Improve README organization, navigation, and documentation flow#3526
Improve README organization, navigation, and documentation flow#3526MRThugh wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
- Add a structured table of contents - Reorganize sections into a more logical reading flow - Introduce a key features overview - Improve installation guidance - Refine formatting and visual hierarchy - Preserve existing examples and documentation - Add quick links to documentation and examples
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 725e5227a6
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
| import openai | ||
| print(openai.__version__) | ||
| ``` | ||
| This package follows [SemVer](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0.html) conventions. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This rewrite drops the documented caveat that some backwards-incompatible changes may ship in minor versions and now states plain SemVer instead. Users deciding whether a minor-version upgrade is safe can read this as a stronger compatibility promise than the SDK policy previously made, so keep the exception list or qualify the sentence as generally following SemVer.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
1 participant
Summary
This pull request reorganizes the project README to improve readability, navigation, and overall documentation flow while preserving the existing technical content and examples.
The goal is to make the documentation easier to scan and navigate for both new and existing users without changing the documented behavior of the SDK.
What's Changed
Notes
I'm happy to make any adjustments if there are documentation conventions or organizational preferences that should be followed. Thank you for taking the time to review this contribution.