Conversation
Added a test case for `HashMap` that explicitly triggers resizing by exceeding the initial capacity and verifies that all items are successfully retained and mapped to their correct values. This addresses the missing testing gap for the `resize()` logic. Co-authored-by: ulac000000 <132948319+ulac000000@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
1 participant
🎯 What: The testing gap addressed is the lack of a test explicitly covering the
resize()logic of the customHashMapimplementation when capacity bounds are exceeded.📊 Coverage: A new test case was added to
hashmap.zigthat sets an initial capacity and inserts enough elements to force the internal array to resize. The test verifies that:countcorrectly reflects the number of items.✨ Result: Increased code coverage by adding happy-path verification of the HashMap's resize logic, ensuring items are not lost and capacity scales correctly when the map grows.
PR created automatically by Jules for task 7443214070705393948 started by @ulac000000