-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 182
fix: clearer unequal-split language and prevent silent save failure #676
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
krokosik
merged 7 commits into
oss-apps:main
from
mvanhorn:fix/645-2026-06-12-1741-fix-unequal-split-silent-save
Aug 4, 2026
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e5dd9d4
fix: clearer unequal-split language and prevent silent save failure
mvanhorn be38464
fix: address CI failures
mvanhorn f2ba2c1
fix: address self-review findings
mvanhorn 137b779
chore: drop unneeded jest.config env tweak (CI sets SKIP_ENV_VALIDATION)
mvanhorn caa4f29
fix: address review feedback on unequal-split messaging
mvanhorn dd70674
i18n: move invalid_split under errors
mvanhorn 1b4f9d2
fix: disable Save while the split is unsettled
mvanhorn File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -296,9 +296,7 @@ export function calculateParticipantSplit( | |
| ...p, | ||
| amount: 0n === getSplitShare(p) ? 0n : amount / BigInt(totalParticipants), | ||
| })); | ||
| canSplitScreenClosed = Boolean( | ||
| Object.values(splitShares).find((p) => 0n !== p[SplitType.EQUAL]), | ||
| ); | ||
| canSplitScreenClosed = 0 < totalParticipants; | ||
| break; | ||
| case SplitType.PERCENTAGE: | ||
| updatedParticipants = participants.map((p) => ({ | ||
|
|
@@ -371,6 +369,14 @@ export function calculateParticipantSplit( | |
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if ( | ||
| canSplitScreenClosed && | ||
| 1 < participants.length && | ||
| updatedParticipants.every((p) => 0n === (p.amount ?? 0n)) | ||
| ) { | ||
| canSplitScreenClosed = false; | ||
| } | ||
|
Comment on lines
299
to
+379
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Care to explain why do you need to refactor such a huge chunk of the core logic? AFAIK all you want is to check an additional edge case, where all the participant.amount fields are zero. |
||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return { ...state, participants: updatedParticipants, canSplitScreenClosed }; | ||
|
|
||
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.