feat: Use absolute FQDNs to simplify name resolution#1223
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Oliver Gondža <ogondza@gmail.com>
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
Important Review skippedReview was skipped due to path filters ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
CodeRabbit blocks several paths by default. You can override this behavior by explicitly including those paths in the path filters. For example, including ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository YAML (base), Organization UI (inherited) Review profile: CHILL Plan: Enterprise Run ID: You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughUpdated three Go dependency pins and revised OpenShift end-to-end TLS/Redis command assertions, including the Redis service hostname format and multiline expectation formatting. ChangesDependency and validation updates
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes Suggested reviewers: 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Comment |
Signed-off-by: Oliver Gondža <ogondza@gmail.com>
What type of PR is this?
What does this PR do / why we need it:
Have you updated the necessary documentation?
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #?
Test acceptance criteria:
How to test changes / Special notes to the reviewer:
No functional changes are expected. Just reduced number of DNS queries.