docs(changelog): record the lint retired-stale fix#479
docs(changelog): record the lint retired-stale fix#479luciferlive112116 wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 57 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
the fix landed in vouchdev#484 without a changelog entry, and the `## [Unreleased]` / `### Fixed` section is what the next release notes are rolled from — a user-visible behaviour change (lint stops emitting `stale_claim` warnings for retired claims) would otherwise ship undocumented.
1d73598 to
52b0efb
Compare
|
#484 landed the same fix first, so i've rebased this onto current what's left is just the changelog entry, which #484 didn't include. the |
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Action performedReview finished.
|
what changed
adds the
## [Unreleased]→### Fixedchangelog entry for the lintretired-stale fix that landed in #484 (issue #478). changelog only — no
code change.
this pr originally carried the fix itself; #484 landed the same change
first, so it has been reduced to the one piece that wasn't merged with it.
why
CONTRIBUTING requires a
CHANGELOG.mdentry under## [Unreleased]foruser-visible changes, and #484 shipped
health.py+ tests without one.lint no longer emitting
stale_claimwarnings for retired claims isuser-visible — anyone parsing
vouch lintoutput sees a different set offindings.
### Fixedis what the next release notes are rolled from(CONTRIBUTING §"Release checklist" step 2), so without this the change
ships undocumented.
what might break
nothing. documentation only — no code, no on-disk shape, no
kb.*behaviour.
tests
fix(lint): exempt retired claims from stale check #484 (
test_lint_exempts_retired_claims_from_stale_check,test_lint_flags_stale_active_claims).