chore: propagate blas/* JSDoc and cscal header fixes to siblings

[Planeshifter]

Description

Propagating fixes merged to develop between 2026-05-26 13:11 UTC and 2026-05-27 13:11 UTC to sibling packages.

blas/* scalar JSDoc descriptors

Propagates JSDoc fixes from 95a8c41a ("fix: use correct argument value in error message and propagate JSDoc fixes to sibling packages") to remaining blas/* packages where @param descriptors for alpha, beta, and related scalar arguments still read scalar rather than scalar constant. The fix is mechanical: every matching JSDoc line in the affected packages under blas/base, blas/base/wasm, and blas/ext/base has the trailing scalar replaced with scalar constant to align with the established convention.

Source: 95a8c41a

Target packages:

• blas/base/daxpy
• blas/base/dscal
• blas/base/gaxpy
• blas/base/saxpy
• blas/base/sscal
• blas/base/wasm/cscal
• blas/base/wasm/daxpy
• blas/base/wasm/dscal
• blas/base/wasm/saxpy
• blas/base/wasm/sscal
• blas/base/wasm/zscal
• blas/ext/base/sfill

Missing min_view_buffer_index.h include and stale header description

Propagates fixes from 7d900094 ("fix: import src utility and fix description in blas/base/cscal"), which corrected a missing stdlib/strided/base/min_view_buffer_index.h include in the cblas C source and a stale cblas_ccopy reference in the cblas header. blas/base/caxpy receives both corrections — the missing include in caxpy_cblas.c and the wrong cblas_ccopy description in caxpy_cblas.h; blas/base/zscal receives only the missing include fix in zscal_cblas.c, as its header description is already correct.

Source: 7d900094

Target packages:

• blas/base/caxpy
• blas/base/zscal

Misclassified VARIABLES section header

Propagates the fix from 4ed822d3 ("docs: follow-up fixes for commits merged to develop on 2026-05-26"), which corrected // VARIABLES // section headers that contained only require() calls to // MODULES //. The same misclassification was present in blas/ext/base/dapx (lib/dapx.js) and ndarray/find-last (lib/callback_wrapper.js), neither of which had a preceding // MODULES // section. Both headers are renamed accordingly.

Source: 4ed822d3

Target packages:

• blas/ext/base/dapx
• ndarray/find-last

Related Issues

None.

Questions

No.

Other

Validation

• Each source commit was specified into a pattern with a concrete search signature, then candidate sites were enumerated under the in-scope namespaces (blas/*, ndarray/*) via rg and verified individually before patching.
• Per-site verification: each target file was read in full to confirm the defect is present (e.g., that a // VARIABLES // block contains only require() calls and lacks a preceding // MODULES // section; that a cblas C source actually calls stdlib_strided_min_view_buffer_index() without the corresponding header include; that the BLAS JSDoc line uses the bare scalar descriptor in a @param alpha/@param beta slot).
• Style consistency: replacements preserve indentation, leading * JSDoc markers, and surrounding lines verbatim. No unrelated lines were touched.
• Deliberately excluded:
  • assert/* candidates for the "Return a boolean indicating" → "Boolean indicating" pattern from 95a8c41a — the source fix applied to a module exporting a constant boolean, whereas the matching signbit/is-buffer-length-compatible* modules export functions, so the original wording is grammatically correct at those sites.
  • @returns input array → @returns \x`from4ed822d` — too broad a scope and a stylistic convention rather than a defect; defer to a dedicated cleanup PR.
  • The chisquare doc example variable rename from fdcf93d0 — site-specific and not present at sibling distribution packages.
  • The time/iso-weeks-in-year Notes section from 3b5ee6b3 — single-package documentation, no clear sibling target.
  • The bernoulli/mgf isProbability inline refactor from 3c1e93d7 — adaptive and would require cross-package judgment; deferred.
  • The stats/strided/*abs "Compute" → "Calculate" descriptor refresh from ba77943b — descriptor choice is per-package and not uniformly converged across stats/strided/*.

Checklist

• Read, understood, and followed the contributing guidelines.

AI Assistance

When authoring the changes proposed in this PR, did you use any kind of AI assistance?

• Yes
• No

If you answered "yes" above, how did you use AI assistance?

• Code generation (e.g., when writing an implementation or fixing a bug)
• Test/benchmark generation
• Documentation (including examples)
• Research and understanding

Disclosure

This PR was authored by Claude Code as part of a routine fix-propagation pass over commits merged to develop in the prior 24 hours. Source commits were identified mechanically; candidate sites were enumerated by rg over a per-pattern search signature, then individually validated by reading each target file in full before patching. All patches are direct, self-contained analogs of the cited source commits.

---

@stdlib-js/reviewers

---

Generated by Claude Code

[stdlib-bot]

Coverage Report

Package	Statements	Branches	Functions	Lines
blas/base/caxpy	$\color{green}368/368$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}17/17$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}4/4$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}368/368$ $\color{green}+100.00%$
blas/base/daxpy	$\color{green}420/420$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}30/30$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}4/4$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}420/420$ $\color{green}+100.00%$
blas/base/dscal	$\color{green}389/389$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}26/26$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}4/4$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}389/389$ $\color{green}+100.00%$
blas/base/gaxpy	$\color{green}307/307$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}25/25$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}3/3$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}307/307$ $\color{green}+100.00%$
blas/base/saxpy	$\color{green}425/425$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}30/30$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}4/4$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}425/425$ $\color{green}+100.00%$
blas/base/sscal	$\color{green}389/389$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}26/26$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}4/4$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}389/389$ $\color{green}+100.00%$
blas/base/wasm/cscal	$\color{green}694/694$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}17/17$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}6/6$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}694/694$ $\color{green}+100.00%$
blas/base/wasm/daxpy	$\color{green}637/637$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}17/17$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}6/6$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}637/637$ $\color{green}+100.00%$
blas/base/wasm/dscal	$\color{green}604/604$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}17/17$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}6/6$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}604/604$ $\color{green}+100.00%$
blas/base/wasm/saxpy	$\color{green}637/637$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}17/17$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}6/6$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}637/637$ $\color{green}+100.00%$
blas/base/wasm/sscal	$\color{green}608/608$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}17/17$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}6/6$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}608/608$ $\color{green}+100.00%$
blas/base/wasm/zscal	$\color{green}694/694$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}17/17$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}6/6$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}694/694$ $\color{green}+100.00%$
blas/base/zscal	$\color{green}400/400$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}17/17$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}4/4$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}400/400$ $\color{green}+100.00%$
blas/ext/base/dapx	$\color{green}388/388$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}26/26$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}4/4$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}388/388$ $\color{green}+100.00%$
blas/ext/base/sfill	$\color{green}391/391$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}26/26$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}4/4$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}391/391$ $\color{green}+100.00%$
ndarray/find-last	$\color{green}416/416$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}44/44$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}5/5$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}416/416$ $\color{green}+100.00%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.