-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
Patch check_op_reversible
to support tuple
subclasses.
#19046
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
randolf-scholz
wants to merge
4
commits into
python:master
Choose a base branch
from
randolf-scholz:reverse_op_for_subclass
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@ | ||
# tuple definition from typeshed, | ||
from typing import ( | ||
Generic, | ||
Sequence, | ||
TypeVar, | ||
Iterable, | ||
Iterator, | ||
Any, | ||
overload, | ||
Self, | ||
Protocol, | ||
) | ||
from types import GenericAlias | ||
|
||
_T = TypeVar("_T") | ||
_T_co = TypeVar('_T_co', covariant=True) | ||
|
||
class tuple(Sequence[_T_co], Generic[_T_co]): | ||
def __new__(cls, iterable: Iterable[_T_co] = ..., /) -> Self: ... | ||
def __len__(self) -> int: ... | ||
def __contains__(self, key: object, /) -> bool: ... | ||
@overload | ||
def __getitem__(self, key: SupportsIndex, /) -> _T_co: ... | ||
@overload | ||
def __getitem__(self, key: slice, /) -> tuple[_T_co, ...]: ... | ||
def __iter__(self) -> Iterator[_T_co]: ... | ||
def __lt__(self, value: tuple[_T_co, ...], /) -> bool: ... | ||
def __le__(self, value: tuple[_T_co, ...], /) -> bool: ... | ||
def __gt__(self, value: tuple[_T_co, ...], /) -> bool: ... | ||
def __ge__(self, value: tuple[_T_co, ...], /) -> bool: ... | ||
def __eq__(self, value: object, /) -> bool: ... | ||
def __hash__(self) -> int: ... | ||
@overload | ||
def __add__(self, value: tuple[_T_co, ...], /) -> tuple[_T_co, ...]: ... | ||
@overload | ||
def __add__(self, value: tuple[_T, ...], /) -> tuple[_T_co | _T, ...]: ... | ||
def __mul__(self, value: SupportsIndex, /) -> tuple[_T_co, ...]: ... | ||
def __rmul__(self, value: SupportsIndex, /) -> tuple[_T_co, ...]: ... | ||
def count(self, value: Any, /) -> int: ... | ||
def index(self, value: Any, start: SupportsIndex = ..., stop: SupportsIndex = ..., /) -> int: ... | ||
def __class_getitem__(cls, item: Any, /) -> GenericAlias: ... | ||
|
||
class dict: pass | ||
class int: pass | ||
class slice: pass | ||
class bool(int): pass | ||
class str: pass # For convenience | ||
class object: pass | ||
class type: pass | ||
class ellipsis: pass | ||
class SupportsIndex(Protocol): | ||
def __index__(self) -> int: pass | ||
class list(Sequence[_T], Generic[_T]): | ||
@overload | ||
def __getitem__(self, i: int) -> _T: ... | ||
@overload | ||
def __getitem__(self, s: slice) -> list[_T]: ... | ||
def __contains__(self, item: object) -> bool: ... | ||
def __iter__(self) -> Iterator[_T]: ... |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
formally called "modus ponens" (https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Modus_ponens), and the binary operator itself is called the "material conditional" (https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Material_conditional) 🤓