🎨 Palette: [접근성] 장식용 아이콘의 스크린 리더 중복 읽힘 방지 (aria-hidden 추가)

[seonghobae]

💡 What: copy-prompt-button.tsx와 pagination.tsx에 있는 장식용 아이콘들에 aria-hidden="true" 속성을 추가했습니다.
🎯 Why: aria-label이나 옆에 있는 텍스트를 통해 의미가 명확하게 전달되는 대화형 요소(버튼)의 내부에 아이콘이 있을 경우, 아이콘 자체가 스크린 리더에서 읽히면 사용자에게 불필요한 정보가 중복으로 전달되어 혼란을 줄 수 있기 때문입니다.
📸 Before/After: 시각적인 변경 사항은 없으며, 순수하게 스크린 리더 및 접근성 개선을 위한 시맨틱 수정입니다. (Playwright를 통해 렌더링에 변화가 없음을 검증 완료했습니다.)
♿ Accessibility: 스크린 리더 사용자가 해당 요소에 포커스를 맞출 때 보다 명확하고 깔끔하게 정보를 전달받을 수 있도록 개선했습니다. (예: "이전 페이지" 라고 한 번만 안내됩니다.)

---

PR created automatically by Jules for task 2247317662011856888 started by @seonghobae

Summary by CodeRabbit

• 접근성 개선
  • 스크린 리더가 버튼의 아이콘 설명을 중복해서 읽지 않도록 개선했습니다.
  • 복사 및 페이지 이동 버튼의 아이콘이 접근성 레이블과 충돌하지 않도록 조정했습니다.
• 문서
  • 아이콘에 대한 접근성 처리 가이드를 추가했습니다.

[google-labs-jules]

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

---

For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 868b2742-c6b9-4290-bfed-18e7ee789a0c

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9ef092b and 1ea5d61.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

• .jules/palette.md
• packages/web/src/components/copy-prompt-button.tsx
• packages/web/src/components/ui/pagination.tsx

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

버튼과 페이지네이션의 설명 가능한 아이콘에 aria-hidden="true"를 추가하고, 중복된 스크린 리더 읽기를 방지하는 접근성 지침을 기록했습니다.

Changes

아이콘 접근성 개선

Layer / File(s)	Summary
설명 가능한 아이콘의 보조 기술 숨김 .jules/palette.md, packages/web/src/components/copy-prompt-button.tsx, packages/web/src/components/ui/pagination.tsx	복사 버튼과 이전·다음 페이지 아이콘에 aria-hidden="true"를 추가하고 적용 지침을 문서화했습니다.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• ContextualWisdomLab/argos#324: 장식용 내비게이션 아이콘에 aria-hidden="true"를 추가한 접근성 변경입니다.
• ContextualWisdomLab/argos#330: 장식용 버튼 아이콘에 동일한 속성을 추가했으며 페이지네이션 컴포넌트와 직접 겹칩니다.
• ContextualWisdomLab/argos#341: 접근 가능한 인터랙티브 요소 내부 아이콘과 관련 지침을 수정한 변경입니다.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	접근성 장식용 아이콘에 aria-hidden을 추가해 스크린 리더의 중복 읽기를 방지하는 변경 사항을 정확히 설명합니다.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1

🛠️ Fix failing CI checks 💡

• Fix failing CI checks

📝 Generate docstrings

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch palette/a11y-hidden-icons-2247317662011856888

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[opencode-agent]

Pull request overview

OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.

Review outcome

1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence

• Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head.

• Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.

• Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports success with required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence.

• Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking needs.coverage-evidence.result == success before posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present.

• Result: REQUEST_CHANGES

• Reason: coverage-evidence result was failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head 5fdeb0a586562de18b522e4166924bc8a6169856.

• Head SHA: 5fdeb0a586562de18b522e4166924bc8a6169856

• Workflow run: 31053977737

• Workflow attempt: 1

Coverage evidence

Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Changed file (3 files)"]
  S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
  I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (3 files)"]
  R1 --> V1["required checks"]

Loading

[opencode-agent]

OpenCode Review Overview

• Head SHA: a6a8c27b99908202211810d9e9903dfd53a3b9bd
• Workflow run: 31061813708
• Workflow attempt: 1
• Gate result: REQUEST_CHANGES (approval step)

Pull request overview

OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.

Review outcome

1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence

• Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head.

• Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.

• Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports success with required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence.

• Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking needs.coverage-evidence.result == success before posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present.

• Result: REQUEST_CHANGES

• Reason: coverage-evidence result was failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head a6a8c27b99908202211810d9e9903dfd53a3b9bd.

• Head SHA: a6a8c27b99908202211810d9e9903dfd53a3b9bd

• Workflow run: 31061813708

• Workflow attempt: 1

Coverage evidence

Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Changed file (3 files)"]
  S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
  I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (3 files)"]
  R1 --> V1["required checks"]

Loading

[opencode-agent]

Pull request overview

OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.

Review outcome

1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence

• Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head.

• Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.

• Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports success with required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence.

• Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking needs.coverage-evidence.result == success before posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present.

• Result: REQUEST_CHANGES

• Reason: coverage-evidence result was failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head bca11b14efeb64282b4dfc8af2794e00278cb93a.

• Head SHA: bca11b14efeb64282b4dfc8af2794e00278cb93a

• Workflow run: 31057176567

• Workflow attempt: 1

Coverage evidence

Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Changed file (29 files)"]
  S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
  I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (29 files)"]
  R1 --> V1["required checks"]
  Evidence --> S2["Docs (3 files)"]
  S2 --> I2["operator or user guidance"]
  I2 --> R2["Review risk: Docs (3 files)"]
  R2 --> V2["docs review"]

Loading

[opencode-agent]

Pull request overview

OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.

Review outcome

1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence

• Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head.

• Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.

• Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports success with required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence.

• Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking needs.coverage-evidence.result == success before posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present.

• Result: REQUEST_CHANGES

• Reason: coverage-evidence result was failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head a6a8c27b99908202211810d9e9903dfd53a3b9bd.

• Head SHA: a6a8c27b99908202211810d9e9903dfd53a3b9bd

• Workflow run: 31061813708

• Workflow attempt: 1

Coverage evidence

Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Changed file (3 files)"]
  S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
  I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (3 files)"]
  R1 --> V1["required checks"]

Loading

[seonghobae]

Closing as superseded by the consolidated non-overlapping coverage in #376 and #330. The exact-head CopyPromptButton change is already present in #376, while both pagination icon changes are already present in #330. Keeping this mixed duplicate open would create competing writes and stale-head check cancellations across both canonical branches.

[google-labs-jules]

Closing as superseded by the consolidated non-overlapping coverage in #376 and #330. The exact-head CopyPromptButton change is already present in #376, while both pagination icon changes are already present in #330. Keeping this mixed duplicate open would create competing writes and stale-head check cancellations across both canonical branches.

Understood. Acknowledging that this work is now obsolete and stopping work on this task.