Skip to content

PWM actuator #72

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 23, 2025
Merged

PWM actuator #72

merged 1 commit into from
May 23, 2025

Conversation

linguini1
Copy link
Contributor

PWM actuators implemented and various fixes.

@linguini1 linguini1 requested review from justapotato213 and bskdany and removed request for justapotato213 May 22, 2025 17:45
@bskdany
Copy link
Contributor

bskdany commented May 22, 2025

Debatable claim that goto is cleaner than an if statement, but if it works it works

bskdany
bskdany previously approved these changes May 23, 2025
@linguini1
Copy link
Contributor Author

linguini1 commented May 23, 2025

Debatable claim that goto is cleaner than an if statement, but if it works it works

I don't think the same thing can be accomplished with an if-statement

@linguini1 linguini1 marked this pull request as draft May 23, 2025 01:09
@linguini1 linguini1 marked this pull request as ready for review May 23, 2025 17:32
Copy link
Member

@EliasJRH EliasJRH left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

plz let this work

@linguini1 linguini1 merged commit bd3ac5a into main May 23, 2025
3 checks passed
@linguini1 linguini1 deleted the pwm-actuator branch May 23, 2025 17:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants