Skip to content

[build] Update sbt-tpolecat to 0.5.7#147

Open
scala-steward wants to merge 1 commit into
rayrobdod:mainfrom
scala-steward:update/sbt-tpolecat-0.5.7
Open

[build] Update sbt-tpolecat to 0.5.7#147
scala-steward wants to merge 1 commit into
rayrobdod:mainfrom
scala-steward:update/sbt-tpolecat-0.5.7

Conversation

@scala-steward

@scala-steward scala-steward commented Jun 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

About this PR

📦 Updates org.typelevel:sbt-tpolecat from 0.5.5 to 0.5.7

📜 GitHub Release Notes - Version Diff

Usage

Please merge!

I'll automatically update this PR to resolve conflicts as long as you don't change it yourself.

If you'd like to skip this version, you can just close this PR. If you have any feedback, just mention me in the comments below.

Configure Scala Steward for your repository with a .scala-steward.conf file.

Have a fantastic day writing Scala!

⚙ Adjust future updates

Add this to your .scala-steward.conf file to ignore future updates of this dependency:

updates.ignore = [ { groupId = "org.typelevel", artifactId = "sbt-tpolecat" } ]

Or, add this to slow down future updates of this dependency:

dependencyOverrides = [{
  pullRequests = { frequency = "30 days" },
  dependency = { groupId = "org.typelevel", artifactId = "sbt-tpolecat" }
}]
labels: library-update, sbt-plugin-update, early-semver-minor, semver-spec-patch, version-scheme:early-semver, commit-count:1

@rayrobdod rayrobdod added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Jul 7, 2026
@scala-steward scala-steward force-pushed the update/sbt-tpolecat-0.5.7 branch from 7e20a68 to 362254e Compare July 8, 2026 19:11
@scala-steward scala-steward force-pushed the update/sbt-tpolecat-0.5.7 branch from 362254e to f2fce9a Compare July 12, 2026 21:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants