Fixes the build failure when configuring with POLYSOLVE_LARGE_INDEX=ON#113
Open
Chenyang-Joe wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Fixes the build failure when configuring with POLYSOLVE_LARGE_INDEX=ON#113Chenyang-Joe wants to merge 1 commit into
Chenyang-Joe wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Apple Accelerate and MKL Pardiso only support 32-bit sparse indices and fail to compile against the 64-bit (std::ptrdiff_t) StiffnessMatrix used when POLYSOLVE_LARGE_INDEX is enabled. Disable Accelerate via CMake, and exclude the MKL Pardiso solvers under POLYSOLVE_LARGE_INDEX (mirroring the existing UmfPack handling), so the large-index build succeeds.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
With large indices, StiffnessMatrix uses 64-bit (std::ptrdiff_t) indices, but two of the wrapped direct solvers are 32-bit int-only and fail to compile against it:
This PR only makes the large-index build compile — it does not add large-index support to those solvers (that's future work). SuperLU has the same int-only limitation and is left untouched here.
Testing
@maxpaik16 PTAL! Thanks