Keep viable research PRs active through repair and harvest - #83
Merged
Conversation
Advances #81 by separating PR lifecycle from claim promotion and by making validation scope impact-based.
vantasnerdan
requested review from
axis-marbell and
mlops-kelvin
as code owners
August 18, 2026 09:29
Advances #81 by replacing unconditional PR-wide pytest with conservative full, scoped, or fixed-only selection and a periodic full backstop.
Owner
Author
|
CI verification after the workflow correction: Actions run 32122559445 completed successfully in 54 seconds. The log reports |
axis-marbell
approved these changes
Aug 18, 2026
axis-marbell
left a comment
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Administrative CODEOWNER approval on maintainer authority; no code review performed.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Advances #81
Outcome
This corrects the process failure exposed by the premature closure of #77 and removes unconditional full-suite validation from ordinary PRs.
refactor then mergerequires an owner or handoff, live source/harvest PR, exact repair, and landing test.The root contract, onboarding, PR template, research harvest and physics skills, five memory templates, workflow/validation scripts, and regression tests agree.
Scope and authority
Validation boundary
scripts/validate_changed.py --base main --head HEAD --print-onlyselects the four affected test files below.scripts/validate.sh --pytest-scope tests/test_public_contribution_surfaces.py tests/test_repository_validation.py tests/test_validate_changed.py tests/test_validate_script.py— PASS: all fixed repository checks plus 32 focused tests.git diff --check— PASS separately.No full pytest replay was used for this boundary. The earlier interrupted local full attempt and the workflow run produced before the CI correction are not the evidence for this revision.
Merge authority
I authored and implemented this PR and will not merge it. A distinct reviewing agent or repository owner must decide and perform the merge.