-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 111
Rework directory block enumeration accounting #97
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
RoyWFHuang
wants to merge
1
commit into
sysprog21:master
Choose a base branch
from
RoyWFHuang:bug/dir_walk_accounting
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+16
−8
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
P2: The removal path's inner loop now terminates and gets its “full extent coverage” entirely from the on-disk file-count counters (
eblock->extents[ei].nr_filesanddirblk->nr_files) instead of the structural extent lengthee_len. Under consistent counters this works, but those counters are the very metadata being mutated during removals, and if they ever fall out of sync with the actual entries — e.g. a block whosedirblk->nr_filesis 0 while it still holds the entry being unlinked, or an extent count larger than the sum of its per-block counts — the loop either reaches 0 early and silently skips the block that contains the target (sosimplefs_remove_from_dirreturns success-without-removal, leaving a stale directory entry / failed unlink/rename), or it never reaches 0 and keeps wrappingbithrough the ring (CHECK_AND_SET_RING_INDEX(bi, ee_len)) re-reading blocks indefinitely, i.e. an unbounded loop / soft lockup. The previousee_lenbound guaranteed termination and that every physical block in the extent was visited regardless of the counters. Consider retaining a hard cap alongside the counter so an inconsistent counter can only cause a bounded miss rather than a hang.Prompt for AI agents