[beta] backports - #160714
Conversation
(cherry picked from commit facc787)
(cherry picked from commit cb797b8)
fastmod --fixed-strings '#[splat]' '#[rustc_splat]'
fastmod --fixed-strings '`splat` attribute' '`rustc_splat` attribute'
fastmod --fixed-strings '$splat$' '$rustc_splat$'
fastmod 'v0(.*)#\[rustc_splat\]' 'v0${1}#[splat]' tests/ui/splat/splat-mangling.rs
(cherry picked from commit e574edf)
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
(cherry picked from commit bc1bb27)
Mitigation for [RUST-159429]. The recurring problem is that built-in attributes are treated differently compared to ordinary prelude attributes, built-in attributes, even while unstable, can name-collide with stable macro re-exports of the same name (and proc-macro helper attributes of the same name), which can break stable code. See [RUST-134964]. [RUST-159429]: rust-lang#159429 [RUST-134963]: rust-lang#134963 (cherry picked from commit 0a0f6df)
(cherry picked from commit 44d291e)
To account for the renamed `#[rustc_unroll]` attribute. (cherry picked from commit 91ee1f3)
This stderr diff is a funny side-effect of renaming `#[unroll]` => `#[rustc_unroll]`, where the `#[rustc_unknown]` attribute name is just similar enough edit distance wise to `#[rustc_unroll]` that `#[rustc_unroll]` shows up as a plausible suggestion candidate, lol. (cherry picked from commit 945d2f3)
(cherry picked from commit d1265b7)
|
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=1 |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain enhanced) (plain) Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot) |
|
💔 Test for 8ba9fdd failed: CI. Failed job:
|
|
Ah right this problem, there was a pr some time ago to fix this by mirroring the artifacts, we should cherry pick that pr |
|
Hmm, if you mean #158774, beta already has that. I also found mirror changes in #158802 and #158734 which aren't on beta, although those don't touch the target that failed here. They might still be needed though? (obviously not the whole LLVM upgrade) The problem file in the log is |
|
Hmmm I indeed meant #158774... |
|
Those are not going to help for |
|
I wanted to start mirroring the artifacts but I cannot reproduce it locally by running |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
[beta] backports try-job: dist-powerpc64-linux-musl
|
@bors retry |
cfg_select!rustfmt: Discover modules viacfg_select!#158372#[unroll]=>#[rustc_unroll]to mitigate nameres ambiguity Rename#[unroll]=>#[rustc_unroll]to mitigate nameres ambiguity #160211r? me