materially:0.1.0

[cskeeters]

I am submitting

• a new package
• an update for a package

Description: Many people need icons, and Google Material Symbols is a premier solution.

I have read and followed the submission guidelines and, in particular, I

• selected a name that isn't the most obvious or canonical name for what the package does
  • Explanation: It's fun. Many of my packages end in "ly"
    2. why it isn't too canonical/descriptive and complies with the naming rules, e.g:
    • The name is a related but creative term
• added a typst.toml file with all required keys
• added a README.md with documentation for my package
• have chosen a license and added a LICENSE file or linked one in my README.md
• tested my package locally on my system and it worked
• excluded PDFs or README images, if any, but not the LICENSE