OSDOCS-19962: Add Claude skill for porting docs to downstream

[ShaunaDiaz]

Version(s):
main only

Issue:
OSDOCS-19962

Link to docs preview:
N/A

QE review:
N/A

Additional information:
Internal Claude skills for testing with RHCL documentation. These skills are being ported in from the private Kuadrant developer tools repository. The review is a sanity check (that I won't break the repo; that the folder structure looks reasonable, etc.). Reviewing the skills themselves is out of scope.

can be updated according to https://github.com/Kuadrant/dev-team-plugin/pull/44#event-26274565944

[ocpdocs-previewbot]

🤖 Tue Jun 02 12:43:06 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://112575--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/

[openshift-ci-robot]

@ShaunaDiaz: This pull request references OSDOCS-19962 which is a valid jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

Version(s):
main only

Issue:

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

• QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci]

@ShaunaDiaz: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[stevsmit]

There's nothing here that can really be reviewed without testing. My only suggestion here would be to rename the commands if they're RHCL specific. For example, I noticed that the port-docs-to-downstream skill is just /port-docs-to-downstream. This is probably fine and no one else would likely use it, but if any of the other commands are RHCL specific maybe they could be renamed?

not sure if providing a link to - IBM Style: https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/ibm-style will actually do anything (does it?) since we have to be on VPN to access it. For Cursor we've kicked around a few ways to get reviews done against the style guide, including downloading the copy in a certain folder and adding a line to the command so that it runs against that folder (rather than copying the IMBSG into the repo like I wish we could do).

Anyways this LGTM. Probably just let Kathryn know you're including this and get their ack.