Skip to content

feat(streams): add WebSocket v1 client protocol contract - #3763

Draft
alangenfeld wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
alangenfeld/ws-stream-protocol-v1-client
Draft

feat(streams): add WebSocket v1 client protocol contract#3763
alangenfeld wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
alangenfeld/ws-stream-protocol-v1-client

Conversation

@alangenfeld

@alangenfeld alangenfeld commented Aug 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary & Motivation

Defines the workflow-stream-ws/v1 frame schemas and encoder in @workflow/world-vercel, versioned independently of the REST API and workflow spec so a framing or acknowledgement change needs a new endpoint rather than a spec bump. Nothing calls it yet.

Test Plan

Protocol tests added, including a byte-for-byte check against workflow-server's canonical frame fixture.

Signed-off-by: Alex Langenfeld <alex.langenfeld@vercel.com>
@changeset-bot

changeset-bot Bot commented Aug 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: ac59df1

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 17 packages
Name Type
@workflow/world-vercel Patch
@workflow/cli Patch
@workflow/core Patch
@workflow/web Patch
workflow Patch
@workflow/world-testing Patch
@workflow/builders Patch
@workflow/next Patch
@workflow/nitro Patch
@workflow/vitest Patch
@workflow/web-shared Patch
@workflow/astro Patch
@workflow/nest Patch
@workflow/rollup Patch
@workflow/sveltekit Patch
@workflow/vite Patch
@workflow/nuxt Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

Some tests failed

❌ Failed E2E Tests

▲ Vercel Production (8 failed)

python-node (8 failed):

  • promiseAllWorkflow | wrun_41M0TX9M260GQZZSE6MFEN180K | 🔍 observability
  • sleepingWorkflow | wrun_41M0TXA9X50GGY770Y2EEHECAR | 🔍 observability
  • parallelSleepWorkflow | wrun_41M0TXABZS0GVK1BHSMNV17FQR | 🔍 observability
  • nullByteWorkflow | wrun_41M0TXAKNN0GYSH1708DP9T4A5 | 🔍 observability
  • cancelRun - cancelling a running workflow | wrun_41M0TXFFQ30GGM70CKK2XY24F4 | 🔍 observability
  • cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow | wrun_41M0TXFKEJ0GYZ7FSNCAWRQCAS | 🔍 observability
  • sleepInLoopWorkflow - sleep inside loop with steps actually delays each iteration | wrun_41M0TXFR9C0GYHNB4ARQHZPDEB | 🔍 observability
  • resilient start: addTenWorkflow completes when run_created returns 500 | wrun_41M0TXGA9F0GWFQJVD83BA886Y | 🔍 observability

🌐 Cross-language Conformance (9 failed)

python (9 failed):

  • deploymentId: 'latest' is a no-op in non-Vercel worlds | wrun_01M0TXME3JN69YTB6KH14REXQ0
  • promiseAllWorkflow | wrun_41M0TX9M260GQZZSE6MFEN180K
  • sleepingWorkflow | wrun_41M0TXA9X50GGY770Y2EEHECAR
  • parallelSleepWorkflow | wrun_41M0TXABZS0GVK1BHSMNV17FQR
  • nullByteWorkflow | wrun_41M0TXAKNN0GYSH1708DP9T4A5
  • cancelRun - cancelling a running workflow | wrun_41M0TXFFQ30GGM70CKK2XY24F4
  • cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow | wrun_41M0TXFKEJ0GYZ7FSNCAWRQCAS
  • sleepInLoopWorkflow - sleep inside loop with steps actually delays each iteration | wrun_41M0TXFR9C0GYHNB4ARQHZPDEB
  • resilient start: addTenWorkflow completes when run_created returns 500 | wrun_41M0TXGA9F0GWFQJVD83BA886Y

⚠️ Flaky E2E Tests (passed on retry)

These tests failed at least once and passed on a retry. A recurring entry here is a real race worth investigating.

  • addTenWorkflow (fastify)
  • cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow (express)
  • cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow (fastify)
  • cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow (nextjs-turbopack)
  • cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow (sveltekit)
  • deploymentId: 'latest' is a no-op in non-Vercel worlds (nitro)
  • health check (CLI) - workflow health command reports healthy endpoints (nextjs-webpack)

🛠 Infra Events (absorbed by the harness)

Platform anomalies the e2e harness detected and worked around (e.g. a run the queue never picked up, replaced by a fresh run). Clustered timestamps indicate a backend blip; a steady drip indicates a platform issue worth escalating.

33 infra events
  • cold-start-warmup · suite warmup (python) · at 22:14:27Z · abandoned wrun_41M0TXA19Q0GH1J3Y2EW9WG46F · (+7 more)
  • run-pickup-stall · nullByteWorkflow (python) · at 22:14:44Z · abandoned wrun_41M0TXDP100GT4XKXFXYV71DSH
  • run-pickup-stall · promiseAllWorkflow (python) · at 22:14:44Z · abandoned wrun_41M0TXDP0Q0GZYYA7ZDRGGJA68
  • run-pickup-stall · parallelSleepWorkflow (python) · at 22:14:44Z · abandoned wrun_41M0TXDP0W0GYH5W24RMBY21HV
  • run-pickup-stall · sleepingWorkflow (python) · at 22:14:44Z · abandoned wrun_41M0TXDP0W0GYH5W24RMBY21HT
  • run-pickup-stall · cancelRun - cancelling a running workflow (python) · at 22:14:44Z · abandoned wrun_41M0TXDPFC0GHW1V0180EMGDPR
  • run-pickup-stall · cancelRun - cancelling a running workflow (python) · at 22:15:17Z · abandoned wrun_41M0TXEPD20GX5YYYDG2CQ37J3
  • run-pickup-stall · parallelSleepWorkflow (python) · at 22:15:44Z · abandoned wrun_41M0TXFHGC0GSENEEXWFVA074Z
  • run-pickup-stall · sleepingWorkflow (python) · at 22:15:45Z · abandoned wrun_41M0TXFHKK0GP7MVBJZRZMFW32
  • run-pickup-stall · nullByteWorkflow (python) · at 22:15:45Z · abandoned wrun_41M0TXFHHF0GZDCYV0JJ01N4E1
  • run-pickup-stall · promiseAllWorkflow (python) · at 22:15:45Z · abandoned wrun_41M0TXFHSQ0GGJW6TZHDV15ATA
  • cold-start-warmup · suite warmup (tanstack-start) · at 22:15:52Z · abandoned wrun_01M0TXFDQZ8WXQDS9E45YEBYH6
  • run-pickup-stall · cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow (python) · at 22:16:35Z · abandoned wrun_41M0TXFPJ10GS2HW7Q867WQMZC
  • cold-start-warmup · suite warmup (python) · at 22:16:53Z · abandoned wrun_01M0TXEFP85TCPNYAYR8TY1Y40 · (+7 more)
  • run-pickup-stall · deploymentId: 'latest' is a no-op in non-Vercel worlds (python) · at 22:17:08Z · abandoned wrun_01M0TXJ4TFHJ86EGW0KGENRM7Y
  • run-pickup-stall · sleepingWorkflow (python) · at 22:17:08Z · abandoned wrun_01M0TXJ4TNGJGHK49GWZEAADDE
  • run-pickup-stall · nullByteWorkflow (python) · at 22:17:08Z · abandoned wrun_01M0TXJ4TSKRC6XB4EKDBKJN5B
  • run-pickup-stall · promiseAllWorkflow (python) · at 22:17:08Z · abandoned wrun_01M0TXJ4TGDZHWQN3N38ZK4YM6
  • run-pickup-stall · parallelSleepWorkflow (python) · at 22:17:08Z · abandoned wrun_01M0TXJ4TQVFVW4Q3680M4Y3YR
  • run-pickup-stall · promiseAllWorkflow (python) · at 22:18:08Z · abandoned wrun_01M0TXKZE8NZ2EHPBANV9CRQCG
  • run-pickup-stall · parallelSleepWorkflow (python) · at 22:18:08Z · abandoned wrun_01M0TXKZEBQ34X5H03SZ5CZ2W7
  • run-pickup-stall · sleepingWorkflow (python) · at 22:18:08Z · abandoned wrun_01M0TXKZEA1D0AC5J3JQJG0618
  • run-pickup-stall · deploymentId: 'latest' is a no-op in non-Vercel worlds (python) · at 22:18:08Z · abandoned wrun_01M0TXKZECF9BAPB2DV2VQYC0D
  • run-pickup-stall · nullByteWorkflow (python) · at 22:18:08Z · abandoned wrun_01M0TXKZEKNW5707N28P78J01A
  • run-pickup-stall · cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow (python) · at 22:18:16Z · abandoned wrun_41M0TXJEEJ0GY1C81002C4XBVW
  • run-pickup-stall · sleepInLoopWorkflow - sleep inside loop with steps actually delays each iteration (python) · at 22:18:16Z · abandoned wrun_41M0TXJ9CZ0GHZRCHZRDGND5ZQ
  • run-pickup-stall · cancelRun - cancelling a running workflow (python) · at 22:19:08Z · abandoned wrun_01M0TXNT1ZX13ABFTBM4VXY9BY
  • run-pickup-stall · sleepInLoopWorkflow - sleep inside loop with steps actually delays each iteration (python) · at 22:19:08Z · abandoned wrun_01M0TXNT24JHTDHTJV93DRHE35
  • run-pickup-stall · cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow (python) · at 22:19:08Z · abandoned wrun_01M0TXNT229W66AJBETF8B5G5Q
  • run-pickup-stall · cancelRun - cancelling a running workflow (python) · at 22:19:38Z · abandoned wrun_01M0TXPQDTHE4J5M8ZP7MFT3Q1
  • run-pickup-stall · cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow (python) · at 22:19:38Z · abandoned wrun_01M0TXPQDXG40MJAF3JHHXW6V1
  • run-pickup-stall · sleepInLoopWorkflow - sleep inside loop with steps actually delays each iteration (python) · at 22:20:08Z · abandoned wrun_01M0TXQMN7M6AEASP0GQ565TYN
  • run-pickup-stall · hookWithSleepWorkflow - hook payloads delivered correctly with concurrent sleep (nextjs-webpack) · at 22:21:14Z · abandoned wrun_01M0TXSMZ7H5XH2W54KESZQV30

E2E Test Summary

Summary
Passed Failed Skipped Total
❌ ▲ Vercel Production 3570 8 742 4320
✅ 💻 Local Development 3922 0 558 4480
✅ 📦 Local Production 3922 0 558 4480
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres 3922 0 558 4480
✅ 🪟 Windows 320 0 0 320
❌ 🌐 Cross-language Conformance 0 9 132 141
✅ vercel-http-transport 817 0 143 960
✅ vercel-multi-region 27 0 0 27
✅ vercel-ws-transport 553 0 87 640
Total 17053 17 2778 19848
Details by Category

❌ ▲ Vercel Production

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-node 132 0 28
✅ astro-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ example-node 132 0 28
✅ example-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ express-node 132 0 28
✅ express-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ fastify-node 132 0 28
✅ fastify-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ hono-node 132 0 28
✅ hono-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ nest-node 132 0 28
✅ nest-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ nextjs-turbopack-node 157 0 3
✅ nextjs-turbopack-quickjs 157 0 3
✅ nextjs-webpack-node 157 0 3
✅ nextjs-webpack-quickjs 157 0 3
✅ nitro-node 132 0 28
✅ nitro-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ nuxt-node 132 0 28
✅ nuxt-quickjs 132 0 28
❌ python-node 0 8 152
✅ sveltekit-node 151 0 9
✅ sveltekit-quickjs 151 0 9
✅ tanstack-start-node 132 0 28
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ vite-node 132 0 28
✅ vite-quickjs 132 0 28

✅ 💻 Local Development

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ astro-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ express-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ express-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ fastify-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ fastify-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ hono-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ hono-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nest-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nest-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-node 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-quickjs 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-node 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-quickjs 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-node 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-quickjs 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-node 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-quickjs 160 0 0
✅ nitro-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nitro-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nuxt-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nuxt-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ sveltekit-stable-node 153 0 7
✅ sveltekit-stable-quickjs 153 0 7
✅ tanstack-start-node 134 0 26
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ vite-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ vite-stable-quickjs 134 0 26

✅ 📦 Local Production

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ astro-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ express-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ express-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ fastify-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ fastify-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ hono-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ hono-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nest-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nest-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-node 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-quickjs 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-node 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-quickjs 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-node 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-quickjs 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-node 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-quickjs 160 0 0
✅ nitro-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nitro-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nuxt-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nuxt-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ sveltekit-stable-node 153 0 7
✅ sveltekit-stable-quickjs 153 0 7
✅ tanstack-start-node 134 0 26
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ vite-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ vite-stable-quickjs 134 0 26

✅ 🐘 Local Postgres

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ astro-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ express-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ express-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ fastify-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ fastify-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ hono-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ hono-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nest-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nest-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-node 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-quickjs 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-node 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-quickjs 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-node 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-quickjs 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-node 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-quickjs 160 0 0
✅ nitro-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nitro-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nuxt-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nuxt-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ sveltekit-stable-node 153 0 7
✅ sveltekit-stable-quickjs 153 0 7
✅ tanstack-start-node 134 0 26
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ vite-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ vite-stable-quickjs 134 0 26

✅ 🪟 Windows

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack-node 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-turbopack-quickjs 160 0 0

❌ 🌐 Cross-language Conformance

App Passed Failed Skipped
❌ python 0 9 132

✅ vercel-http-transport

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ example 132 0 28
✅ express 132 0 28
✅ hono 132 0 28
✅ nextjs-turbopack 157 0 3
✅ nitro 132 0 28
✅ vite 132 0 28

✅ vercel-multi-region

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack 27 0 0

✅ vercel-ws-transport

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ example 132 0 28
✅ express 132 0 28
✅ nextjs-turbopack 157 0 3
✅ vite 132 0 28

📋 View full workflow run

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Aug 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
example-nextjs-workflow-turbopack Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 24, 2026 10:12pm
example-nextjs-workflow-webpack Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 24, 2026 10:12pm
example-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 24, 2026 10:12pm
workbench-astro-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 24, 2026 10:12pm
workbench-express-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 24, 2026 10:12pm
workbench-fastify-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 24, 2026 10:12pm
workbench-hono-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 24, 2026 10:12pm
workbench-nestjs-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 24, 2026 10:12pm
workbench-nitro-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 24, 2026 10:12pm
workbench-nuxt-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 24, 2026 10:12pm
workbench-python-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 24, 2026 10:12pm
workbench-sveltekit-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 24, 2026 10:12pm
workbench-tanstack-start-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 24, 2026 10:12pm
workbench-vite-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 24, 2026 10:12pm
workflow-docs Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 24, 2026 10:12pm
workflow-swc-playground Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 24, 2026 10:12pm
workflow-tarballs Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 24, 2026 10:12pm
workflow-web Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 24, 2026 10:12pm

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Workflow Benchmarks

commit ac59df1 · Mon, 24 Aug 2026 22:35:00 GMT · run logs

Backend: vercel · app: nextjs-turbopack

Metric Scenario Best (ms) P75 (ms) P90 (ms) P99 (ms) Samples
TTFS step 1306 (+31%) 🔻 1392 🔴 (+26%) 🔻 1428 🔴 (+24%) 🔻 1461 🔴 (+17%) 🔻 30
TTFS stream 351 (-50%) 💚 1360 🔴 (+24%) 🔻 1383 🔴 (+25%) 🔻 1489 🔴 (+16%) 🔻 30
TTFS hook + stream 1219 (-11%) 1694 🔴 (+15%) 🔻 1731 🔴 (+15%) 5919 🔴 (+271%) 🔻 30
Fan-out TTFS Promise.all(100 steps) 549 (-16%) 💚 1897 (+11%) 1944 (+8.7%) 2000 (+2.8%) 10
Fan-out TTLS Promise.all(100 steps) 2183 (+13%) 4689 (+48%) 🔻 4731 (+44%) 🔻 9124 (+7.6%) 10
STSO 1020 steps (inline) 116 (+10%) 167 (+13%) 188 (+12%) 399 (+83%) 🔻 1019
WO 1020 steps 163048 (+10%) 163048 (+10%) 163048 (+10%) 163048 (+10%) 1
CRTT first chunk (pooled) 104 (+18%) 🔻 161 (+30%) 🔻 197 (+2.1%) 351 (-43%) 💚 28

