Adding API gateway 1.2.0 performance test results - #432
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe performance documentation now describes Amazon EKS deployment, revised concurrency and runtime settings, updated benchmark datasets, and versioned chart assets for two-CPU and four-CPU scenarios. ChangesPerformance documentation
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~15 minutes Possibly related PRs
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 10
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/gateway-runtime-with-four-cpus.md`:
- Line 52: Update the benchmark artifact references in this page so all linked
assets use the 1.2.0 dataset: add the missing /1.2.0/ segment to the
mediation-policy percentile image link and change the CSV link from
api-gateway-1.1.0-perf-test-results to its matching 1.2.0 artifact.
In `@en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/gateway-runtime-with-two-cpus.md`:
- Line 25: Replace “requests/sec” with “requests per second” in the throughput
headings at
en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/gateway-runtime-with-two-cpus.md:25-25,
en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/gateway-runtime-with-two-cpus.md:25-25,
en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/gateway-runtime-with-four-cpus.md:25-25,
and
en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/gateway-runtime-with-four-cpus.md:25-25.
- Line 50: Keep all benchmark artifacts aligned with the 1.2.0 dataset. In
en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/gateway-runtime-with-two-cpus.md (Line 50
anchor), en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/gateway-runtime-with-two-cpus.md
(Line 50 sibling),
en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/gateway-runtime-with-four-cpus.md (Line 52
sibling), and
en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/gateway-runtime-with-four-cpus.md (Line 52
sibling), update the CSV links to target the 1.2.0 result set; additionally add
/1.2.0/ to the mediation-policy percentile asset links in both four-CPU pages.
In `@en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/overview.md`:
- Line 3: Update the frontmatter description in
en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/overview.md at lines 3-3 and
en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/overview.md at lines 3-3 with the same
shortened description, keeping it under 158 characters and expanding Amazon
Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS) at first use.
- Line 23: Update the Results paragraph in both
en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/overview.md:23-23 and
en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/overview.md:23-23 to describe tests with
100, 500, and 1000 concurrent users across two gateway configurations, removing
the outdated payload-size and two-concurrency-level descriptions.
- Line 36: Replace positional “below” image references in
en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/overview.md:36 and
en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/overview.md:36 with “The deployment diagram
shows...”. In
en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/gateway-runtime-with-two-cpus.md:27,
en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/gateway-runtime-with-two-cpus.md:27,
en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/gateway-runtime-with-four-cpus.md:27, and
en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/gateway-runtime-with-four-cpus.md:27, use
“The throughput chart shows...” instead.
- Line 18: Rewrite the performance methodology in active voice with short,
direct sentences. Update the referenced passages around the API evaluation, test
execution, configuration, deployment, and documentation so each states the
responsible actor, removes filler such as “As the name suggests,” and keeps each
sentence within 26 words.
- Line 38: Update every listed image in
en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/overview.md:38-38,
en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/overview.md:38-38, both
gateway-runtime-with-two-cpus.md files at lines 29-29, 40-40, and 50-50, and
both gateway-runtime-with-four-cpus.md files at lines 29-29, 41-41, and 52-52.
Shorten each alt text to 155 characters or fewer while preserving its subject,
and add the required 1x/2x srcset to every image.
In `@en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/gateway-runtime-with-four-cpus.md`:
- Line 52: Update the benchmark artifact links in this performance report,
including the mediation-policy percentile image and the CSV link, to use the
matching 1.2.0 dataset. Preserve the existing link targets and formatting while
replacing the omitted or outdated 1.1.0 artifact references.
In `@en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/overview.md`:
- Line 18: Rewrite the updated methodology in
en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/overview.md using active voice, short
sentences, and explicit actors. Update the text at the referenced sections,
including the sentence around “The performance of the WSO2 API Platform
Gateway,” to remove passive constructions, split sentences exceeding 26 words,
and remove filler such as “As the name suggests.”
🪄 Autofix
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 270b2abf-c230-48a5-ae61-8849570f20b2
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (9)
en/docs/assets/img/api-gateway/performance/1.2.0/deployment-used-for-test.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngen/docs/assets/img/api-gateway/performance/1.2.0/four-core-AP- with-8-routes-Response-Time-vs-Concurrent-Users.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgen/docs/assets/img/api-gateway/performance/1.2.0/four-core-API-with-8-routes-Mediation-Policy-Response-Time-vs-Concurrent-Users.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgen/docs/assets/img/api-gateway/performance/1.2.0/four-core-Average-Response-Time-vs-Concurrent-Users.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgen/docs/assets/img/api-gateway/performance/1.2.0/four-core-Throughput-vs-Concurrent-Users.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgen/docs/assets/img/api-gateway/performance/1.2.0/two-core-API-with-8-routes-Mediation-policy-Percentile-Response-Time-vs-Concurrent-Users.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgen/docs/assets/img/api-gateway/performance/1.2.0/two-core-api-with-8-routes-Percentile-Response-Time-vs-Concurrent-Users.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgen/docs/assets/img/api-gateway/performance/1.2.0/two-core-average-response-time-vs-concurrent-users.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgen/docs/assets/img/api-gateway/performance/1.2.0/two-core-throughput-vs-concurrent-users.svgis excluded by!**/*.svg
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/gateway-runtime-with-four-cpus.mden/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/gateway-runtime-with-two-cpus.mden/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/overview.mden/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/gateway-runtime-with-four-cpus.mden/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/gateway-runtime-with-two-cpus.mden/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/overview.md
| The graphs below show the 90th, 95th, and 99th percentile response times at 0 ms backend delay. Percentile values indicate the response time below which that percentage of requests completed, for example, the 99th percentile is the response time exceeded by only 1% of requests. | ||
|
|
||
| { width="900" } | ||
| { width="900" } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🗄️ Data Integrity & Integration | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win
Keep all linked benchmark artifacts on the 1.2.0 dataset.
The mediation-policy percentile image at Line 59 omits /1.2.0/. The CSV link at Line 65 still targets api-gateway-1.1.0-perf-test-results. Update both links to the matching 1.2.0 artifacts.
The PR objective identifies this page as a 1.2.0 benchmark report.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/gateway-runtime-with-four-cpus.md` at
line 52, Update the benchmark artifact references in this page so all linked
assets use the 1.2.0 dataset: add the missing /1.2.0/ segment to the
mediation-policy percentile image link and change the CSV link from
api-gateway-1.1.0-perf-test-results to its matching 1.2.0 artifact.
| | Gateway Runtime | 2 | 2 GB | 2 | 2 | | ||
| | Gateway Runtime | 2 | 2 GB | 2 | 1 | | ||
|
|
||
| ## Throughput (requests/sec) vs. concurrent users |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win
Use plain wording for throughput units.
Each heading uses the undefined abbreviation requests/sec.
en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/gateway-runtime-with-two-cpus.md#L25-L25: replace it withrequests per second.en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/gateway-runtime-with-two-cpus.md#L25-L25: apply the same correction.en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/gateway-runtime-with-four-cpus.md#L25-L25: apply the same correction.en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/gateway-runtime-with-four-cpus.md#L25-L25: apply the same correction.
As per coding guidelines, define abbreviations and use plain language.
📍 Affects 4 files
en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/gateway-runtime-with-two-cpus.md#L25-L25(this comment)en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/gateway-runtime-with-two-cpus.md#L25-L25en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/gateway-runtime-with-four-cpus.md#L25-L25en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/gateway-runtime-with-four-cpus.md#L25-L25
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/gateway-runtime-with-two-cpus.md` at
line 25, Replace “requests/sec” with “requests per second” in the throughput
headings at
en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/gateway-runtime-with-two-cpus.md:25-25,
en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/gateway-runtime-with-two-cpus.md:25-25,
en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/gateway-runtime-with-four-cpus.md:25-25,
and
en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/gateway-runtime-with-four-cpus.md:25-25.
Source: Coding guidelines
| The graphs below show the 90th, 95th, and 99th percentile response times at 0 ms backend delay. Percentile values indicate the response time below which that percentage of requests completed, for example, the 99th percentile is the response time exceeded by only 1% of requests. | ||
|
|
||
| { width="900" } | ||
| { width="900" } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🗄️ Data Integrity & Integration | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win
Keep every benchmark artifact on the 1.2.0 dataset.
The result pages mix 1.2.0 chart assets with older or unversioned result artifacts.
en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/gateway-runtime-with-two-cpus.md#L50-L50: update the CSV target at Line 65 from the 1.1.0 result set.en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/gateway-runtime-with-two-cpus.md#L50-L50: apply the same CSV correction.en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/gateway-runtime-with-four-cpus.md#L52-L52: add/1.2.0/to the mediation-policy percentile asset and update the CSV target.en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/gateway-runtime-with-four-cpus.md#L52-L52: apply the same corrections.
The PR objective identifies these pages as 1.2.0 benchmark reports.
📍 Affects 4 files
en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/gateway-runtime-with-two-cpus.md#L50-L50(this comment)en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/gateway-runtime-with-two-cpus.md#L50-L50en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/gateway-runtime-with-four-cpus.md#L52-L52en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/gateway-runtime-with-four-cpus.md#L52-L52
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/gateway-runtime-with-two-cpus.md` at
line 50, Keep all benchmark artifacts aligned with the 1.2.0 dataset. In
en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/gateway-runtime-with-two-cpus.md (Line 50
anchor), en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/gateway-runtime-with-two-cpus.md
(Line 50 sibling),
en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/gateway-runtime-with-four-cpus.md (Line 52
sibling), and
en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/gateway-runtime-with-four-cpus.md (Line 52
sibling), update the CSV links to target the 1.2.0 result set; additionally add
/1.2.0/ to the mediation-policy percentile asset links in both four-CPU pages.
| --- | ||
| title: "API Platform Gateway Performance" | ||
| description: "Review WSO2 API Platform Gateway performance test methodology, deployment architecture, metrics, and benchmark results for two-CPU and four-CPU gateway runtime configurations." | ||
| description: "Review WSO2 API Platform Gateway performance test methodology, Amazon EKS deployment architecture, metrics, and benchmark results for two-CPU and four-CPU gateway runtime configurations." |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win
Use a compliant description in both overview pages.
Both descriptions exceed 158 characters and use EKS before expansion.
en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/overview.md#L3-L3: shorten the description and defineAmazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS).en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/overview.md#L3-L3: apply the same compliant description.
As per coding guidelines, frontmatter descriptions must be under 158 characters, and acronyms must be defined at first use.
📍 Affects 2 files
en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/overview.md#L3-L3(this comment)en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/overview.md#L3-L3
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/overview.md` at line 3, Update the
frontmatter description in en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/overview.md at
lines 3-3 and en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/overview.md at lines 3-3 with
the same shortened description, keeping it under 158 characters and expanding
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS) at first use.
Source: Coding guidelines
| # API Platform Gateway Performance | ||
|
|
||
| The performance of the WSO2 API Platform Gateway was evaluated using the following APIs, both of which invoke a simple Netty HTTP Echo Service. As the name suggests, the Netty service echoes back any request it receives. | ||
| The performance of the WSO2 API Platform Gateway was evaluated using the following APIs, both of which invoke a simple Netty HTTP Echo Service running on the same Amazon EKS cluster as the gateway. As the name suggests, the Netty service echoes back any request it receives. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win
Rewrite the updated methodology in active voice and short sentences.
The changed text uses passive constructions such as was evaluated, were conducted, was configured, are deployed, and are documented. Line 18 also exceeds 26 words and includes the filler phrase As the name suggests. Split the content and state the actor directly.
As per coding guidelines, use active voice, concise sentences, and direct wording.
Also applies to: 23-23, 34-34, 49-49
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/overview.md` at line 18, Rewrite the
performance methodology in active voice with short, direct sentences. Update the
referenced passages around the API evaluation, test execution, configuration,
deployment, and documentation so each states the responsible actor, removes
filler such as “As the name suggests,” and keeps each sentence within 26 words.
Source: Coding guidelines
| - **API with mediation policies**: An API configured with the same eight routes, with a Set Header policy applied to both the request and response flows. | ||
|
|
||
| The performance tests were conducted with 100, 500, 800, and 1000 concurrent users, where concurrent users represent multiple clients accessing the gateway simultaneously. To evaluate the impact of different message sizes, tests were performed using payload sizes of 50 B, 1 KiB, 10 KiB, and 100 KiB. The backend response delay was configured to 0 ms. | ||
| The performance tests were conducted with 100, 500, and 1000 concurrent users, where concurrent users represent multiple clients accessing the gateway simultaneously. The backend response delay was configured to 0 ms. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🗄️ Data Integrity & Integration | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win
Align both Results summaries with the revised test plan.
Both pages list three user counts but still describe payload sizes and two concurrency levels.
en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/overview.md#L23-L23: rewrite the Results paragraph to describe 100, 500, and 1000 concurrent users and two gateway configurations.en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/overview.md#L23-L23: apply the same correction.
The PR objective identifies this cohort as a 1.2.0 benchmark report with revised test dimensions.
📍 Affects 2 files
en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/overview.md#L23-L23(this comment)en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/overview.md#L23-L23
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/overview.md` at line 23, Update the
Results paragraph in both
en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/overview.md:23-23 and
en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/overview.md:23-23 to describe tests with
100, 500, and 1000 concurrent users across two gateway configurations, removing
the outdated payload-size and two-concurrency-level descriptions.
|
|
||
| The WSO2 API Platform Gateway and Netty HTTP Backend are deployed on an Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS) cluster. Apache JMeter client and servers run on separate Amazon EC2 instances outside the cluster. | ||
|
|
||
| The diagram below shows the deployment architecture used for the performance tests documented here. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win
Replace positional image references.
Each affected sentence uses below to identify an image.
en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/overview.md#L36-L36: useThe deployment diagram shows....en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/overview.md#L36-L36: apply the same wording.en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/gateway-runtime-with-two-cpus.md#L27-L27: useThe throughput chart shows....en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/gateway-runtime-with-two-cpus.md#L27-L27: apply the same wording.en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/gateway-runtime-with-four-cpus.md#L27-L27: apply the same wording.en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/gateway-runtime-with-four-cpus.md#L27-L27: apply the same wording.
As per coding guidelines, do not refer to images by position.
📍 Affects 6 files
en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/overview.md#L36-L36(this comment)en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/overview.md#L36-L36en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/gateway-runtime-with-two-cpus.md#L27-L27en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/gateway-runtime-with-two-cpus.md#L27-L27en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/gateway-runtime-with-four-cpus.md#L27-L27en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/gateway-runtime-with-four-cpus.md#L27-L27
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/overview.md` at line 36, Replace
positional “below” image references in
en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/overview.md:36 and
en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/overview.md:36 with “The deployment diagram
shows...”. In
en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/gateway-runtime-with-two-cpus.md:27,
en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/gateway-runtime-with-two-cpus.md:27,
en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/gateway-runtime-with-four-cpus.md:27, and
en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/gateway-runtime-with-four-cpus.md:27, use
“The throughput chart shows...” instead.
Source: Coding guidelines
| The diagram below shows the deployment architecture used for the performance tests documented here. | ||
|
|
||
| { width="900" } | ||
| { width="900" } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win
Apply the image markup rules to every changed image.
Each affected image has overly long alt text and lacks a 1x/2x srcset.
en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/overview.md#L38-L38: shorten the deployment alt text and add the requiredsrcset.en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/overview.md#L38-L38: apply the same correction.en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/gateway-runtime-with-two-cpus.md#L29-L29: shorten the throughput alt text and addsrcset.en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/gateway-runtime-with-two-cpus.md#L40-L40: shorten the average-response-time alt text and addsrcset.en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/gateway-runtime-with-two-cpus.md#L50-L50: shorten the percentile alt text and addsrcset.en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/gateway-runtime-with-two-cpus.md#L29-L29: apply the throughput correction.en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/gateway-runtime-with-two-cpus.md#L40-L40: apply the average-response-time correction.en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/gateway-runtime-with-two-cpus.md#L50-L50: apply the percentile correction.en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/gateway-runtime-with-four-cpus.md#L29-L29: apply the throughput correction.en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/gateway-runtime-with-four-cpus.md#L41-L41: apply the average-response-time correction.en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/gateway-runtime-with-four-cpus.md#L52-L52: apply the percentile correction.en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/gateway-runtime-with-four-cpus.md#L29-L29: apply the throughput correction.en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/gateway-runtime-with-four-cpus.md#L41-L41: apply the average-response-time correction.en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/gateway-runtime-with-four-cpus.md#L52-L52: apply the percentile correction.
As per coding guidelines, alt text must be at most 155 characters, and images must include a 1x/2xsrcset. As per path instructions, apply these rules strictly toen/docs/**/*.md.
📍 Affects 6 files
en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/overview.md#L38-L38(this comment)en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/overview.md#L38-L38en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/gateway-runtime-with-two-cpus.md#L29-L29en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/gateway-runtime-with-two-cpus.md#L40-L40en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/gateway-runtime-with-two-cpus.md#L50-L50en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/gateway-runtime-with-two-cpus.md#L29-L29en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/gateway-runtime-with-two-cpus.md#L40-L40en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/gateway-runtime-with-two-cpus.md#L50-L50en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/gateway-runtime-with-four-cpus.md#L29-L29en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/gateway-runtime-with-four-cpus.md#L41-L41en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/gateway-runtime-with-four-cpus.md#L52-L52en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/gateway-runtime-with-four-cpus.md#L29-L29en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/gateway-runtime-with-four-cpus.md#L41-L41en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/gateway-runtime-with-four-cpus.md#L52-L52
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/overview.md` at line 38, Update every
listed image in en/docs/api-gateway/1.2.0/performance/overview.md:38-38,
en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/overview.md:38-38, both
gateway-runtime-with-two-cpus.md files at lines 29-29, 40-40, and 50-50, and
both gateway-runtime-with-four-cpus.md files at lines 29-29, 41-41, and 52-52.
Shorten each alt text to 155 characters or fewer while preserving its subject,
and add the required 1x/2x srcset to every image.
Sources: Coding guidelines, Path instructions
| The graphs below show the 90th, 95th, and 99th percentile response times at 0 ms backend delay. Percentile values indicate the response time below which that percentage of requests completed, for example, the 99th percentile is the response time exceeded by only 1% of requests. | ||
|
|
||
| { width="900" } | ||
| { width="900" } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🗄️ Data Integrity & Integration | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win
Keep all linked benchmark artifacts on the 1.2.0 dataset.
The mediation-policy percentile image at Line 59 omits /1.2.0/. The CSV link at Line 65 still targets api-gateway-1.1.0-perf-test-results. Update both links to the matching 1.2.0 artifacts.
The PR objective identifies this page as a 1.2.0 benchmark report.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/gateway-runtime-with-four-cpus.md` at
line 52, Update the benchmark artifact links in this performance report,
including the mediation-policy percentile image and the CSV link, to use the
matching 1.2.0 dataset. Preserve the existing link targets and formatting while
replacing the omitted or outdated 1.1.0 artifact references.
| # API Platform Gateway Performance | ||
|
|
||
| The performance of the WSO2 API Platform Gateway was evaluated using the following APIs, both of which invoke a simple Netty HTTP Echo Service. As the name suggests, the Netty service echoes back any request it receives. | ||
| The performance of the WSO2 API Platform Gateway was evaluated using the following APIs, both of which invoke a simple Netty HTTP Echo Service running on the same Amazon EKS cluster as the gateway. As the name suggests, the Netty service echoes back any request it receives. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win
Rewrite the updated methodology in active voice and short sentences.
The changed text uses passive constructions such as was evaluated, were conducted, was configured, are deployed, and are documented. Line 18 also exceeds 26 words and includes the filler phrase As the name suggests. Split the content and state the actor directly.
As per coding guidelines, use active voice, concise sentences, and direct wording.
Also applies to: 23-23, 34-34, 49-49
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/overview.md` at line 18, Rewrite the
updated methodology in en/docs/api-gateway/next/performance/overview.md using
active voice, short sentences, and explicit actors. Update the text at the
referenced sections, including the sentence around “The performance of the WSO2
API Platform Gateway,” to remove passive constructions, split sentences
exceeding 26 words, and remove filler such as “As the name suggests.”
Source: Coding guidelines
Purpose
This PR adds the performance test results for API Platform Gateway v1.2.0 from a Kubernetes deployment provisioned on AWS EKS.
The results are presented using the same reporting approach as the previous performance reports, with the charts updated to reflect the latest benchmark results.
Checklist
llms.txt(located aten/docs/llms.txt) is updated for AI readiness content.