Skip to content

1.21 advancements compat refactor #41

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

EpyonProjects
Copy link
Collaborator

Moves the advancements from /packs/extras/skyvoid_advancements to packs/advancements and set up a pipeline for future variants like One Block

Copy link
Owner

@BPR02 BPR02 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good apart from a few things as listed in the review comments. I tested the one block pack and it seems to just change the root advancement title and description, but I'm assuming the actual advancement changes for one block coming later in a different PR given the description of the PR.

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
scoreboard players set skyvoid_advancements load.status 1
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The name should probably include that this is the one block advancements (e.g. skyvoid_oneblock_advancements). Similarly, the standard skyblock one should be named with that too (e.g. skyvoid_skyblock_advancements).

id: 'skyvoid_advancements_standard'
name: 'SkyBlock Advancements'
author: 'EpyonProjects'
version: 2.0.0
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm assuming there is a major change since you changed the root advancement? Don't forget to change the load score in the load.mcfunction to match the major version (I can't comment on that file cuz it was moved and without changes).

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm, no there wasn't exactly a reason for the major change other than that the pipeline was different. I have vague memories of having this conversation already, where it shouldn't matter because it's the same output / non-breaking for the player.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants