closed.
Product/ops PASS None v0.1 lifecycle semantics preserved.
Architecture PASS AFTER FIXES None Three persistence boundaries are separated.
CI integrity PASS AFTER FIXES None Evidence contract and gates pass.
Docs PASS AFTER FIXES None Authority, blockers, and start gates are explicit.
Reuse/dedup PASS None Existing lifecycle boundaries remain canonical.
Test delta PASS None No executable test or gate weakening.

External Review

External review response file:

  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-REV-001-review-revision-lifecycle/reviews/WS-REV-001-02-external-review-response.md
Source Status Notes
CodeRabbit PASS Final-head rerun completed; the lineage thread is resolved in e10575b.
GitHub checks PASS Backend (21m30s) and Agent Gates passed on final head e10575b.

CI And Gate Integrity

  • No workflow weakening.
  • No lint/test/docstring gate weakening.
  • No coverage threshold weakening.
  • No package script weakening.
  • No unpinned new GitHub Action.
  • Checkout credential persistence disabled where checkout is used.

Remaining Risks

  • AUTH dependency timing may move the future migration head; REV reserves no identifier.
  • Historical attribution or guide context may be ambiguous; future migrations must fail for remediation rather than guess.
  • Preference and lease-duration defaults remain human decisions before 02B.

Follow-Up Work

  • Merge AUTH-09D-A.
  • Merge the AUTH-owned contributor-field/canonical-human foundation from the then-current migration head.
  • Start WS-REV-001-02A only after a separate explicit human instruction.

Human Review Focus

Please inspect:

  • the 02A -> 02B -> 02C split and dependency order;
  • AUTH ownership of contributor and canonical-human schema;
  • dormant terminal states and absence of synthetic Review/reject behavior;
  • unresolved duration defaults before 02B.

Human Merge Ownership

  • I can explain what changed.
  • I can explain why it changed.
  • I know what could break.
  • I accept the remaining risks.
  • The user explicitly approved this specific PR for merge.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

WS-REV-001 parent chunk 02 is converted into a non-executable split record with child planning contracts 02A, 02B, and 02C. Documentation updates align dependencies, ownership, policy constraints, verification design, review evidence, and runtime start conditions.

Changes

Review revision lifecycle

Layer / File(s) Summary
Lifecycle map and governance updates
.agent-loop/initiatives/WS-REV-001-review-revision-lifecycle/{CHUNK_MAP.md,CONFORMANCE_MATRIX.md,DECISIONS.md,DISCOVERY.md,PLAN.md,REVIEW_LOG.md,RISKS.md,STATUS.md}
The lifecycle documentation now records the 02A-02C split, AUTH-owned prerequisites, updated conformance ownership, explicit human defaults, and revised stop conditions.
Parent 02 split contract
.agent-loop/initiatives/WS-REV-001-review-revision-lifecycle/chunks/WS-REV-001-02-review-policy-task-alignment.md, .agent-loop/merge-intents/WS-REV-001-02.json
Parent 02 is defined as non-executable, with child boundaries, dependency ordering, preserved ownership, planning proof, and explicit-start metadata.
Child chunk behavior contracts
.agent-loop/initiatives/WS-REV-001-review-revision-lifecycle/chunks/WS-REV-001-02{A,B,C}-*.md
New contracts define guide activation and publication locking, dormant policy/task compatibility, and immutable submission attribution and lineage.
Verification design and revision boundaries
.agent-loop/initiatives/WS-REV-001-review-revision-lifecycle/TEST_DESIGN_WS-REV-001-02.md, .../chunks/WS-REV-001-09A-revision-context-resubmission.md
Planning-only verification coverage is specified for migrations, SQL constraints, concurrency, lifecycle dormancy, lineage immutability, regression scope, human defaults, and revision-limit failures.
Planning review evidence
.agent-loop/initiatives/WS-REV-001-review-revision-lifecycle/reviews/*
Internal review evidence and the trust bundle record review outcomes, repaired findings, deterministic checks, remaining gates, and runtime implementation prohibition.

Estimated code review effort: 3 (Moderate) | ~20 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers: abiorh-claw

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and concisely summarizes the main change: splitting REV-02 lifecycle alignment.
Description check ✅ Passed The description covers the required trust-bundle sections and includes intent, scope, evidence, reviewers, risks, and follow-up details.
✨ Finishing Touches
📝 Generate docstrings
  • Create stacked PR
  • Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch codex/ws-rev-001-02

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@Abiorh001
Abiorh001 marked this pull request as ready for review July 18, 2026 12:31

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In
@.agent-loop/initiatives/WS-REV-001-review-revision-lifecycle/reviews/WS-REV-001-02-internal-review-evidence.md:
- Around line 5-22: Update the reviewed revision evidence to explicitly link the
planning candidate SHA 0292825a52f884f42d82e1522637f2ff2bf4bb7a to the
reviewer-run SHA 4b00cd3a7c0886f3fa0e6cf4b4b280aa58bc1a10, or rerun all recorded
reviewer evidence against the final reviewed head. Ensure the PASS disposition
relies only on evidence bound to the exact reviewed candidate and document the
resulting lineage in the revision evidence.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 5e37295b-e72c-48dd-ad5f-fd4da1b00534

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b2b9016 and 2187a1e.

📒 Files selected for processing (17)
  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-REV-001-review-revision-lifecycle/CHUNK_MAP.md
  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-REV-001-review-revision-lifecycle/CONFORMANCE_MATRIX.md
  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-REV-001-review-revision-lifecycle/DECISIONS.md
  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-REV-001-review-revision-lifecycle/DISCOVERY.md
  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-REV-001-review-revision-lifecycle/PLAN.md
  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-REV-001-review-revision-lifecycle/REVIEW_LOG.md
  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-REV-001-review-revision-lifecycle/RISKS.md
  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-REV-001-review-revision-lifecycle/STATUS.md
  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-REV-001-review-revision-lifecycle/TEST_DESIGN_WS-REV-001-02.md
  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-REV-001-review-revision-lifecycle/chunks/WS-REV-001-02-review-policy-task-alignment.md
  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-REV-001-review-revision-lifecycle/chunks/WS-REV-001-02A-guide-activation-sequence.md
  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-REV-001-review-revision-lifecycle/chunks/WS-REV-001-02B-review-policy-task-lifecycle.md
  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-REV-001-review-revision-lifecycle/chunks/WS-REV-001-02C-submission-attribution-lineage.md
  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-REV-001-review-revision-lifecycle/chunks/WS-REV-001-09A-revision-context-resubmission.md
  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-REV-001-review-revision-lifecycle/reviews/WS-REV-001-02-internal-review-evidence.md
  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-REV-001-review-revision-lifecycle/reviews/WS-REV-001-02-pr-trust-bundle.md
  • .agent-loop/merge-intents/WS-REV-001-02.json

@abiorh-claw
abiorh-claw self-requested a review July 18, 2026 14:08
@abiorh-claw
abiorh-claw merged commit f18b620 into main Jul 18, 2026
9 checks passed
@abiorh-claw
abiorh-claw deleted the codex/ws-rev-001-02 branch July 18, 2026 14:11
github-actions Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 18, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants