fix(codex): drop inherited fork replay#34
Draft
drewstone wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
task_started.started_atto the new session timestamp.Root cause
Forked Codex rollouts prepend inherited history with timestamps rewritten to the new session time.
The adapter treated every replayed row as fresh work, inflating token trajectories, tool counts, subagent adoption, and reaction analysis.
The original
task_started.started_atvalue survives replay and uniquely identifies the current task boundary.Measured impact
On completed session
019f59ed-ddf1-7e80-a93e-b5f81822cb7f:The existing internal-context classification from #33 remains active; the new adapter regression verifies a post-fork
<codex_internal_context source="goal">message is retained but labeled injected, while a real follow-up remains human.Checks
pnpm test— 114/114 passedpnpm typecheckpnpm buildpnpm check:packagetraces analyze