OSDOCS-18179-bug-batch-oc-4-22 RNs#112589
Merged
JoeAldinger merged 1 commit intoJun 2, 2026
Merged
Conversation
openshift-ci
Bot
added
the
size/S
|
🤖 Mon Jun 01 20:40:25 - Prow CI generated the docs preview: |
wgabor0427
force-pushed
the
OSODCS-18179-bug-batch-oc-4-22
branch
from
787343e to
f31bdf8
Compare
openshift-ci
Bot
added
the
needs-rebase
wgabor0427
force-pushed
the
OSODCS-18179-bug-batch-oc-4-22
branch
from
f31bdf8 to
df0b7ba
Compare
openshift-ci
Bot
removed
the
needs-rebase
wgabor0427
force-pushed
the
OSODCS-18179-bug-batch-oc-4-22
branch
from
df0b7ba to
c295391
Compare
|
@wgabor0427: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
Contributor
Author
|
/label merge-review-needed |
openshift-ci
Bot
added
the
merge-review-needed
JoeAldinger
added
merge-review-in-progress
JoeAldinger
reviewed
Jun 2, 2026
|
|
||
| * Before this update, the `oc adm node-image create` command attempted to contact `quay.io` first instead of using the mirror registry when generating a discovery ISO for node addition in disconnected environments. As a consequence, in environments with strict firewall restrictions, the `node-joiner` process hung waiting for a connection to `quay.io`, even though all necessary images existed in the `ImageContentSourcePolicy` (ICSP) or `ImageDigestMirrorSet` (IDMS) configuration. With this release, the `oc` client directly references mirrors defined in ICSP or IDMS before attempting to contact external registries. As a result, discovery ISO creation succeeds in disconnected environments where a proxy responds on behalf of `quay.io`, but `quay.io` itself cannot be reached. (link:https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/OCPBUGS-64840[OCPBUGS-64840]) | ||
|
|
||
| * Before this update, when using the `oc expose service` command with the `--labels` option to create a Route, the command ignored the custom labels. As a consequence, the resulting route resource used the service selector as its labels instead of the labels specified in the `--labels` option. With this release, the `oc expose service` command correctly applies custom labels from the `--labels` option to the route resource. (link:https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/OCPBUGS-74543[OCPBUGS-74543]) |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| * Before this update, when using the `oc expose service` command with the `--labels` option to create a Route, the command ignored the custom labels. As a consequence, the resulting route resource used the service selector as its labels instead of the labels specified in the `--labels` option. With this release, the `oc expose service` command correctly applies custom labels from the `--labels` option to the route resource. (link:https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/OCPBUGS-74543[OCPBUGS-74543]) | |
| * Before this update, when using the `oc expose service` command with the `--labels` option to create a route, the command ignored the custom labels. As a consequence, the resulting route resource used the service selector as its labels instead of the labels specified in the `--labels` option. With this release, the `oc expose service` command correctly applies custom labels from the `--labels` option to the route resource. (link:https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/OCPBUGS-74543[OCPBUGS-74543]) |
JoeAldinger
reviewed
Jun 2, 2026
Contributor
JoeAldinger
left a comment
JoeAldinger
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
/lgtm small typo maybe you could fix in another bug batch PR. Up to you though.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Version(s):
4.22
Issue:
https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/OSDOCS-18179
Link to docs preview:
https://112589--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/release_notes/ocp-4-22-release-notes.html#rn-ocp-release-note-oc-fixed-issues_release-notes
QE review:
Additional information: