π¨ Palette: μμ΄μ½ λ²νΌ μ κ·Όμ± κ°μ (aria-hidden μΆκ°) - #330
π¨ Palette: μμ΄μ½ λ²νΌ μ κ·Όμ± κ°μ (aria-hidden μΆκ°)#330seonghobae wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
|
π Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a π emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. π βΉοΈ Recent review infoβοΈ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: π Files selected for processing (1)
π§ Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
π WalkthroughWalkthroughλμ보λμ κ³΅ν΅ UIμ μκ° μ μ© Chevron μμ΄μ½μ Changesμ₯μμ© μμ΄μ½ μ κ·Όμ±
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes π₯ Pre-merge checks | β 5β Passed checks (5 passed)
β¨ Finishing Touchesπ Generate docstrings
π§ͺ Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
λμ보λ/κ³΅μ© UI μ»΄ν¬λνΈμμ μλ―Έ μ λ¬μ΄ νμ μλ Chevron μμ΄μ½μ μ€ν¬λ¦° 리λκ° μ½μ§ μλλ‘ aria-hidden="true"λ₯Ό μΆκ°ν μ κ·Όμ± κ°μ PRμ
λλ€. λ²νΌ/λ§ν¬μ μ κ·Ό κ°λ₯ν μ΄λ¦(ν
μ€νΈ λλ aria-label)μ μ μ§νλ©΄μ, μ₯μμ© μμ΄μ½ λλ
μΌλ‘ μΈν λ
Έμ΄μ¦λ₯Ό μ€μ΄λ λ³κ²½μ
λλ€.
Changes:
- Select νΈλ¦¬κ±° λ° μ€ν¬λ‘€ νμ΄νμ Chevron μμ΄μ½μ
aria-hidden="true"μΆκ° - Pagination μ΄μ /λ€μ λ²νΌ λ΄λΆ μμ΄μ½μ
aria-hidden="true"μΆκ° - 리ν¬νΈ/μ΄λ²€νΈ 리μ€νΈ λ΄ λ€λΉκ²μ΄μ
μ© Chevron μμ΄μ½μ
aria-hidden="true"μΆκ°
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 5 out of 5 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| packages/web/src/components/ui/select.tsx | Select νΈλ¦¬κ±° λ° μ€ν¬λ‘€ νμ΄ν Chevron μμ΄μ½μ μ₯μμ©μΌλ‘ μ²λ¦¬νλλ‘ aria-hidden μΆκ° |
| packages/web/src/components/ui/pagination.tsx | μ΄μ /λ€μ νμ΄μ§ λ²νΌμ Chevron μμ΄μ½μ aria-hidden μΆκ°(λ²νΌμ aria-labelλ‘ μλ―Έ μ μ§) |
| packages/web/src/components/dashboard/reports/week-navigator.tsx | μ΄μ /λ€μ μ£Ό λ§ν¬μ Chevron μμ΄μ½μ aria-hidden μΆκ°(λ§ν¬λ aria-labelλ‘ μλ―Έ μ μ§) |
| packages/web/src/components/dashboard/reports/context-section.tsx | ν κΈ μΉμ
λ²νΌμ μν μμ΄μ½(ChevronUp/Down)μ μ₯μμ©μΌλ‘ μ²λ¦¬νλλ‘ aria-hidden μΆκ° |
| packages/web/src/components/dashboard/event-list.tsx | ν νμ₯ νμμ© Chevron μμ΄μ½μ aria-hidden μΆκ°(ν λ²νΌμ ν
μ€νΈλ‘ μλ―Έ μ μ§) |
π‘ Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
β¦-10963810048510945625
![opencode-agent[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1549082?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.
Review outcome
1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
-
Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was
failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head. -
Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.
-
Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports
successwith required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence. -
Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking
needs.coverage-evidence.result == successbefore posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present. -
Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
-
Reason: coverage-evidence result was
failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head46468b88a0361efb28f6ee726b6c811b4e546245. -
Head SHA:
46468b88a0361efb28f6ee726b6c811b4e546245 -
Workflow run: 31036861956
-
Workflow attempt: 1
Coverage evidence
Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (5 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (5 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
OpenCode Review Overview
Pull request overviewOpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass. Review outcome1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
Coverage evidenceCoverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence. Changed-File Evidence Mapflowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (5 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (5 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
|
π‘ What: μ€ν¬λ¦° 리λμμ μ₯μμ© μμ΄μ½μ μ½μ§ μλλ‘ μ¬λ¬ μ»΄ν¬λνΈμ Chevron μμ΄μ½μ
aria-hidden="true"μμ±μ μΆκ°νμ΅λλ€.π― Why: μμ΄μ½ μμ²΄κ° μλ―Έλ₯Ό κ°μ§ μκ±°λ μ΄λ―Έ λ²νΌ λ±μ μν΄ μλ―Έκ° μ λ¬λλ κ²½μ°, μ€ν¬λ¦° 리λκ° λΆνμνκ² μμ΄μ½ μ΄λ¦μ μ½μ΄ μ¬μ©μ±μ μ νμν€λ κ²μ λ°©μ§ν©λλ€.
πΈ Before/After: μκ°μ μΈ λ³νλ μμ΅λλ€. (μ κ·Όμ± κ°μ )
βΏ Accessibility: μ€ν¬λ¦° 리λ μ¬μ©μμ λ Έμ΄μ¦ κ°μ.
PR created automatically by Jules for task 10963810048510945625 started by @seonghobae
Summary by CodeRabbit