Use PiecewiseSequence for List take elements by danking · Pull Request #8833 · vortex-data/vortex

Performance Gate Passed

⚡ 13 improved benchmarks
✅ 1785 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 44 skipped benchmarks¹

	Mode	Benchmark	`BASE`	`HEAD`	Efficiency
⚡	Simulation	`copy_nullable[65536]`	1.4 ms	1 ms	+32.05%
⚡	Simulation	`take_filter_list_nullable_random_mask_random_indices[256, 50]`	129.3 µs	99.4 µs	+30.05%
⚡	Simulation	`take_filter_list_slice_mask_random_indices[768, 50]`	119.7 µs	92.4 µs	+29.6%
⚡	Simulation	`take_filter_list_nullable_random_mask_random_indices[768, 50]`	133.9 µs	103.5 µs	+29.39%
⚡	Simulation	`take_filter_list_slice_mask_random_indices[256, 50]`	118.8 µs	92 µs	+29.03%
⚡	Simulation	`take_filter_list_small_random_mask_random_indices[256, 10]`	116.9 µs	90.9 µs	+28.51%
⚡	Simulation	`take_filter_list_small_uncached_random_mask_random_indices[256, 10]`	117.2 µs	91.6 µs	+28.03%
⚡	Simulation	`take_filter_list_small_uncached_random_mask_random_indices[768, 10]`	121 µs	94.9 µs	+27.58%
⚡	Simulation	`take_filter_list_small_random_mask_random_indices[768, 10]`	120.9 µs	94.9 µs	+27.41%
⚡	Simulation	`take_filter_list_random_mask_random_indices[256, 50]`	121.9 µs	96.1 µs	+26.86%
⚡	Simulation	`take_filter_list_random_mask_random_indices[768, 50]`	127.2 µs	100.5 µs	+26.55%
⚡	Simulation	`copy_non_nullable[65536]`	1,089.2 µs	908.6 µs	+19.88%
⚡	Simulation	`take_fsl_f16_force_manual_range_copy[1, 10]`	14.3 µs	12.9 µs	+10.52%

Tip

Curious why this is faster? Comment @codspeedbot explain why this is faster on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

_{Comparing codex/list-take-piecewise-elements (e0096ca) with develop (add6944)}

44 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