Skip to content

feat(cli): bundle pg-delta for database workflows - #6102

Open
avallete wants to merge 9 commits into
developfrom
feat/upgrade-pg-delta-next
Open

feat(cli): bundle pg-delta for database workflows#6102
avallete wants to merge 9 commits into
developfrom
feat/upgrade-pg-delta-next

Conversation

@avallete

@avallete avallete commented Aug 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Runs pg-delta and pg-topo in-process for diff, pull, and declarative schema workflows, enabled by default behind a shared strategy boundary.

The existing edge-runtime implementation remains available through SUPABASE_USE_PG_DELTA_NEXT=false, with no automatic fallback. New-engine snapshots and diagnostics use an isolated v2 artifact format, and migration rendering preserves execution-required transaction boundaries.

Dependencies are temporarily pinned to pg-toolbelt PR #299 at commit 951daa9 and should move to released versions after publication. Generated SQL may differ from the legacy renderer; the compatibility contract is successful execution and state convergence.

The current shared live harness does not provision project Postgres, so linked-project, TLS-required, and pooler/SNI acceptance still requires a provisioned data-plane environment.

@avallete
avallete requested a review from a team as a code owner August 6, 2026 07:15
@avallete avallete added the run-live-e2e-ci Execute the supabox live e2e tests and report back label Aug 6, 2026

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 8078b53b04

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

/** Reads the rollout flag once when the command-scoped layer is constructed. */
export const legacyPgDeltaEngineLayer = Layer.unwrap(
Effect.gen(function* () {
const raw = process.env[FLAG];

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Resolve the rollout flag from the project environment

When SUPABASE_USE_PG_DELTA_NEXT=false is defined only in supabase/.env, this layer is constructed before the handler loads project environment values and therefore always selects the default next engine. This also disagrees with legacyDbPushCore, which resolves the same flag through toml.envLookup, so one project can warm the legacy catalog during db push but still execute the next engine for db diff, db pull, generate, and sync. Resolve the selector from the project-aware environment so the documented opt-out behaves consistently.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Comment on lines +421 to +423
const rendered = libraries.renderPlanFiles(generatedPlan, {
allowDrops: input.allowDrops,
});

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Forward format options to the plan renderer

When a project configures [experimental.pgdelta].format_options, the next-engine diff and declarative-plan paths silently discard it: the engine inputs carry formatOptions, but the adapter inputs do not, and both renderer calls receive only allowDrops. Consequently db diff, migration-style db pull, and declarative sync ignore overrides such as lowercase keywords, indentation, or maximum width despite the command documentation promising that behavior; thread the parsed options through these adapter operations and into renderPlanFiles.

AGENTS.md reference: apps/cli/AGENTS.md:L483-L485

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

* Management API. The synchronous `docker info` probe is read-only and runs once
* when this helper module is collected.
*/
export const describeDockerLive = describe.skipIf(!hasDockerDaemon());

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Keep Docker live tests gated on the live environment

On any developer or CI host where Docker happens to be available, invoking the test:live target without live credentials now collects and runs this suite instead of leaving it inert, causing it to start a real local Supabase stack and run a scenario with a 15-minute timeout. The repository explicitly uses the configured live environment as the signal that these expensive suites may run, even for Docker-only commands, so this helper should retain that gate rather than probing Docker alone.

AGENTS.md reference: apps/cli/AGENTS.md:L438-L443

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Supabase CLI preview

npx --yes https://pkg.pr.new/supabase/cli/supabase@d4861957ee293c0a032283a30bd6e3d97112a01e

Preview package for commit d486195.

@avallete

avallete commented Aug 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Provisioned validation against exact head 4b697a2e5e0d5090ece6b319e6a1498db91afbcf: internal PG17 run.

  • Project provisioning reached the data plane, and the direct database endpoint connected over TLS with sslmode=require (SUPABASE_LIVE_DB_URL was set).
  • legacy-pgdelta-next.live.test.ts passed both tests: the full convergence scenario (260.2s) and explicit legacy opt-out smoke (25.8s).
  • The aggregate live project finished 19/22 tests. Its three failures were outside this PR's diff: an existing start-status timing assertion, an existing db-pull assertion, and an existing db-diff test colliding on host port 54320 while live files ran concurrently.

The labeled dispatch check itself cannot reach the internal repository because its GitHub App is not installed there, so this run was dispatched manually against the same SHA.

@avallete
avallete marked this pull request as draft August 6, 2026 08:12
@avallete
avallete marked this pull request as ready for review August 7, 2026 17:06
@avallete
avallete marked this pull request as draft August 7, 2026 17:07
Comment thread apps/cli/package.json
"@parcel/watcher": "^2.6.0",
"@supabase/api": "workspace:*",
"@supabase/config": "workspace:*",
"@supabase/pg-delta": "https://pkg.pr.new/supabase/pg-toolbelt/@supabase/pg-delta@ad62ae432865f67bb359a8183a2b3279fa9ebccb",

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟠 Severity: HIGH

Both @supabase/pg-delta (v1.0.0-alpha.33) and @supabase/pg-topo (v1.0.0-alpha.5) are sourced from pkg.pr.new, a third-party preview registry (StackBlitz), rather than the official npm registry. These pre-release packages are compiled into the CLI binary via bun build --compile and distributed to end users. They run in-process with direct access to user Postgres connection pools and can extract full database schemas. Shipping a production CLI binary with code from an ephemeral, unofficial PR-preview channel that has not been formally published to npm represents a supply-chain risk.
Helpful? Add 👍 / 👎

💡 Fix Suggestion

Suggestion: Replace the pkg.pr.new ephemeral preview-registry URLs for @supabase/pg-delta and @supabase/pg-topo with official npm registry version specifiers once the packages are formally published to npm. As acknowledged in the PR description, these are temporarily pinned to a PR-preview commit (pg-toolbelt PR #299 @ 951daa9). The resolution steps are: (1) Ensure the @supabase/pg-delta and @supabase/pg-topo packages are published to the official npm registry under the @supabase scope. (2) Replace lines 58–59 with proper semver specifiers, e.g. "@supabase/pg-delta": "^1.0.0-alpha.33" and "@supabase/pg-topo": "^1.0.0-alpha.5". (3) Do not ship a production CLI binary that bundles packages sourced from pkg.pr.new or any other ephemeral, unofficial preview channel, as those artifacts are not subject to the same security controls as the official npm registry.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

const exists = yield* fs.exists(w.path).pipe(

P2 Badge Detect collisions by migration version, not full path

When a multi-segment pg-delta plan is generated in the same second as an existing migration with a different name—or overlaps future-dated segments from a prior run—checking only w.path misses the collision because the filenames differ. This writes multiple files with the same 14-digit version; local migration loading accepts both, but schema_migrations.version is a primary key, so a pull can fail while repairing history and later push/reset operations can fail while applying the duplicate version. Check every candidate version against all existing migration filenames rather than only the generated pathname.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines +236 to +239
const shadow = yield* shadowService.provision({
schema: input.schema,
...(input.projectRef !== undefined ? { projectRef: input.projectRef } : {}),
});

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Avoid provisioning the unused declarative shadow for database diffs

With the supported [db] major_version = 15 and the default next implementation, every pg-delta db diff and migration-style db pull fails before comparing databases: this call provisions both shadows, the second shadow's setup rejects every major other than 17 in SetupPgDeltaNextDeclarativeShadowDatabase, yet this operation only reads shadow.migrationsUrl and never uses declarativeUrl. Provision only the migrated shadow for diffDatabase (and explicit migrations endpoints), reserving the two-shadow path for declarative planning, so ordinary database diffs continue to work for supported Postgres 15 projects.

AGENTS.md reference: apps/cli/AGENTS.md:L249-L257

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Comment on lines +78 to +82
migrationsPort, err := allocatePgDeltaNextPort(dependencies.freePort, 0)
if err != nil {
return PgDeltaNextShadow{}, err
}
migrationsContainer, err := dependencies.create(ctx, migrationsPort)

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Allocate shadow ports on the Docker daemon host

When the CLI runs in a dev container or uses a remote TCP DOCKER_HOST, dependencies.freePort calls GetFreeHostPort, which probes 127.0.0.1 in the CLI process's network namespace, while CreateShadowDatabase publishes the returned port on the Docker daemon's host. A port that is free locally can already be occupied on that host, causing either shadow container creation to fail nondeterministically even though utils.Config.Hostname otherwise supports connecting to that external host. Let Docker allocate each host port and inspect the resulting binding, or otherwise reserve ports in the daemon host's namespace.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@blacksmith-sh

This comment has been minimized.

@avallete
avallete marked this pull request as ready for review August 7, 2026 18:33
@avallete avallete removed the run-live-e2e-ci Execute the supabox live e2e tests and report back label Aug 7, 2026
Comment thread apps/cli/package.json
"@supabase/api": "workspace:*",
"@supabase/config": "workspace:*",
"@supabase/pg-delta": "https://pkg.pr.new/supabase/pg-toolbelt/@supabase/pg-delta@ad62ae432865f67bb359a8183a2b3279fa9ebccb",
"@supabase/pg-topo": "https://pkg.pr.new/supabase/pg-toolbelt/@supabase/pg-topo@ad62ae432865f67bb359a8183a2b3279fa9ebccb",

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟠 Severity: HIGH

@supabase/pg-topo is sourced from pkg.pr.new (StackBlitz ephemeral PR-preview registry), not the official npm registry. It runs in-process with direct Postgres pool access and is compiled into the distributed CLI binary, presenting the same unresolved supply-chain risk as @supabase/pg-delta.
Helpful? Add 👍 / 👎

💡 Fix Suggestion

Suggestion: Replace the ephemeral pkg.pr.new preview URL for @supabase/pg-topo (and the companion @supabase/pg-delta on line 58) with official npm registry version specifiers once the packages are published. The PR body acknowledges these pins are temporary (pending pg-toolbelt PR #299 publication). Until then, this PR should not be merged into a release branch, as the ephemeral preview tarball is sourced from an untrusted, non-audited registry and is compiled directly into the distributed CLI binary with in-process Postgres pool access. When @supabase/pg-topo is published to npm, replace line 59 with: "@supabase/pg-topo": "^<published-version>". Apply the same change to @supabase/pg-delta on line 58.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: d4861957ee

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

}
}

paths.sort((left, right) => left.name.localeCompare(right.name));

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Preserve bytewise declarative file ordering

When declarative filenames differ by case or non-ASCII characters, localeCompare applies locale-sensitive collation—for example, a.sql can sort before Z.sql—rather than the Go implementation's bytewise sort.Strings ordering. Because this ordered array is passed to planSchemaFiles, projects whose DDL files rely on lexical ordering can be loaded differently under the default next engine and fail or produce a different desired schema; use a locale-independent code-point comparison to preserve legacy behavior.

AGENTS.md reference: apps/cli/AGENTS.md:L483-L485

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Comment on lines +337 to +339
yield* rejectBlockingDiagnostic("declarativePlan", result.diagnostics);
return {
...normalizeNextDiff(result, debugDirectory),

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Reject skipped declarative statements

When planSchemaFiles cannot load a declarative statement and reports it through result.skipped—for example, an out-of-scope CREATE ROLE—this return path discards the skipped list and continues with the partial plan. If all requested statements are skipped, db schema declarative sync can even print No schema changes found, falsely implying that the migrations state matches the files; fail the operation or surface each skipped statement before accepting the plan.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant