feat(adapter): add Adapter.Reset() for in-process recovery

[retr0h]

Summary

Adds Reset() to *Adapter on darwin and linux. Reset tears down the underlying transport-specific state (CoreBluetooth managers on darwin, D-Bus handles on linux) so a subsequent Enable() rebuilds them from scratch.

Depends on #445 (Enable callable after first invocation) — once that lands I'll rebase and remove this note.

Motivation

There's currently no API to throw away adapter state and start fresh on the same *Adapter. Useful for:

• Recovery flows that hit a stale CBPeripheral handle on an otherwise-healthy central (Connect blocks forever waiting for a delegate callback that will never arrive — Reset breaks the deadlock).
• Switching between adapters in long-running processes.
• Cleanup in tests.

What it does

• cancels in-flight scan via existing StopScan
• drains pending Connect waiters via close(ch) so callers unblock and return an error rather than parking on a callback that a fresh central will never deliver
• replaces cm / pm with fresh cbgo.NewCentralManager(nil) / cbgo.NewPeripheralManager(nil); ARC reclaims the old ones
• zeros per-Adapter channels and handlers (poweredChan, scanChan, peripheralFoundHandler)

After Reset, calling Enable() again is required to set up fresh delegates and wait for powered-on. This relies on Enable's poweredChan-cleanup behavior in #445, which is why the two PRs are stacked.

Honest about the limits

The doc comment is explicit about what Reset does not do:

Reset is NOT a complete CoreBluetooth state reset. Some framework-level state (notably the advertisement-deduplication table that suppresses repeated DidDiscoverPeripheral callbacks for already-known UUIDs) is held by CoreBluetooth at the process level and survives recreating the CBCentralManager. The only reliable way to clear that state is process exit. If you're trying to recover from "a peripheral I previously scanned won't reappear in subsequent Scans," Reset is unlikely to help on its own.

I empirically validated this in a real recovery flow: after a long macOS sleep, ~20 Reset cycles over 10 hours never restored the ability to re-discover a known peripheral. The dedup table outlives any in-process API we have access to. Recovery from that specific failure mode requires self-exec or a subprocess BLE helper — out of scope for this library.

That said, Reset still has a useful niche:

• Adapter switching (multiple adapters on the same machine).
• Stale CBPeripheral handles on a central that's otherwise healthy.
• Test isolation between scenarios.

Linux

Mostly a no-op — BlueZ is naturally per-call and doesn't carry the kind of cached peripheral state that wedges CoreBluetooth — but keeps the API symmetric so callers can write platform-agnostic recovery code.

Caller contract

Caller MUST ensure no Scan / Connect / DiscoverServices is in flight when Reset is called — there is no internal locking. Documented in the comment. The intended usage pattern is:

session goroutine errors out
caller calls adapter.Reset()
caller calls adapter.Enable()
caller starts a fresh session

Verification

• go build . clean on darwin/arm64
• Behavior validated against a Meshtastic peripheral: pre-Reset, an in-process retry after a stale CBPeripheral handle hangs forever in Connect. Post-Reset, Connect returns an error from the closed connectMap channel, the caller logs it and retries the full scan-and-connect path on the new central.

Backwards compatibility

Purely additive. Existing callers see no change.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[deadprogram]

Thank you for working on this @retr0h a couple quick things.

Any new functions should be added to the interface definitions. Also at least no-op versions added to all platforms. We've been trying to get the consistency improved.

Also, perhaps slightly briefer on the comments, if you please. 😸

Thanks!

[retr0h]

Thank you for working on this @retr0h a couple quick things.

Any new functions should be added to the interface definitions. Also at least no-op versions added to all platforms. We've been trying to get the consistency improved.

Also, perhaps slightly briefer on the comments, if you please. 😸

Thanks!

@deadprogram I've gone ahead and implemented your corrections. Let me know if you need anything else.

[deadprogram]

Thank you very much for the useful addition @retr0h and the quick update. Now squash/merging!