fix(automation): replay isolated review-agent queues on current main

.github/workflows/agent-mention-router.yml

@@ -6,10 +6,6 @@ on:
   schedule:
     - cron: "*/5 * * * *"
 
-concurrency:
-  group: review-agent-mention-router-${{ github.repository }}
-  cancel-in-progress: false
-
 # Organization required-workflow rules do not propagate issue_comment events
 # into sibling repositories. Keep the workflow default read-only; each bounded
 # job declares only the writes it actually needs.
@@ -28,6 +24,9 @@ jobs:
         contains(github.event.comment.body, '@cwl-noema-review')
         || contains(github.event.comment.body, '@opencode-agent')
       )
+    concurrency:
+      group: review-agent-mention-router-local-${{ github.repository }}
+      queue: max
     runs-on: ubuntu-24.04
     timeout-minutes: 5
     permissions:
@@ -70,6 +69,9 @@ jobs:
     if: >-
       github.repository == 'ContextualWisdomLab/.github'
       && github.event_name == 'schedule'
+    concurrency:
+      group: review-agent-mention-router-sweep-${{ github.repository }}
+      cancel-in-progress: false
     runs-on: ubuntu-24.04
     timeout-minutes: 15
     permissions:

CHANGELOG.md

@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ Semantic Versioning where the repository publishes a release.
 
 ### Fixed
 
+- Isolated trusted interactive review-agent mentions from scheduled organization sweeps with separate job-level concurrency groups; interactive requests use the bounded 100-pending `queue: max` contract while sweeps retain non-cancelling single-pending coalescing, leaving the durable exact-name artifact ledger as forwarding authority.
 - Bounded the Strix quality self-test's deterministic timeout fixtures to 3-second process and 5-second fake-sleep budgets so exact-head policy evidence completes inside the existing job limit without changing production Strix scanner timeouts, providers, credentials, or review semantics.
 - Allowed commas and ASCII parentheses in the bounded Strix changed-file path policy so legal tracked Packrat fixtures can receive exact-head security analysis, while rejecting raw `..` components before normalization and keeping controls, backslashes, whitespace ambiguity, and shell punctuation fail-closed.
 - Bound each review-agent invocation key to the wrapper's complete canonical payload, including the base branch and requesting actor; altered fields with a valid-format key now fail before durable-leader election or forwarding, and wrapper write permission is job-scoped.

docs/doctoring/agent-mention-concurrency-isolation.md

@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
+# Review-agent mention concurrency isolation
+
+검토 기준일: **2026-08-07**
+
+## Incident
+
+Trusted `@cwl-noema-review` and review-only `@opencode-agent` comments can remain unacknowledged even though the protected-default-branch router is enabled. The failure occurs before model execution: the central workflow mixes two event classes in one workflow-level concurrency group.
+
+- interactive `issue_comment` routing has a five-minute job timeout;
+- the organization-wide sweep is scheduled every five minutes and has a fifteen-minute job timeout.
+
+GitHub Actions documents that a concurrency group permits one running member. With the default `queue: single`, at most one additional run can be pending; a newer queued run replaces the existing pending run even when `cancel-in-progress` is false. A scheduled sweep can therefore replace a pending trusted comment before exact-head resolution, durable ledger claim, dispatch, or acknowledgement.
+
+This is a queue-configuration defect, not evidence that the model, credential, allowlist, or review result is invalid.
+
+## Fail-first evidence
+
+Direct-main replacement PR #825 starts from protected `main` `1131b1bbafb24e455fc8619cdf316813e8721861`. Exact RED head `a319d513a2f67b707737651a9eb7fdbfe4bc23c4` changed only `tests/test_agent_mention_workflow_contract.py` and required separate job-scoped queue contracts while the inherited workflow still had one shared workflow-level group.
+
+This replacement does not reuse predecessor PR #815 or stacked development PR #824 checks, reviews, approvals, or mergeability evidence.
+
+## Decision
+
+Move concurrency from the workflow to the two jobs and give each event class a separate group.
+
+```yaml
+route-local-agent-mention:
+  concurrency:
+    group: review-agent-mention-router-local-${{ github.repository }}
+    queue: max
+
+sweep-organization-agent-mentions:
+  concurrency:
+    group: review-agent-mention-router-sweep-${{ github.repository }}
+    cancel-in-progress: false
+```
+
+GitHub currently documents `queue: max` as allowing up to 100 pending jobs or workflow runs in a concurrency group. Waiting members are processed serially; runs beyond the queue limit are rejected. GitHub also documents that `queue: max` cannot be combined with `cancel-in-progress: true`.
+
+The interactive route therefore retains every bounded pending trusted comment up to the platform queue limit instead of replacing the previous pending request. The sweep keeps the default single-pending behavior: a running sweep is not interrupted, but obsolete pending sweeps may coalesce. Local routes and scheduled sweeps use different concurrency groups, so scheduled work cannot replace interactive work.
+
+Concurrency is not the durable idempotency authority. Duplicate forwarding remains governed by the canonical invocation key, exact-key downstream concurrency, and immutable exact-name Actions artifact ledger written before authoritative forwarding.
+
+## Data and authority flow
+
+```mermaid
+sequenceDiagram
+    participant M as Trusted maintainer
+    participant L as Local comment queue
+    participant S as Scheduled sweep queue
+    participant R as Central router
+    participant D as Exact-key downstream dispatcher
+    participant A as Durable artifact ledger
+    participant V as Review workflow
+
+    M->>L: issue_comment exact mention
+    S->>R: bounded organization sweep
+    L->>R: ordered interactive request
+    R->>D: canonical invocation payload + SHA-256 key
+    D->>A: claim exact ledger name
+    alt first live claim
+        D->>V: forward once
+        R-->>M: receipt / acknowledgement
+    else existing claim
+        D-->>R: duplicate suppressed
+    end
+```
+
+A receipt proves routing/claim processing occurred. It is not an approval and does not weaken exact-head checks, branch protection, or expected-head merge rules.
+
+## Preserved security and privacy boundaries
+
+- No model provider, reviewer identity, token name, secret, repository allowlist, dispatch payload, or permission changes.
+- `COPILOT_GITHUB_TOKEN` remains unused.
+- Workflow-default permissions remain `contents: read`; only existing job-scoped writes remain.
+- The local route still accepts only non-bot `OWNER`, `MEMBER`, or `COLLABORATOR` comments on pull requests in the central repository.
+- The sweep retains the configured organization-token / OpenCode installation-token credential chain.
+- Pull-request number, base branch, base SHA, current head SHA, requesting actor, source comment identifier, and requested agent remain bound into the canonical invocation key.
+- The exact-name Actions artifact ledger remains the authority for idempotent forwarding.
+- The ledger keeps the existing **30-day artifact retention** and contains bounded invocation metadata, not comment bodies, model output, credentials, or business payloads.
+
+The privacy alternative to masking is separation and minimization: this automation does not require business PII. It processes bounded GitHub control-plane metadata under repository authorization rather than copying business records into model prompts or artifacts.
+
+## CSAP / SOC 2 readiness evidence
+
+This repair improves availability and processing-integrity evidence without claiming certification.
+
+| Control concern | Evidence |
+| --- | --- |
+| Change management | Protected pull request and exact-head checks; qualifying independent review and post-integration evidence remain pending |
+| Availability | Separate local/sweep groups, bounded job timeouts, bounded interactive queue |
+| Processing integrity | Canonical invocation key, exact-name artifact claim, duplicate suppression |
+| Least privilege | Existing job-scoped permissions and credential separation remain unchanged |
+| Monitoring | Queue delay, receipt delay, sweep duration, dispatch count, duplicate-claim outcome |
+| Incident response | Fail-first contract, this doctoring record, rollout/rollback criteria |
+| Privacy | Metadata-only routing; no business payload or credential retained in ledger |
+
+## Monitoring and acceptance
+
+After protected merge:
+
+1. create a fresh exact-head `@opencode-agent` and/or `@cwl-noema-review` request;
+2. require a durable receipt or acknowledgement before relying on downstream review evidence;
+3. verify that scheduled sweep runs do not cancel or replace pending interactive routes;
+4. monitor local queue delay, sweep duration, dispatch count, duplicate-ledger outcomes, and downstream conclusions;
+5. alert when an eligible interactive request has no receipt within **10 minutes** of comment creation (a CWL operational alert threshold, not a GitHub SLA): this permits at most five minutes of queue delay plus the existing five-minute local execution timeout before operator investigation;
+6. alert immediately on a queue-limit rejection, unexpected cancellation of an interactive route, or when the interactive queue approaches the documented 100-pending limit;
+7. keep metrics finite-cardinality and exclude comment text, source diffs, tokens, and model responses.
+
+A downstream reviewer may still fail closed because credentials, providers, checks, or exact-head evidence are unavailable. That remains distinct from a routing queue failure.
+
+## Rollback
+
+Rollback must preserve interactive requests. Restoring the shared workflow-level group is not acceptable. A safe emergency degradation is to suspend the scheduled sweep while retaining the isolated local queue. Removing `queue: max` from the local group requires another independently reviewed durable queue that preserves every eligible invocation.
+
+## References (APA 7th)
+
+GitHub. (n.d.). *Concurrency*. GitHub Docs. Retrieved August 7, 2026, from https://docs.github.com/en/actions/concepts/workflows-and-actions/concurrency
+
+GitHub. (n.d.). *Control the concurrency of workflows and jobs*. GitHub Docs. Retrieved August 7, 2026, from https://docs.github.com/en/actions/how-tos/write-workflows/choose-when-workflows-run/control-workflow-concurrency
+
+GitHub. (n.d.). *REST API endpoints for GitHub Actions artifacts*. GitHub Docs. Retrieved August 7, 2026, from https://docs.github.com/en/rest/actions/artifacts
+
+GitHub. (n.d.). *Store and share data with workflow artifacts*. GitHub Docs. Retrieved August 7, 2026, from https://docs.github.com/en/actions/tutorials/store-and-share-data

tests/test_agent_mention_artifact_ledger.py

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
 MODULE_PATH = ROOT / "scripts" / "ci" / "agent_mention_router.py"
 NOEMA_WORKFLOW = ROOT / ".github" / "workflows" / "agent-mention-noema-dispatch.yml"
 OPENCODE_WORKFLOW = ROOT / ".github" / "workflows" / "agent-mention-opencode-dispatch.yml"
-DOC = ROOT / "docs" / "automation" / "review-agent-comment-invocation.md"
+DOC = ROOT / "docs" / "doctoring" / "agent-mention-concurrency-isolation.md"
 UPLOAD_ARTIFACT_SHA = "043fb46d1a93c77aae656e7c1c64a875d1fc6a0a"
 
 

tests/test_agent_mention_workflow_contract.py

@@ -10,6 +10,23 @@
 CHECKOUT_PIN = "actions/checkout@3d3c42e5aac5ba805825da76410c181273ba90b1 # v7.0.1"
 
 
+def _job_block(workflow: str, job_name: str, next_job_name: str | None) -> str:
+    """Return one top-level job block bounded by the following job."""
+    jobs = workflow.split("\njobs:\n", 1)[1]
+    start = jobs.index(f"  {job_name}:\n")
+    if next_job_name is None:
+        return jobs[start:]
+    end = jobs.index(f"\n  {next_job_name}:\n", start)
+    return jobs[start:end]
+
+
+def _concurrency_block(job: str) -> str:
+    """Return the exact job-scoped concurrency mapping before ``runs-on``."""
+    start = job.index("    concurrency:\n")
+    end = job.index("\n    runs-on:", start)
+    return job[start:end]
+
+
 def test_workflow_uses_local_event_and_central_sweep_with_job_scoped_writes() -> None:
     """The router is central-only, scheduled, and least-privileged."""
 
@@ -51,6 +68,31 @@ def test_workflow_uses_local_event_and_central_sweep_with_job_scoped_writes() ->
     assert "agent_mention_sweep.py" in sweep
 
 
+def test_interactive_mentions_and_sweeps_have_independent_queue_contracts() -> None:
+    """Scheduled sweeps cannot replace a pending trusted comment invocation."""
+
+    text = WORKFLOW.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
+    header = text.split("\njobs:\n", 1)[0]
+    local_job = _job_block(
+        text,
+        "route-local-agent-mention",
+        "sweep-organization-agent-mentions",
+    )
+    sweep_job = _job_block(text, "sweep-organization-agent-mentions", None)
+
+    assert not any(line.startswith("concurrency:") for line in header.splitlines())
+    assert _concurrency_block(local_job) == (
+        "    concurrency:\n"
+        "      group: review-agent-mention-router-local-${{ github.repository }}\n"
+        "      queue: max"
+    )
+    assert _concurrency_block(sweep_job) == (
+        "    concurrency:\n"
+        "      group: review-agent-mention-router-sweep-${{ github.repository }}\n"
+        "      cancel-in-progress: false"
+    )
+
+
 def test_quality_workflow_measures_exact_files_without_module_name_warnings() -> None:
     """Coverage includes the two script paths instead of treating paths as modules."""