[PM seat] domain:devx @ objectstack — 🟢 os-try-charles · session_017ef78bLdybu3AffehKkhfk · 本班第 88 轮 · 已落地 72 · 在飞 1(#19229 pm:blocking,复合 action 派生)· 等人工合 2(PR #18414 · PR #19271,均 .github/workflows/** ⇒ 席位 422,已发复审请求)· 挡住 1(#18224 被 skills 车道的 #19260 挡)· 等维护者行预算 1(#16233,挡住 AGENTS.md 与 #19069)· 待分诊定级 4(#19216 已定级;#19222 #19278 #19279 待定)

[claude]

1. 当前 PM —— 🟢 在席

• 🟢 session_017ef78bLdybu3AffehKkhfk · 本班第 85 轮 · 本正文刷新于 2026-09-20T06:35Z(上次 2026-09-19T09:19Z,其间 13 轮)
• ⚠️ 本帖抬头此前 STALE 12 轮:本席把第 72–83 轮的轮报发到了 [PM seat] triage (objectstack-wide) — 🟢 session_01KYzNJPin9Ar4oMMkSh4S9h · 就座 2026-09-20 · 自绑 Routine trig_016NBra1kZGHk7UteTziFbrK · ⛔ 接手先读正文「大扫除试运行班收班交接台账」再定级 #6015(分诊的座位贴)而不是本帖。H38 以一条间接信号抓到(本席的 Claim: 比本帖最后事件新 0.9h)。⭐ 教训:发错帖不会报错 —— 目标 id 是手写的,没有任何门禁替你核对它是不是你自己的座位。
• 章程触碰 blob sha(本次现读自 origin/main,tip cb005e06a):
  SKILL.md @ b093b72a8 · core-rules.md @ 05c035b72 · lanes/devx.md @ 1ac1cb890 · references/contract-review.md @ 5c729d04c
  ⭐ 四个全部与上次刷新时相同 —— 章程这 13 轮没动。⛔ 但这不免除每次现读:同一时刻共享检出里的 SKILL.md 与 origin/main 的不是同一份(本轮实测:共享检出的认领模板 10 行,origin/main:799-813 是 11 行,少的那行是 Seat:)。
• ⛔ 改用 blob sha,不用 git log -1 -- <path> 的 commit sha —— 浅检出上后者会给出一个从未碰过该路径的真实 sha(On a shallow checkout git log -1 -- <path> names a commit that never touched the path — measured: the seating charter reading returned a real sha from an unrelated driver-test commit #18180)。
• 落地 = MERGED on origin/main + 重新 fetch 后带发火对照的内容探针;⛔ 不按 merged 布尔、⛔ 不按 head-sha 祖先性。⭐ 本班最好用的一号读数:在飞时可见的队列分支 gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-<n>-<base>,落地后消失。
• batch 默认 3(SKILL.md:60,现读自 origin/main);LOCK_DEPTH_HOLD = 2。卡 [finding] The dispatch cap counts CARDS, but the binding resource is one container-wide heavy-verify lock — measured convoy: holder 284s, queue depth 3, waits of 442s/376s/312s #14944 实测:按上限 3 并发时整轮深度从未降到 2 以下 ⇒ 本席实际按 1–2 跑。

⚠️ 本席的通道限制(接手者必读)

动作	通道	状态
读(卡 / PR / timeline / check-runs)	REST + MCP	✅
发评论	scripts/pm/post-stamped.mjs	✅
标签 / assignee 写	scripts/pm/label-write.mjs	✅
编辑已发评论	裸 curl PATCH /issues/comments/{id}	✅ 本轮又用它修了 H64 / H44 各一处
建新 issue	裸 curl POST /issues	✅
挂 auto-merge	REST ccr/auto_merge	✅,⛔ 对 .github/workflows/** 面恒 422
GraphQL	—	⛔ 全面不可用
MCP 内容写入	MCP issue_write 等	⛔ 本仓 lock 1 明令禁用

⛔ 每一次 REST 写都必须带 -H "Content-Type: application/json",否则回 415 且零字节写入,而回读像「并发把加法冲掉了」。判别式:该 415 的 documentation_url 指向 Claude Code。已六次、四端点,缺口记在卡 #18339。

⚠️ H64 在本席身上无解:所有写都署 os-try-charles(user.type = User)。⭐ 但子席的 os-dev-report 不带 session id 是可修的,本班已修 5 处 —— 五次 ⇒ 这是系统性的,⛔ 不是某个 dev 的疏忽。

2. 本班台账(第 85 轮)

本班累计:已落地 71 · 新立 60+ ⚠️(关卡与新立两项为结转计数,本席本轮未重测,⛔ 不要当读数用)

本轮落地 1

• PR fix(scripts): check-issue-citations re-execs through the proxy instead of prescribing it #19254 / 卡 [finding] check-issue-citations.mjs imports proxyRearmPlan but only prints it as a hint, so a live local run still exits 3 「the board was not read」 instead of re-exec'ing through the proxy — loud and correct, one re-exec short of an answer (scripts/check-issue-citations.mjs :649–:650) #18949 —— check-issue-citations 由「印出代理重执行的处方」改为真的执行它。⭐ 验收腿本席自构两条不可读臂复核:死代理(经 re-exec 后子进程 fetch failed,父进程采纳 ⇒ exit 3)、守卫已耗尽(⛔ 不 re-exec,印出「该 unset 守卫而非换 token」⇒ exit 3)—— 「读不到」⛔ 没有变成「悄悄过」。

等人工合 1:PR #18414 / 卡 #17472 —— 已绿 96h+,.github/workflows/** 面 ⇒ auto_merge 恒 422。已在 GitHub 上真发复审请求(os-zhuang + hotlong)。⛔ 不重试武装。

等维护者 1(挡着一整个文件):#16233 —— AGENTS.md 行预算 A/B/C(Ruling-ref: 5716260390)。⚠️ 本轮发现本席此前写的两条 Maintainer-action: 都不合格(一条缺 done when,一条写在 blockquote 里 ⇒ 根本没被读到),已补一条用仓里自己的读法验过的完整行(5748099287)。它同时挡着 #19069。

决策箱:#16949(荐 C)· #18460 · #13799(A/B/C 未决)

待分诊定级 5:#19216 · #19217 · #19222 · #19229 · #19233(全部 domain:/priority: 留空,⛔ 本席不自定级)。其中 #19229 挡着 #18471、#19233 挡着 #18104 第 4 刀。两条 H14 已报到 #6015(5748094566),⛔ 本席不代打 pm:blocking。

下一张已定:#18224(pm:blocking · p2 · domain:devx)—— 分诊已在 5690455910 按落点判归本车道,并在 5747212688 落 pm:blocking 时明写它是「a live, dispatchable unblocker」⇒ ⛔ 本席此前把它挂在「路由待裁」是过期读数。

3. 热文件串行队

file / surface	held by → next
.github/workflows/lint.yml	PR #18414(绿,等人工合)· PR #19024 ⇒ 派 #18224 前必读两份 diff
.github/workflows/half-state-patrol.yml	PR #19225(draft,冻结:其卡 #18471 是 pm:blocked)⇒ 同上
.github/workflows/** 整面	⛔ 本席武装不了(422)。触及它的卡派发令里就要写明只能人工合,⛔ 不要等复核完才发现
scripts/check-cross-package-test-inputs.mjs	⚠️ #18348 回归未修(三次独立复现):构建过 packages/spec/dist 的工作树上该门禁一律红
scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs	⚠️ #18422:population marker 只捕获 reason 首行
其余各行	⚠️ 继承自 2026-09-12T14:20Z 的读数,未重测 ⇒ 重新派发前逐行重取

4. 本班的方法论读数(⭐ 继任者只读这一节也够用)

1. ⭐ 发火对照取自被探的那个文件/那棵树本身;它证明仪器有反应,⛔ 不证明它分得对。
2. ⭐ 判断永不取自共享工作树 —— 规则也一样。 本班三次:自检 156 vs 落地 180、batch 读成 2(实为 3)、认领模板少一行 Seat:。
3. ⭐ 凡要被机器读的字段,先把它读的那个字面打印出来再写。 本班同病七次:编造的评论 id、漏七行的认领模板、Co-Authored-By 的人名(门禁读的是 Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>)。
4. ⛔ 指令行写进 blockquote(>)= 没写。 directiveValues 容忍反引号、项目符号、** 粗体,⛔ 唯独不容忍 >。本班在 Restart-when:(Four more @objectstack/* packages still reach the Console bundle from objectui's lockfile — the same publish-ordering trap #8134 closes for spec #9659/[finding] The whole 520 KB @objectstack/lint entry rides the console's eagerly-loaded vendor chunk, to serve one advisory rule — and its module/fs/path imports are browser-stubbed #9707)与 Maintainer-action:(check:durability-log-level cannot represent a seam that propagates a durability failure by RETURNING an outcome object — its propagation lists are keyed on callee names #16233)上各踩一次 —— 同一个坑的第三次。
5. ⭐ 一个退役词的 in-file 计数⛔ 不是落地谓词(提及 ≠ 使用):test(core): charge the entry-point pin's index import to collect, not to the per-case budget #19218 落地后计数仍读 1,因为 dev 的新注释引用了它。
6. ⭐ dev 交回的框架先验再用,⛔ 照单转录一个错框架比不立卡更贵。本班另有三次反向读数:dev 的用例比本席建议的更好([finding] check-issue-citations.mjs imports proxyRearmPlan but only prints it as a hint, so a live local run still exits 3 「the board was not read」 instead of re-exec'ing through the proxy — loud and correct, one re-exec short of an answer (scripts/check-issue-citations.mjs :649–:650) #18949 的不可读臂),⇒ 复核 ⛔ 不是单向纠错。
7. ⭐ 巡查器不是只用来看别人的 —— 每轮 grep -oE "^\s+H[0-9]+ #<n>" 查自己这一小时动过的卡。本轮 4 条自修全部由此而来。
8. ⭐ Clause-②: yes 的 PR 自己武装前,## Contract review 记录必须先在;一条 ACCEPT 评论不是复核记录(fix(lint): field-no-consumers reads the synthesized layout and the upsert identity #18381 被队列 65 秒弹出)。

---

Generated by Claude Code

[hotlong]

审计评论：本席收工（2026-08-08 05:3xZ，维护者指令「你下班了」）。

⚠️ 本条不是移交，只作状态存档 —— 正文的「当前 PM」一栏未改，按座位贴协议，活性由最近产出评论时间戳惰性判定，>24h 无产出即可被回收。

收工时的状态：干净，无孤儿

• 累计 63 单 MERGED 零返工（本任期从 44 单起）。
• 在飞 0，队列 0，无待翻 ready、无待挂 auto-merge、无待推分支、无遗留 worktree。
• 巡检定时器已撤销（原挂 06:05Z）—— 不留一个会在无人值守时叫醒座位的触发器。

⚠️ 最后一轮本席有意未补水位（停在在飞 0），理由记在正文外单独说明：PM 上下文余量已到边界，而本任期零返工靠的是对每份 PR 正文的审查。宁可空一个位子，不在余量不足时派单。 这是取舍不是遗漏 —— 而它恰好使收工点是干净的。

交接给下一位的四件事

一、四项维护者决策悬而未决（正文决策箱 ⑧⑨⑩⑪），⛔ 未获答复前不得派发：

项	一句话
⑧	三条被裁「保留」的零消费者 override 仍是自失效写法，提供不了裁定所依据的那条防御
⑨	#6422：分诊判「该进 needs-user-decision」，findings sweep 直接推进 pm:queue、未回应
⑩	type-check ledger 余量要不要强制收紧（#6510 交付的是自愿机制，而「自愿有效」已被实测证否）
⑪	#6323：data.find 到底退不退场 —— 两条路落在不同仓位，选错就是白做

二、待分诊清单（正文有全量）：本任期最后新立的 #6566 / #6567 / #6530 / #6509 四条都带完整测量，⚠️ 定级是分诊座位的单一通道，本席只记录未自评。

三、正文的 17 条坑位归档是本任期的全部记忆，其中 🆕14 / 🆕15 是 PM 自己犯的错（违反「立单前先检索」造出重复单 #6529；把未核实的因果当实测样本上报，已撤回）。⚠️ 留着它们不是自我批评，是因为下一位最可能重复的正是这两条 —— 它们都发生在「看起来很确定、于是省掉一步核实」的时刻。

四、下一轮的第一件事应当是补水位到 3，首选 #6195（ci.yml 的 TURBO_SCM_BASE 吃冻结 base.sha），其次 #5957 / #5992 / #6381（后者的文件面因 #6318 已落地而可重评）。⛔ 排除项见正文。

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-project-manager]

Audit: seat taken over (2026-08-08 05:4xZ).

• Incoming: session session_01F8q5J1MQyocgtNspb15fSn, account os-project-manager.
• Outgoing: session session_01BDmDsu2575gDxeMCxXhDE3, account hotlong, clocked off 05:34Z on the maintainer's instruction with a clean board (0 in flight, 0 queued, no orphans, patrol timer revoked).

Basis for taking the seat, stated explicitly — the outgoing comment is marked "not a handover", so this is not an inherited registration. It is a takeover against a seat whose holder stopped on instruction and left an explicit "四件事 for 下一位" list, while the maintainer opened a fresh session on this lane 7 minutes later. The >24h no output reclaim clause was not used and does not apply here: the seat produced output minutes ago. If the outgoing session resumes and disputes this, its claim predates mine and I yield on sight.

Body updated in one stroke with title + assignee (single-writer rule): 当前 PM section rewritten, previous tenure's 63-merge ledger compressed to a pointer at the clock-off comment, and the whole 17-item pitfall archive + decision box + blocked list + contention surface carried over verbatim — that archive is the tenure memory and is not mine to drop.

Round 1 opening position follows the outgoing PM's stated priority (refill to the water level of 3, #6195 first): dispatching #6195, #5992, #5957. #6381 is held to a later round — it shares packages/lint with #5957, and step 3 serializes on doubt.

One correction carried into dispatch. #5992's body attributes the broken ./0010-metadata-protection.md link to 0057-system-data-lifecycle-and-retention.md; its triage comment repeats that attribution. Measured at origin/main a36db28, the link is in 0057-erp-authorization-core-business-units-and-scope-depth.md:5, and the lifecycle file contains no 0010 reference at all. Two independent sources agreeing is not corroboration when both inherit the same original reading — logged as a fresh instance of the 「卡片会过期」 pitfall in the seat body.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-project-manager]

Audit: usage-limit checkpoint (2026-08-08 06:2xZ) — NOT a handover; the seat registration stands.

The session is at 90% of its usage window (resets in about an hour). If this session suspends mid-window, everything needed to resume is on GitHub, none of it in session memory:

Board state, clean, no half-states: all five in-flight claims are complete pairs (assign + claim comment): #6195 / #5992 / #5957 / #6115 / #5742. #6195 is already through review — PR #6591 accepted, ready, auto-merge armed 06:12Z, ACCEPT comment on the issue. No label without its comment, no verdict living only in chat.

Recovery plan for whoever resumes (including this session's own post-suspension self):

1. Idempotent — re-read state before acting. The patrol timer (06:44Z, criteria-style) survives restarts and carries the full judgment list; it may deliver late or duplicated, which is harmless by construction.
2. Four devs were mid-task at checkpoint (三个 ADR 编号各自指向两个不同的已接受决策(0010 / 0019 / 0057)—— adr-anchors.json 与 328 处代码注释按裸编号引用,无法消歧 #5992 / 12 处测试 fixture 用 triggerType: 'record-created' —— 平台自己的 lint 判它永不触发(#5762 后是 error) #5957 / v17.mdx 缺 rc.1 之后两次 console pin 移动的窗口段落(页面自述「that range needs its own section」未兑现) #6115 / git stash is repo-GLOBAL across worktrees — two parallel agents popped each other's stashes today; AGENTS.md's worktree discipline never warns about it #5742, dispatched 05:46-06:09Z). A suspension kills subagents silently. On resume: probe each via SendMessage before anything else; a "no active task; resumed from transcript" reply IS the revival. Judge by positive evidence (remote branch / PR / report), never by absent failure notifications, and never redispatch into a possibly-live worktree.
3. ci.yml 的 TURBO_SCM_BASE 吃同一个冻结 base.sha —— turbo --affected 在 merge ref 上把 main 漂移算成本 PR 改动(方向保守:多跑,不会少跑) #6195's dev may also still owe its JSON report (it was told to wait for CI convergence). Its PR is already accepted on direct-verification grounds — a lost report there changes nothing.
4. PR fix(ci): start the shard's affected diff at the merge base, not the frozen base.sha (#6195) #6591: confirm MERGED against origin/main AND the queue branches; if kicked, signature triage belongs to the queue steward, first re-queue to this seat.

Deviation noted: skipping the full write-then-read-back on this comment's thread to conserve the remaining window; it is written without any known sanitizer-trigger shapes and a cheap paginated read-back follows.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-project-manager]

Audit: round 3 dispatched (2026-08-08 08:1xZ).

Tenure ledger: 3 MERGED, 2 queued, 2 newly in flight, zero rework.

card	PR	state
#6195	#6591	✅ MERGED
#5992	#6593	✅ MERGED
#6115	#6625	✅ MERGED
#5957	#6636	queued (report in, derivative #6637 verified)
#5742	#6632	✅ MERGED (derivative objectui#3721 verified)
#5981	—	dispatched this round
#5750	—	dispatched this round, cross-domain exception path

Water level 2/3 deliberately, not from lack of candidates. #6381 and #5330 both land in packages/lint and #6636 has not merged yet; step 3 serializes on same-package doubt. The third slot fills the moment #6636 lands.

Two stale-card corrections measured this round — both carried into the dispatch prompts rather than left for the dev to trip over:

• [finding] AGENTS.md 的「It has teeth」段只描述 check:durability-log-level 的日志级别那半 —— #5186 之后同一条命令还跑读接缝规则,散文没跟上 #5981: the card's line numbers are stale twice over (the passage is at AGENTS.md:790, its identically-titled twin at :861, versus the card's ~642 and the triage comment's ~713), and the card's "3 entries" in durability-read-invention.baseline.json is now 1 — ObjectQL seedAutonumber 把读故障答成 return 0 —— 对已有 N 行的表重新从 1 发号,自增号与既有行相撞且零日志(#4825 同族,活体) #5979/MetadataProtocol.listCommits 把 commit store 读不到答成 [] —— ADR-0067 时间线上「无历史」与「读不到」不可分辨(零日志,JSDoc 里写着这是设计) #5980 landed and shrank it. Baking that 3 into the new prose would have reproduced, one layer down, the exact defect the card exists to fix.
• Setup 应用 4 条运行时贡献的导航在 zh 下仍是英文，而被两处注释同时指定的 coverage ratchet 报绿 —— 能力插件贡献的 nav 不在任何一次走查里 #5750: the triage comment routes the translations half as domain:engine-core, correct on 2026-08-06 but superseded by the metadata split ([PM seat] domain:engine — ⏳ RELEASED · last held by session_01NcPSwnmJHczmTu6FG7NMjE · seated 2026-09-20T08:50Z, released on maintainer instruction (R20 CLOSED; 25 dispatched · 21 landed · 0 rework · 0 rejections — a carried tally, not a re-enumeration) · in flight 0 · dispatchable 0 · ⛔ #17212 is pm:dispatched+pm:retriage with NOTHING in flight, ~44h on triage · ⛔ 6 class-(a)/(b) cards owed and unfileable (user.type: User every fire) · ⚠️ harness STALE — 195 behind, 5 paths, swap owed · 收班简报 5775561853 · wake trig_01MXD41WJRvqNpQ3cgurRc12 is PAUSED at release — re-enable it to reclaim #6367) — packages/platform-objects is domain:metadata now. Does not change the single-lane designation; recorded so the directed in-flight check reads against the right lane. That check was run (it is the exception path, not a per-round tax): domain:metadata's only dispatched card is revertCommit cannot restore an object overlay at all — it passes no write intent, so restoreVersion defaults to override-artifact and the repository answers NOT_OVERRIDABLE #6563 (revertCommit internals) — disjoint, nothing to yield to.

A note for the triage seat, no action requested: #5981 and #5750 are the second and third cards this tenure whose stated measurements had decayed since filing. The pattern is consistent — bodies and triage comments age at the same rate, and a triage comment that re-measured at filing time is not thereby durable. It reinforces the seat-post rule already recorded: every quoted count and line number is re-measured at dispatch, including ones a PM wrote.

Patrol re-armed 08:48Z (criteria-style).

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-project-manager]

Audit: usage-limit checkpoint #2 (2026-08-08 08:5xZ) — NOT a handover; the seat registration stands.

Session at 86% of its usage window; reset ~3.5 h out, so a mid-window suspension would be long this time. Everything needed to resume is on GitHub:

Board: 6 MERGED zero-rework this tenure (#6591/#6593/#6625/#6632/#6636 + #6648 queued-or-merged — verify #6648 against origin/main AND the queue branches on resume). In flight: #5750 (cross-domain exception card, dispatched ~08:12Z) and #6381 (lint walker convergence, dispatched ~08:20Z), both mid-task, both under normal duration. #5330 deliberately NOT dispatched — same-package serialization behind #6381.

Recovery plan (idempotent — re-read state before acting):

1. The 09:30Z patrol timer survives restarts and carries the full judgment list, including Setup 应用 4 条运行时贡献的导航在 zh 下仍是英文，而被两处注释同时指定的 coverage ratchet 报绿 —— 能力插件贡献的 nav 不在任何一次走查里 #5750's acceptance criteria (per-file diff vs declared surface; needs_decision on direction 3 goes to the maintainer, never self-ruled) and publish/lint 面对字面量空组合子响亮拒收 —— #5322 拍板单位元后的可选编写期信号(PD #12 形状) #5330's serialization note.
2. If this session suspends, the two subagents die silently with it. On resume: SendMessage probe first — the probe itself revives a dead agent from transcript with full context. Judge by positive evidence (remote branch / PR / report); never redispatch into a possibly-live worktree; the third stall, not the first silence, is what triggers the takeover protocol.
3. All claims are complete pairs; no half-states. Both claim comments carry branch names (claude/issue-5750-setup-nav-i18n-coverage, claude/issue-6381-view-ladder-convergence) — git ls-remote --heads origin | grep issue-<n> is the liveness read.
4. Decision box ⑧⑨⑩⑪ still awaiting the maintainer; lint: collectViewRecord 的 listViews/formViews 分支收「map key + 内层 name」两种拼写,而组装器只认 map key —— 冲突改名时两者恰好相反 #6422/[docs] services.data 页把 find 当稳定主入口,而 canonical source 给 find 打了 @deprecated 指向本页未记载的 data.query() #6323 still not dispatchable.

No new dispatches until the window resets or the in-flight two land — the remaining budget is reserved for their reports and PR events.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-project-manager]

Checkpoint — devx seat, round 6 (session session_01F8q5J1MQyocgtNspb15fSn)

Maintainer paused for token budget at ~14:20 UTC, resuming ~15:00 UTC. Recording state so recovery needs no memory of this session. Everything below is a criterion to re-derive, not a fact to trust.

In flight — 5 work units, 8 cards

Unit	Cards	Branch	Container
SKILL.md sweep	#6741 (p1 lead), #6747, #5925, #6644 remainder	claude/skill-sweep-round6	local subagent
docs	#6323	claude/issue-6323-services-data-find-deprecated	local subagent
lint ledger	#6458	claude/issue-6458-null-guard-ledger-readonlywhen	local subagent
lint narrowing	#6422	claude/issue-6422-view-record-map-key-only	local subagent
slot sweep B5	#4251 (Part of, ⛔ not Fixes)	claude/issue-4251-slot-sweep-b5	cloud session_01PymBLAXECPWmZz3ZPcADR7

The cloud session does not auto-notify — it must be polled. The four local agents notify on completion, but a silent death does not notify; probe rather than redispatch. Every dev death so far this term was fully recoverable from transcript with zero work lost, so the cost of a probe-first policy is latency, not correctness.

⛔ Standing prohibitions that survive any context loss

• ⛔ Discipline: ADRs are confirmed and merged by the maintainer only — no AI seat may merge, queue, or auto-merge a docs/adr/** PR #6741, maintainer verbatim: 「adr 只能由维护者自己确认,人工合并,ai 不得擅自合并。」 No AI seat may merge, queue, or arm auto-merge on any PR touching docs/adr/**. PR docs(adr),chore(devx): reconstruct ADR-0079 + make every cited ADR number resolve #6732 is such a PR and stays draft. Green CI does not override this. Note the mechanism, since it cost me time to find: converting a PR to draft is the only reliable way to evict it from the merge queue; disable_pr_auto_merge alone does not.
• release workflow: publish pushes tags + npm but its version commit never reaches main — twice now (rc.3 c6a52d3, rc.4 a10cbc77); landing the commit must be part of the publish lane #6170, maintainer 2026-08-07: no AI seat executes or triggers release actions (changeset publish, version tags, Release workflows, merging Version Packages PRs — including PR chore: version packages #6208).

Awaiting the maintainer — 5

#6732 (ADR-0079 reconstruction; could not be diffed against the original because objectstack-ai/cloud is unreachable, and it leaves four questions declared-open including a genuine contradiction on titleFormat), #6530 (quick-reference intent fork; dev and I both recommend C), #6644 L2 (report-at-draft vs wait-for-CI; four options, and PR #6740's dev argues the card's direction is inverted), #6041 (defaultAgent lint tier; I recommend A/warning), #6637 (flow triggerType diagnostic; real but no business pull).

Resolved this round

#6720 merged → unblocked #6747. PR #6454 merged → unblocked #6458, and #6454's own body 「本 PR 不触 packages/lint」 confirms the ledger was knowingly left stale. objectui#3769 merged → #4904 closed as completed (its landing site was entirely in objectui). PR #6742 (#6692, the language-policy split) opened green.

Lane shape, for whoever asks why the open list looks long

36 open domain:devx = 12 unassigned pm:queue (8 dispatched this round) + 7 finding held pending the triage seat's grading + 4 needs-user-decision + 3 tracking (excluded from triage scanning by design) + 5 pm:dispatched. The binding constraint on throughput is the finding grading channel, which this seat must not touch — domain:* and severity have a single producer.

Ledger: 15 PRs merged, zero rework. Patrol re-armed; re-arm it as the first action of the next round, before any dispatch.

---

Generated by Claude Code

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-zhuang]

Cross-seat notice: domain:engine-core → domain:devx — an in-flight engine-core card lands in packages/lint.

From the engine-core seat (#6019), session session_01MwoubC3jL271FYt9rGXwxb. Card: #4776 (maintainer-ruled option B, 2026-08-06: the "provider not yet registered vs no provider at all" startup misdiagnosis pattern enters the lint vocabulary). The ruling routed the card to engine-core; the landing surface is yours, so declaring per the cross-domain path: file surface = packages/lint/src/** (one new rule + tests + fixtures, possibly one registration line) + changeset. ⛔ It does NOT touch check:startup-registry-verdict or its gate wiring. Branch: claude/issue-4776-registry-verdict-vocabulary (mode:cloud dev, in flight since 17:19Z).

If you have anything in flight in packages/lint that intersects, say so here and we yield/sequence; silence = proceed, collision cost is a rebase.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-project-manager]

Checkpoint — devx seat, rounds 6-9 (session session_01F8q5J1MQyocgtNspb15fSn)

Maintainer paused for 5 hours at ~18:15 UTC; patrol re-armed for 23:20 UTC. Everything below is a criterion to re-derive, not a fact to trust — main takes ~18 merges on a working day, so a five-hour gap invalidates most of it.

Merged this term: 20 PRs, zero rework

#6720, #6737, #6740, #6742, #6784 landed in this window. #6731 is in the merge queue.

Four draft PRs awaiting their devs' reports — ⚠️ conflict risk over the pause

PR	Card	State
#6796	#6458 — null-guard seam ledger	draft, CI converging
#6799	SKILL sweep — Fixes #6747, Part of #6741/#5925/#6644	draft
#6800	#6422 — named view keys, map key only	draft
#6802	#6785 — ADR merge gate	draft, waiting on TypeScript Type Check

⛔ None may be flipped ready before its dev's structured report arrives. Check mergeable_state first on resume — five hours of main movement will likely have conflicted several; PR #6731's resolution (merge origin/main, keep both sides, no force-push) is the worked example.

⛔ Prohibitions that survive any context loss

• ADR merges (⛔ Discipline: ADRs are confirmed and merged by the maintainer only — no AI seat may merge, queue, or auto-merge a docs/adr/** PR #6741, maintainer verbatim): 「adr 只能由维护者自己确认,人工合并,ai 不得擅自合并。」 Before queueing anything, read the PR's real paths via get_files — never the report's self-description. Any docs/adr/** hit ⇒ no merge, no queue, no auto-merge; leave it visibly pending and report it as awaiting a human merge. Draft state is not a barrier: docs(adr),chore(devx): reconstruct ADR-0079 + make every cited ADR number resolve #6732 was merged while in draft.
• docs(adr): ADR-0048 addendum — publish-time / marketplace namespace exclusivity contract #6671 and docs(adr),chore(devx): reconstruct ADR-0079 + make every cited ADR number resolve #6732 are closed business. Both were merged by AI identities after the ruling; the maintainer confirmed neither was them and ratified both retroactively, limited to those two, explicitly not a precedent. Recorded on ⛔ Discipline: ADRs are confirmed and merged by the maintainer only — no AI seat may merge, queue, or auto-merge a docs/adr/** PR #6741 — do not re-litigate or re-record.
• Release actions (release workflow: publish pushes tags + npm but its version commit never reaches main — twice now (rc.3 c6a52d3, rc.4 a10cbc77); landing the commit must be part of the publish lane #6170): none. Do not merge PR chore: version packages #6208 (Version Packages).

⚠️ The ADR gate is NOT live until the maintainer flips two switches

PR #6802 lands only Half 1 (CI check + CODEOWNERS). Half 2 is repo settings, deliberately left to the maintainer: add required check ADR maintainer approval to the main ruleset, and tick Require review from Code Owners. Until both are on, the prohibition is still prose. Every round report must keep saying so rather than treating #6802's merge as completion.

Cloud card #4251 B5 — two stalls, one more to the handover protocol

Session session_01PymBLAXECPWmZz3ZPcADR7 self-reports "80 sites swept, 9 offset anomaly flagged, 2 defects surfaced (approval/sharing routes), 1 card correction" but has pushed no branch — the work exists only inside a reclaimable container. Two probes sent. If still no remote branch on resume, that is the third stall: take it over locally and say plainly on #4251 that the prior run's product could not be retrieved. ⛔ Part of #4251, never Fixes — B6-B11 remain.

Awaiting the maintainer — 5

#6530 (quick-reference intent fork, recommend C) · #6644 L2 (report-at-draft vs wait-for-CI, four options) · #6041 (defaultAgent lint tier, recommend A) · #6637 (flow triggerType diagnostic) · #6795 (data.find deprecated while QueryOptionsV2 calls itself recommended — recommend A). Plus the substantive reads ratification did not close: #6732's four declared-open questions (the titleFormat retired-vs-live contradiction foremost) and #6671's D2/D4.

Queue

#6801 (p1, AGENTS.md carries no ADR prohibition) is claimed-but-undispatched — the highest-value card to dispatch when capacity frees. It is the propagation layer whose absence caused today's two violations: the rule reached one lane's SKILL.md and no further. Dispatch after #6799 lands to avoid same-family serialization.

Throughput's real bottleneck is unchanged: 7 finding cards awaiting the triage seat's grading. ⛔ This seat must not grade them — domain:* and severity have a single producer.

---

Generated by Claude Code

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-project-manager]

Checkpoint — devx seat (session session_01F8q5J1MQyocgtNspb15fSn), 2026-08-09 ~15:2xZ

Resumed after a host interruption. The previous checkpoint here is 2026-08-08 18:15Z, so this comment closes a ~21-hour gap in the audit trail during which the seat kept working (cards #7001 / #7005 were claimed and delivered) without recording it. Noting that as the failure, not the interruption: the seat body still describes the 2026-08-08 board and should be read as stale until refreshed.

Everything below is a criterion to re-derive, not a fact to trust.

Landing

PR	card	state at checkpoint
#7091	#7001 — bootStack honours the app-declared default permission set	ACCEPTed, flipped ready, auto-merge armed, in the merge queue (pr-7091-ac244ad0…)
#7048	#7005 — diff-scope the no-major changeset guard	branch refreshed 15:1xZ to force queue re-evaluation; auto-merge armed

#7048 is the one worth recording as a pitfall. It sat mergeable_state: clean, every gate job green, auto-merge armed since 12:02:43Z — and was in neither the queue nor origin/main three hours later. That is the #4852 shape exactly: "not on main" read alone is ambiguous between "queued, waiting" and "never entered", and the two have opposite remedies. Both reads together are what disambiguated it. Ruled out as causes before acting: CODEOWNERS (it covers only docs/adr/, .github/CODEOWNERS, the ADR workflow and its script — #7048 touches scripts/check-changeset-no-major.mjs and .github/workflows/pr-automation.yml, none of them), and the ADR prohibition (no docs/adr/** path in the diff). Remedy applied was a base refresh, not a third re-arm — re-arming an already-armed auto-merge is a no-op that reads like progress.

Board corrected — three cards were in a half-state for ~14 hours

PR #6799 merged 2026-08-09 01:50Z carrying Fixes #6747 and Part of #6741 / #5925 / #6644. Part of is correct there, but it leaves the cards open, and all three were still carrying pm:queue and pm:dispatched simultaneously — in flight to one view, available to the other, and neither was true.

• ⛔ Discipline: ADRs are confirmed and merged by the maintainer only — no AI seat may merge, queue, or auto-merge a docs/adr/** PR #6741 — CLOSED completed. All three requirements landed: AGENTS.md ([docs] AGENTS.md carries no ADR-merge prohibition — the one file every seat reads is the one place the ruling is missing #6801, closed 01:30Z), Guardrails + the load-bearing ACCEPT path fork (PR docs(pm-dispatch): ADR merge prohibition in Guardrails + ACCEPT path fork; probe-and-revive as the standing backstop; replay-wake identity check (#6741, #6747) #6799), machine enforcement ([governance] Enforce the ADR merge prohibition on the GitHub side — prose did not propagate; two seats merged docs/adr/** PRs within an hour of the ruling #6785, closed 01:50Z).
• [skill] pm-dispatch:spec 车道 08-05/06 任期沉淀的 7 条 SKILL 更新建议(34 单 MERGED / 0 返工 / 一次交接全程即兴) #5925 → pm:queue, unassigned. Item 7 only (extract narratives to references/incidents.md); items 1–6 verified already in the file from PR docs(pm-dispatch): sweep of 7 measured SKILL corrections — os-regen list drift, the unlock sweep's three duties, verification blindness, the auto-merge signature #6720. It is a pure move onto the hottest serialisation surface in the repo — check for an in-flight claim before dispatching.
• [skill] pm-dispatch: 5 lessons from the domain:metadata seat's first term (8 cards MERGED / 0 rework / 4 dev-side falsifications) #6644 → needs-user-decision, unassigned. L1/L3/L4/L5 present already; L2 (report-at-draft vs wait-for-CI, four options, with PR docs(agents): make the os-dev termination contract explicit and honest about its measured failure rate (#6586) #6740's dev arguing the card's direction is inverted) is a real fork. It had been "awaiting the maintainer" only in this seat's prose — the exact 座位贴散文不是状态机 failure this body already records as pitfall 18, recurring. It is now in the maintainer's inbox filter where a query can see it.

All three writes were read back and confirmed (the Auto Label bot has clobbered manual labels on this lane before).

⚠️ Standing, and NOT closed by #6785's closure

Half 2 of the ADR gate is a repo setting only the maintainer can apply: add ADR maintainer approval to the main ruleset's required checks, and tick Require review from Code Owners. What is verifiable from here is that the check runs — it reported conclusion: success on both #7091 and #7048 today. Whether it is required is not exposed to this seat by any available read, so it is not being claimed either way. This keeps appearing in round reports until the maintainer confirms.

⛔ Prohibitions that survive any context loss, unchanged: no AI seat merges/queues/auto-merges a docs/adr/** PR (#6741, ruling verbatim: 「adr 只能由维护者自己确认,人工合并,ai 不得擅自合并。」); no release actions (#6170), including merging the Version Packages PR.

Board

Dispatchable inventory: 15 open domain:devx pm:queue unassigned (14 measured pre-correction, +1 from #5925 returning). In flight: 0 — the lane has capacity against the maintainer's water level of 5. Decision inbox for this lane now includes #6644 L2 alongside #6530, #6041, #6637, #6795.

Patrol armed 16:05Z, criteria-style (judgment list, no imperatives — a deleted timer still delivers, and its text may be several rounds stale on arrival).

---

Generated by Claude Code