Skip to content

[WIP] TakeExecute for FilterArray #7393

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
robert3005 wants to merge 3 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

format

0ba188e
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
Draft

[WIP] TakeExecute for FilterArray #7393

format
0ba188e
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
CodSpeed HQ / CodSpeed Performance Analysis failed Apr 15, 2026 in 0s

Performance Regression: -84.97%

⚡ 36 improved benchmarks
❌ 12 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1105 untouched benchmarks
🆕 10 new benchmarks
⏩ 1455 skipped benchmarks1

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
⚡ Simulation take_filter_random_mask_random_indices[50000, 1000] 663.9 µs 259.2 µs ×2.6
❌ Simulation take_filter_random_mask_random_indices[10000] 359.3 µs 2,106.1 µs -82.94%
❌ Simulation take_filter_random_mask_random_indices[50000, 10000] 753.3 µs 2,170.8 µs -65.3%
❌ Simulation take_filter_random_mask_random_indices[90000, 10000] 998.8 µs 2,141.6 µs -53.36%
⚡ Simulation take_filter_random_mask_random_indices[90000, 1000] 918.5 µs 262 µs ×3.5
⚡ Simulation take_filter_random_mask_sequential_indices[10000, 1000] 275.1 µs 149.9 µs +83.56%
❌ Simulation take_filter_random_mask_sequential_indices[50000, 10000] 741.9 µs 1,206.6 µs -38.51%
❌ Simulation take_filter_random_mask_sequential_indices[10000] 354.3 µs 1,343 µs -73.62%
❌ Simulation take_filter_random_mask_sequential_indices[90000, 10000] 986 µs 1,182.7 µs -16.63%
⚡ Simulation take_filter_random_mask_sequential_indices[50000, 1000] 662.6 µs 132.2 µs ×5
❌ Simulation take_filter_slice_mask_random_indices[50000, 10000] 990.7 µs 2,033.3 µs -51.28%
❌ Simulation take_filter_slice_mask_random_indices[10000] 296.9 µs 1,974.9 µs -84.97%
⚡ Simulation take_filter_random_mask_sequential_indices[90000, 1000] 897.2 µs 128.7 µs ×7
❌ Simulation take_filter_slice_mask_random_indices[90000, 10000] 759.1 µs 2,141.9 µs -64.56%
⚡ Simulation take_filter_slice_mask_random_indices[90000, 1000] 669.1 µs 258.1 µs ×2.6
⚡ Simulation take_filter_slice_mask_sequential_indices[10000, 1000] 213 µs 137 µs +55.46%
⚡ Simulation take_filter_slice_mask_sequential_indices[50000, 1000] 899.7 µs 133.9 µs ×6.7
❌ Simulation take_filter_slice_mask_sequential_indices[10000] 291.6 µs 1,202.2 µs -75.74%
❌ Simulation take_filter_slice_mask_sequential_indices[50000, 10000] 979.7 µs 1,170.2 µs -16.29%
⚡ Simulation take_filter_slice_mask_random_indices[50000, 1000] 901.9 µs 242.6 µs ×3.7
... ... ... ... ... ...

ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.

Comparing rk/parentexecute (0ba188e) with develop (4a5b7d7)

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 1455 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

View more details on CodSpeed HQ