Streams

Scenario CRTT 1st p75 p90 p99 CDV max iters
paced control (100/s, 60B) 157 (+39%) 181 (+39%) 282 (+33%) 4380 (+475%) 176 (+23%) 10
size sweep (100/s, 160B-12KB) 118 (+4%) 163 (+15%) 233 (+25%) 740 (-34%) 122 (-11%) 10
replay gateway-gpt-5.4-nano-2000t (1x) 112 (-9%) 694 (+6%) 3332 (+1%) 4864 (+2%) 465 (+114%) 3
replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (1x) 133 (+13%) 127 (-5%) 160 (-5%) 300 (-13%) 235 (-10%) 2
replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (2x) 170 (+38%) 171 (-7%) 230 (-13%) 457 (-17%) 193 (-15%) 3
📈 STSO distribution vs main (inline / queue-hop histograms)

1020 steps (inline)

Cumulative STSO time: main 147417ms → this run 162868ms (Δ +15451ms, +10%)

  100-150 ms  ████████████████┃███████  main 785  this 558  -227
  150-200 ms  ███████░░░░┃              main 216  this 382  +166
  200-250 ms  █┃                        main  14  this  51   +37
  250-300 ms  ┃                         main   4  this  11    +7
  300-350 ms  ┃                         main   0  this   4    +4
  350-400 ms  ┃                         main   0  this   3    +3
  400-450 ms  ┃                         main   0  this   3    +3
  450-500 ms  ┃                         main   0  this   1    +1
  500-550 ms  ┃                         main   0  this   3    +3
  700-750 ms  ┃                         main   0  this   1    +1
  850-900 ms  ┃                         main   0  this   1    +1
1050-1100 ms  ┃                         main   0  this   1    +1
📈 CRTT drill-down vs main (RTT distributions & profiles)
variant  RTT 1ms→5s+              avg         p50         p90           p99     n
control  ······▃█▂·▁▂·  416.5 (+247%)  123 (+16%)  282 (+33%)  4380 (+475%)  3000
sweep    ······▃█▁▁···     141 (+14%)  122 (+11%)  233 (+25%)    740 (-34%)  3000
gw 1x    ·····▁▇█▁▁▁▁▁    344.8 (+3%)   103 (+2%)  3332 (+1%)    4864 (+2%)  5295
eve 1x   ·····▁▇█▁····    112.9 (+2%)  104 (+14%)   160 (-5%)    300 (-13%)  5186
eve 2x   ·····▁▃█▂▁···    137.6 (-2%)   130 (+1%)  230 (-13%)    457 (-17%)  7779

RTT over stream progress (avg per tenth of stream, bars scaled min→max):

control  ▁██▇▆▅▅▄▃▃  249–537ms
sweep    ▅▄▃▃▁▁▂▄█▇  122–168ms
gw 1x    ▁▁▁▃█▅▂▁▁▁  102–1356ms
eve 1x   ▄▃▂▂▂▂█▇▁▂  102–135ms
eve 2x   ▂▁▃▁▁▃▅█▄▄  114–189ms

RTT by chunk size (avg per log size bin, ~160B → ~12KB serialized, bars scaled min→max):

sweep  ▃▂▆█▇▅▁  139–142ms

Delivery jitter over stream progress (avg positive CDV per tenth of stream, bars scaled min→max):

control  █▂▁▃▁▂▂▁▁▁  39–100ms
sweep    ▁▃▆▅▅▆█▄▆▂  46–62ms
gw 1x    ▂▂▂█▁▁▂▂▁▁  29–65ms
eve 1x   ▄▅▁▁█▄█▄▅▇  20–25ms
eve 2x   ▆▇▄▁▄▆▆▃▄█  19–26ms
📜 Previous results (1)

fdeae36

Mon, 24 Aug 2026 21:28:37 GMT · run logs

vercel / nextjs-turbopack

Metric Scenario Best (ms) P75 (ms) P90 (ms) P99 (ms) Samples
TTFS step 1316 (+32%) 🔻 1425 🔴 (+29%) 🔻 1476 🔴 (+28%) 🔻 1501 🔴 (+20%) 🔻 30
TTFS stream 332 (-53%) 💚 1403 🔴 (+28%) 🔻 1480 🔴 (+34%) 🔻 1527 🔴 (+19%) 🔻 30
TTFS hook + stream 1269 (-7.6%) 1648 🔴 (+12%) 1690 🔴 (+12%) 1752 🔴 (+9.8%) 30
Fan-out TTFS Promise.all(100 steps) 648 (±0%) 1939 (+13%) 2000 (+12%) 2106 (+8.2%) 10
Fan-out TTLS Promise.all(100 steps) 2017 (+4.4%) 3634 (+14%) 3657 (+11%) 8990 (+6.0%) 10
STSO 1020 steps (inline) 109 (+3.8%) 142 (-4.1%) 159 (-5.4%) 226 (+3.7%) 1019
WO 1020 steps 141034 (-4.4%) 141034 (-4.4%) 141034 (-4.4%) 141034 (-4.4%) 1
CRTT first chunk (pooled) 110 (+25%) 🔻 174 (+40%) 🔻 345 (+79%) 🔻 401 (-35%) 💚 28

Streams

Scenario CRTT 1st p75 p90 p99 CDV max iters
paced control (100/s, 60B) 165 (+46%) 174 (+34%) 314 (+48%) 447 (-41%) 140 (-2%) 10
size sweep (100/s, 160B-12KB) 133 (+18%) 185 (+30%) 305 (+63%) 455 (-60%) 158 (+15%) 10
replay gateway-gpt-5.4-nano-2000t (1x) 157 (+28%) 146 (-78%) 188 (-94%) 437 (-91%) 199 (-8%) 3
replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (1x) 130 (+10%) 159 (+19%) 196 (+16%) 348 (+1%) 235 (-10%) 2
replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (2x) 158 (+28%) 234 (+28%) 328 (+25%) 468 (-15%) 199 (-13%) 3
ℹ️ Metric definitions & methodology

Streams: first-chunk RTT (the stream-open path, before any buffering/backpressure), CRTT percentiles, and worst delivery stall (CDV max). Cells are medians across iterations; per-run values in the artifacts. No 🔴/🟢 marks until targets attach.

The collapsed STSO distribution section above buckets every step gap, split inline (same warm process — pure framework overhead) vs queue-hop (fresh process — dispatch, reinit, replay). = main, = this run, = fill.

The collapsed CRTT drill-down: per-variant RTT histograms (fixed log bins, · = empty) and mean RTT/positive-CDV profile lines over stream progress and chunk size. Histograms, avgs, and profiles merge exactly across runs; p50–p99 are percentile-of-percentiles. Per-index rows live in the artifacts.

Best/P75/P90/P99 deltas compare against the most recent benchmark run on main at the time of this run. 🔻 flags a delta worse than +15%, 💚 one better than −15%.

Metrics — TTFS: time to first step body (in-deployment start() → first step body) · Fan-out TTFS: fan-out time to first step (in-deployment start() → first of the parallel step bodies to complete) · Fan-out TTLS: fan-out time to last step (in-deployment start() → last of the parallel step bodies to complete, i.e. when the Promise.all resolves) · STSO: step-to-step overhead (gap between consecutive step bodies) · WO: workflow overhead (whole-run time outside step bodies, in-deployment anchored) · CRTT: chunk round-trip time (per-chunk write → read latency, one clock domain: deployment → stream backend → same deployment) · CDV: chunk delay variation / delivery jitter (inter-arrival gap minus inter-write gap per seq-adjacent pair; skew-free; the row is each run's MAX positive value, so one stall moves it)

Scenarios — step: one trivial no-op step, no stream; no hooks, so the run stays in turbo mode (in-process fast path) · stream: one streaming step; no hooks, so the run stays in turbo mode (in-process fast path) · hook + stream: registers a hook before one step, which exits turbo mode (dispatch path) · 1020 steps: 1020 trivial sequential steps; STSO is measured between consecutive steps in the given step ranges, and WO is the whole-run overhead outside step bodies · Promise.all(100 steps): 100 trivial no-op steps started together in a single Promise.all; Fan-out TTFS is the first of them to complete and Fan-out TTLS the last, both from the in-deployment clientStart, so their gap is the spread the runtime adds across the fan-out · paced control (100/s, 60B): the control: 300 tiny (~60B) deltas metronome-paced at 100/s — zero workload structure, so it reads the transport floor and flush cadence, and disambiguates transport-wide vs workload-specific when a replay row moves · size sweep (100/s, 160B-12KB): same pacing as the control with deltas padded in rotation across seven log-spaced sizes (~160B–12KB) — rotation decouples size from stream position, so it isolates whether chunk size causes latency · replay gateway-gpt-5.4-nano-2000t (1x): raw provider SSE cadence captured at the AI gateway boundary (gpt-5.4-nano, the most popular gateway model; per-token deltas p50 208B = the modal production chunk size), replayed exactly as measured — the typical customer's workload; its CDV is the typical customer's real delivery jitter · replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (1x): a captured eve turn (gpt-5.6-sol, the most-used demanding eve model; ~2000 output tokens = production p50 turn length) replayed exactly as measured — eve's envelope protocol re-ships the cumulative message so sizes ramp 142B→13KB; the demanding outlier tenant's reality · replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (2x): the same eve capture at 2x — the headroom/stress row; real fast-tier models emit the same chunk sizes at proportionally higher rate, so time compression is a faithful speed model · first chunk (pooled): every run's seq-0 RTT pooled across all stream scenarios — the first chunk precedes any workload differentiation, so pooling samples one shared stream-open path with exact percentiles

Replay cadences (semantic sha256) — eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t eaf22f5946e7c61f3c65c7006d550df180cfabd4e706254a09f22aec0cfb420d · gateway-gpt-5.4-nano-2000t 6f24ac518b6b83ff1d0e85a5fe78230db192716d66a7fc6b2fe022752001d041

🔴 marks a percentile over its target (within target is left unmarked). Targets (p75/p90/p99, ms) — TTFS 200/300/600

All timestamps are deployment-side; runs are triggered in-deployment, so the CI runner and api.vercel.com sit outside every measured window. TTFS = start() → first step body (includes dispatch + any cold start); Fan-out TTFS/TTLS = first/last step completion of one Promise.all from the same anchor (the gap is the runtime’s fan-out spread); STSO/WO between step bodies; CRTT inside the workflow (excludes the api.vercel.com read path).

Cold starts stay in the numbers (real bursty-workload latency, inflates P75+); Best is the warm floor.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Sim World

Simulated world deterministic testing for races. Traces

🟠 world-sim scenario book — 1 fail of 41 total

fence=per-spec

scenario outcome events virt replay violations
smoke-no-steps completed 3 0ms ok 0
smoke-one-step completed 6 0ms ok 0
hook-at-step-started completed 12 0ms ok 0
hook-at-step-completed completed 12 0ms ok 0
hook-at-hook-created completed 12 0ms ok 0
deadline-hook-wins completed 7 1.0h ok 0
deadline-expires completed 7 1.0h ok 0
long-sleep completed 11 30.0d ok 0
hook-never-arrives stalled 3 0ms skipped 0
step-retries-twice completed 10 2.0s ok 0
parallel-steps completed 9 0ms ok 0
hook-on-execution-state completed 12 0ms ok 0
peek-hook-before-branch completed 12 0ms ok 0
peek-hook-after-branch completed 12 0ms ok 0
peek-hook-at-registration completed 12 0ms ok 0
race-hook-before-probe completed 12 0ms ok 0
race-hook-after-probe completed 12 0ms ok 0
race-duplicate-delivery completed 13 0ms ok 0
attr-hook-before-step completed 11 0ms ok 0
attr-hook-after-step completed 11 0ms ok 0
attr-from-step-body completed 13 0ms ok 0
fork-hook-after-timeout completed 14 1.0m ok 0
fork-hook-before-timeout completed 14 1.0m ok 0
count-hook-after-timeout completed 17 1.0m ok 0
count-hook-before-timeout completed 20 1.0m ok 0
stale-read-step-count-fork completed 20 1.0m ok 0
stale-read-equal-step-counts completed 14 1.0m ok 0
step-vs-step-fork completed 12 0ms ok 0
step-vs-step-fork-fenced completed 12 0ms ok 0
fence-catches-benign-direction completed 12 5ms ok 0
in-flight-before-decision completed 17 1.0m ok 0
in-flight-before-decision-counted completed 17 1.0m ok 0
in-flight-after-decision completed 19 2.0m ok 0
stale-read-step-count-fork-fenced completed 20 1.0m ok 0
fork-hook-wins completed 13 1.0m ok 0
fork-timeout-wins completed 13 1.0m ok 0
unclaimed-payload-under-fork completed 17 1.0m ok 0
claimed-payload-under-fork completed 17 1.0m ok 0
writers-independent-step-bodies completed 12 0ms ok 0
writers-scripted-tempo completed 12 0ms ok 0
cancel-mid-step cancelled 7 0ms skipped 0

Full trace: world-sim.txt

Signed-off-by: Alex Langenfeld <alex.langenfeld@vercel.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant