Skip to content

Fix: Fail early when database cluster does not respond #711

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

amotl
Copy link
Member

@amotl amotl commented May 6, 2025

Problem

@shraik started using sqlalchemy-cratedb and reported that its behaviour deviates from other vendors by not failing on engine.connect() when the database server is not available.

We found this is not actually on the SQLAlchemy dialect, but on the DBAPI driver already, which exhibits the same behaviour.

Solution

The patch extends the _lowest_server_version method to re-raise the last ConnectionError when no connection can be made to any configured server node a ConnectionError when connecting to all server nodes fails, including all error messages.

By doing it this way, we didn't need to submit a dummy SQL command like originally planned. We think it is much better this way because it does not pollute the server-side statement log.

Details

As an additional benefit, the software tests in test_connection.py are now actual integration tests.

/cc @mfussenegger, @seut, @surister

@amotl amotl requested review from seut and kneth May 6, 2025 21:42
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented May 6, 2025

"""

Walkthrough

The changes update the connection logic to fail early when the database server is unresponsive, by raising the last encountered connection error if no valid server version is found. The changelog is updated to reflect this. Additionally, a new test is introduced to verify that connection errors are properly raised for invalid server addresses. The client connection documentation was simplified by removing an interactive example. The test suite registration for connection tests was moved to the integration test layer.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
CHANGES.rst Added changelog entry about early failure on unresponsive database server.
src/crate/client/connection.py Modified _lowest_server_version to raise last ConnectionError if no server is reachable, collecting all connection errors.
tests/client/test_connection.py Added test to assert that a ConnectionError is raised for invalid server addresses; replaced hardcoded server address with variable.
tests/client/tests.py Moved ConnectionTest registration from unit to integration test suite with test layer.
docs/by-example/client.rst Simplified client connection docs by removing interactive example and verification output.
setup.py Added minimum version requirement verlib2>=0.3 in install_requires; updated license metadata.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant Connection
    participant Server

    Client->>Connection: connect()
    loop For each server
        Connection->>Server: request server version
        alt Server responds with version
            Connection->>Connection: store version if valid
        else Server not available (ConnectionError)
            Connection->>Connection: store last ConnectionError
        else Invalid version (ValueError/InvalidVersion)
            Connection->>Connection: ignore and continue
        end
    end
    alt No valid server version found and ConnectionError occurred
        Connection-->>Client: raise last ConnectionError
    else Valid server version found
        Connection-->>Client: proceed with connection
    end
Loading

Poem

In tunnels deep, connections seek,
To servers strong or servers weak.
Now if a host just will not play,
We fail up front—no more delay!
A test ensures the right alarm,
No silent errors, just clear charm.
🐇✨
"""


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 51ead0a and 891fc3c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • setup.py (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • setup.py
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (11)
  • GitHub Check: Python: 3.13 on macos-latest
  • GitHub Check: Python: 3.12 on macos-latest
  • GitHub Check: Python: 3.11 on macos-latest
  • GitHub Check: Python: 3.13 on ubuntu-22.04
  • GitHub Check: Python: 3.12 on ubuntu-22.04
  • GitHub Check: Python: 3.11 on ubuntu-22.04
  • GitHub Check: Python: 3.10 on ubuntu-22.04
  • GitHub Check: Python: 3.9 on ubuntu-22.04
  • GitHub Check: Python: 3.8 on ubuntu-22.04
  • GitHub Check: Python: 3.7 on ubuntu-22.04
  • GitHub Check: Run link checker
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

‼️ IMPORTANT
Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository in the CodeRabbit settings. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your replies unless it is explicitly tagged.

  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

except (ValueError, ConnectionError):
except ConnectionError as ex:
last_connection_error = ex
continue
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Won't this continue let you try all active servers? Do you want to stop at the first exception?

Copy link
Member Author

@amotl amotl May 7, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, like before, and no, like before. Do you think it should be done differently?

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I probably take the change log entry too literally.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, so what's happening? does it retry all servers provided and then throw the last connection error? (shouldn't it throw the first connection error maybe?)

Copy link
Member

@seut seut May 9, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If it would throw the first error, the whole logic of supporting multiple servers would be invalidated I think.

Copy link
Member

@seut seut May 9, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ah sry got this wrong, not sure if throwing the first error would be better.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

another option could be to put all connection errors into an exception if all servers raise connection errors.

Copy link
Member Author

@amotl amotl May 9, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If it would throw the first error, the whole logic of supporting multiple servers would be invalidated I think.

I share the same opinion that it would defeat the whole purpose of relevant routines, right.

Copy link
Member Author

@amotl amotl May 9, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

another option could be to put all connection errors into [a single] exception if all servers raise connection errors.

0046f03 implements this suggestion, thanks!

@amotl amotl force-pushed the fail-on-connect branch 3 times, most recently from fd7e0df to 7a285fe Compare May 7, 2025 21:10
Comment on lines -38 to +39
If no ``servers`` are given, the default one ``http://127.0.0.1:4200`` is used:

>>> connection = client.connect()
>>> connection.client._active_servers
['http://127.0.0.1:4200']
>>> connection.close()
If no ``servers`` are supplied to the ``connect`` method, the default address
``http://127.0.0.1:4200`` is used.
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is no server at http://127.0.0.1:4200. This test case just didn't fail because connect() did not raise an exception up until now.

Now, there is no longer a way to validate connecting to the default address per doctest file, because there is no server listening at http://127.0.0.1:4200. Because the core information is still viable, all what's left is pure prose, rephrased a bit.

@amotl amotl marked this pull request as ready for review May 7, 2025 21:18
@amotl amotl requested a review from kneth May 8, 2025 08:11
@amotl amotl force-pushed the fail-on-connect branch from 7a285fe to a572c98 Compare May 8, 2025 08:12
@amotl amotl requested review from matriv and removed request for seut May 8, 2025 10:26
Copy link

@surister surister left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Member

@seut seut left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lgtm

@amotl amotl force-pushed the fail-on-connect branch 3 times, most recently from 306feb5 to cb36d1b Compare May 9, 2025 11:25
Comment on lines 214 to 215
if lowest is None and len(connection_errors) == server_count:
raise ConnectionError(str(connection_errors))
Copy link
Member Author

@amotl amotl May 9, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

str(connection_errors) uses an opaque way to serialize the list of exception instances into a string, but I think it is viable and does not cause too many surprises for callers that expect exception.message to be of str type. Do you have any objections or suggestions to do it differently, like using JSON instead? 1

Footnotes

  1. In general, raise ConnectionError(connection_errors) is also possible, but the caller then needs to handle the exception value as a list type, which is semantically different on some occasions like "Server not available" in ex.exception.message would no longer be True, bearing potential breaking changes, at least for a few test cases of the test suite already.

Copy link
Member Author

@amotl amotl May 9, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[...] suggestions to do it differently, like using JSON instead?

The procedure now uses JSON instead of an opaque Python-serialized string per e818221.

For a single element, it looks like this now:

 crate.client.exceptions.ConnectionError: ["Server not available, exception: HTTPConnectionPool(host='127.0.0.1', port=44209): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by ReadTimeoutError(\"HTTPConnectionPool(host='127.0.0.1', port=44209): Read timed out. (read timeout=0.01)\"))"]

-- https://github.com/crate/crate-python/actions/runs/14928213165/job/41937814085?pr=711#step:5:357

@amotl amotl changed the title Fix: Fail early when database server does not respond Fix: Fail early when database cluster does not respond May 9, 2025
@amotl amotl force-pushed the fail-on-connect branch from cb36d1b to 0046f03 Compare May 9, 2025 11:36
@amotl amotl requested review from surister and seut May 9, 2025 11:51
amotl added 3 commits May 9, 2025 13:59
The procedure will collect all `ConnectionError` instances and include
them into the exception message of the final `ConnectionError`.
All `ConnectionError` instances that have been collected will be
serialized into JSON now.
@amotl amotl force-pushed the fail-on-connect branch from e818221 to d22fde9 Compare May 9, 2025 12:01
Copy link
Member

@seut seut left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@amotl
Copy link
Member Author

amotl commented May 9, 2025

We just published a pre-release package including those updates per crate-2.1.0.dev0 and notified @shraik about it at crate/sqlalchemy-cratedb#218 (comment).

Copy link
Contributor

@matriv matriv left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@amotl Thank you! Is there a way to test that we don't fail the connection attempt, but only if only all servers provided fail?
Can we also test the exception when multiple nodes fail?

continue
if not lowest or version < lowest:
lowest = version
if connection_errors and len(connection_errors) == server_count:
raise ConnectionError(json.dumps(list(map(str, connection_errors))))
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why not just raise ConnectionError(error_list)?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've elaborated about it here, but I am also not sure, that's why I am also asking about your opinion.

amotl added 2 commits May 10, 2025 16:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants