Model-tier policy: the contract-review tier is reserved for the skills seat (three protocol files + the published skills/** catalogs), the spec seat's clause-② review, and the maintainer-summoned director; triage and every other seat run the default tier

Filed by the domain:skills execution seat (session session_01MoTv7pn338AZ71owsp19gQ, GitHub os-justin) at 2026-09-10T03:1xZ under the maintainer's direct instruction in this seat's chat session — 直派通道: routed and claimed by the instructed PM session, labels set by that seat under the direct-dispatch rule, ⛔ not a triage grading.

裁决 — the maintainer's words, verbatim and untranslated (chat, 2026-09-10, 02:0xZ–03:0xZ)

「现在所有车道都会派 fable 任务，没有fable就等契约复审，你综合评估一下，我们哪些车道实际需要fable级别的开发的。哪些只用opus就够了」
「必须 fable的还包括对外发布的skills」
「按照你的新建议，只有 spec 和 skills 车道需要fable 对吧。」— the seat answered 对 with the split in the table below (spec: default-tier build, contract-review-tier review of clause ②; skills: contract-review-tier build and review), and the maintainer built the next two rulings on that answer.
「分诊席现在也是opus，裁决统一由我以总监的身份召唤。比如我在 hotcrm 或其他元数据项目中可以召唤总监裁决。」
「现有的卡片如果写了要求fable的，也要让相关的项目经理知道，opus就够了。」
「裁决（决策箱、代裁、一类自裁）是人工召唤，不需要fable，简单的元数据项目opus就可以，这个我人工判断。」— added 2026-09-10T03:16Z, while the dev was already in flight; the dev was messaged the same minute and this body amended (table row, adjudication paragraph, file surface).

The default model tier is on the manual floor (人工地板: 花费/配额/舰队形态/默认模型档位). These sentences are the maintainer's explicit words for it. ⛔ This card re-adjudicates none of them; the seat's own prose below uses the tier names the skill text already uses (契约复审档 = CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER, 默认判断档 = TIER_DEFAULT), and ⛔ no model name enters any skill file (the director charter already forbids it).

What the rule text says after this card

seat / channel	build	review	contract-review tier used
triage seat, incl. its emergency-triage subagent	—	—	never
engine / services / cli / devx / ui / hotcrm execution seats	default tier	the lane seat's own default-tier review + the gates	never
spec seat	default tier	clause-② PRs: contract-review-tier review (in-seat subagent; fuse unchanged)	review only
skills seat	contract-review tier for the clause-① files AND the published `skills/` catalogs; default tier for `references/` and other governed one-liners as today	skills-seat self-review at the contract-review tier	build + review
adjudication: decision inbox, 代裁, 一类自裁	—	—	the maintainer-summoned director seat, and only it — at whatever tier the maintainer summons it (人工判断; the default tier is fine for a simple metadata project). ⛔ No tier hard gate on the director (ruling 6)

Clause ① (path mandate) = .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md, .claude/agents/os-dev.md, skills/objectstack-pm-dispatch/SKILL.md (unchanged) plus the published skills/** catalogs: objectstack skills/ (11 skill trees, 46 files, ~13.6k lines; shipped by npm create objectstack and npx skills add objectstack-ai/objectstack/skills --skill '*', per skills/README.md:5–:9) and objectui skills/objectui/ (27 files, 5,189 lines; npx skills add objectstack-ai/objectui, per objectui README.md:521). ⛔ No one-line exemption for skills/**: a closed enumeration beats a per-line "is this mechanical" call, and the maintainer's word is 必须.

Clause ② (content rule) is unchanged in substance — the Clause-② declaration, the widening-tells gate, pin tests, and the manual floor for widenings under 代裁 all stay. What changes is WHO reviews: only the spec seat's clause-② review runs at the contract-review tier. Anything touching packages/spec already routes to the spec seat (〈多仓协调〉 rule 5), so no other lane keeps a contract-review-tier dependency.

Adjudication: the only adjudicator is the director seat summoned by the maintainer, and its tier is the maintainer's per-summon choice (ruling 6) — the director records the tier it ran at (harness reading) in its session audit line, and ⛔ never refuses or parks its duties for being below the contract-review tier. So: 置信门 drops gate ⑤ (档位硬门) and becomes four gates; the 「档位未达 ⇒ 整体跳过」 consequence and the director's 「不达档只做免档整理并停放四职」 state are deleted, not moved; the 降档保险丝 no longer applies to the director (its population is the spec seat's clause-② review and the skills seat). The triage seat spawns no contract-review-tier subagent — for 代裁 or anything else — and the per-fire 代裁 pass leaves the triage duties; the director's remaining gates (一类自裁门's three criteria, the four-gate 置信门, the manual floor) are where 代裁 lives.

File surface and the exact lines (`origin/main` `d64bcb63`, 2026-09-10T03:01Z)

.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md — 812 lines, ratchet ceiling 812, headroom 0 ⇒ net-zero or fewer lines; every line added is paid for by a line merged or deleted.
- :75 「分诊席跑普通直连会话、默认判断档;达档职责改派显式传 model 的契约复审档子代理。」 → the second clause goes; the triage seat has no 达档职责.
- :310–:311 「代裁只由达档者产出,⛔ 永不凭自述。」/「达档者 = 显式传 model 的契约复审档子代理(逐份过转录核验),或达档总监席。」 → 达档者 = the maintainer-summoned director seat, only.
- :332 「紧急卡直接分诊:维护者点名或 p0 嫌疑 ⇒ 立即起契约复审档分诊子代理,不等定时轮。」 → default tier. The seat reads 「分诊席现在也是opus」 as covering the whole seat including its subagents; the reading is recorded here so the maintainer can veto it on the PR.
- :398–:399 置信门⑤「档位硬门达标」 and 「档位未达 ⇒ 本 fire 代裁整体跳过,卡原样留在决策箱走维护者路径。」 → deleted outright (ruling 6: no tier gate on adjudication); 置信门 is four gates wherever the text counts them; the triage seat's per-fire 代裁 pass is deleted.
- :507–:526 model-tier rows: :509 (clause-① surface) adds the published skills/**; :510 (the exemption) says skills/** is not exempt; :513 scopes the clause-② contract-review-tier review to the spec seat; :523 「契约复审档留给裁决/复审子代理、skills 席与条款②复核。」 → 「契约复审档留给总监席、skills 席与 spec 席的条款②复核」; :522 stays true as written.
- :767–:770 director entry: :769 「总监席档位硬门 = CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER,不达档只做免档整理并停放四职。」 → 「总监席档位由维护者按项目人工定,每场记入摘要台账;⛔ 无档位硬门、无免档整理态。」; plus the statement that the director is the only adjudicator.
.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/core-rules.md (151/151): the twins at :18, :94 (代裁 producer = the summoned director, no tier gate, no 「不达档则通道整体跳过」), :98 (four gates, 达档 dropped), :112 and :147 change in the same PR (「一条规则在本文与核心条款一处改动,另一处同 PR 同改」).
.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/contract-review.md (60/60): :10–:18 keep their shape but name the spec seat as the reviewing seat; :29/:34 the review-subagent language is the spec seat's; :48–:60 the fuse stays for the two seats that still produce at-tier verdicts (the spec seat's clause-② review and the skills seat) and says that other seats' reviews — and the director's adjudications — are not at-tier verdicts and are not gated by it.
.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/director.md (72 lines): :12–:14 (「档位 = CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER」, the per-summon fuse reading, 「不达档只做免档整理…⛔ 不裁不清标」) → the tier is the maintainer's per-summon choice, recorded from the harness reading in the session audit line, never a refusal; plus one clause — the director is the only adjudicator and is summoned in whichever repo the maintainer is working in. ⛔ The published-skill director role (summonable inside hotcrm or a customer metadata project) is NOT this card: it is a feature of the published skill, on the manual floor, and waits on the maintainer's inbox-location answer — a separate card.
scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs: MANDATORY_TIER_GLOBS (:10603) gains a skills/** entry whose why names the 2026-09-10 ruling; the docblock at :10512–:10526 is corrected to the new clause-① set; self-test cases so that --tier skills/objectstack-data/SKILL.md prints the mandate and --tier .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/core-rules.md still does not. objectui has no dispatch-gates.mjs: its skills/objectui/** is covered by the rule text and the skills seat's claim/review discipline — ⛔ no objectui PR.
⛔ Not touched: .claude/agents/os-dev.md (its floor comment at :12 stays true); skills/objectstack-pm-dispatch/SKILL.md (the frame-sync COPIES carry no tier text — measured: zero hits for tier / contract-review / model in the file); references/lanes/triage.md (7 lines, no tier line); references/lanes/spec.md (:25 points at SKILL.md as the single source and stays a pointer).

Acceptance

node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --tier skills/objectstack-data/SKILL.md and --tier skills/objectstack-ai/SKILL.md print the clause-① mandate; --tier .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/core-rules.md prints none; --self-test is green with the new cases.
SKILL.md carries the table above inside its existing rows (⛔ no new section), stays ≤ 812 lines, and pnpm -s check:skill-line-ratchet, check:skill-frame-sync, check:pm-skill-id-lint (⛔ no issue numbers in skill files) and check:skill-compatibility are green.
The core-rules.md twins move in the same PR; contract-review.md and director.md stay within their ceilings.
Every deleted or moved line is quoted before/after in the PR body, next to the ruling sentence it implements.
PR body: first line Fixes #<this card>; ## 维护者速读(草稿) (Chinese, five sections, business angle); ## Acceptance notes. Governed (.claude/** + scripts/pm/**) ⇒ draft, ⛔ never ready / enqueued / auto-merged / approved by any seat; skip-changeset applies (neither path ships in a package).

Out of scope — separate acts

Director role in the published skills/objectstack-pm-dispatch, the hotcrm install, and where hotcrm's decision cards live (本仓 vs objectstack): waits on the maintainer's answer; a separate card.
Telling the seats whose existing cards carry a contract-review-tier requirement that the default tier suffices (ruling 5): done by this seat as a comment on each such card, citing this card; ⛔ not part of the PR.

Generated by Claude Code

Claim: skills seat, session session_01MoTv7pn338AZ71owsp19gQ (GitHub os-justin), 2026-09-10T03:07Z — direct dispatch under the maintainer's chat instruction quoted verbatim in the body (直派通道).

Session: session_01MoTv7pn338AZ71owsp19gQ
Branch: claude/issue-17285-tier-policy
Worktree: /home/user/objectstack-issue-17285, cut from origin/main d64bcb63 (03:01Z)
Domain: domain:skills — governed surface (.claude/** + scripts/pm/**)
File surface (region-declared): .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md :75, :310–:311, :332, :398–:399, :507–:526, :767–:770; references/core-rules.md :18, :94, :98, :112, :147; references/contract-review.md :10–:18, :29, :34, :48–:60; references/lanes/director.md one line; scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs MANDATORY_TIER_GLOBS + its docblock + self-test cases. Nothing else.
Container & model: L (protocol semantics across five files that all sit at their ratchet ceilings), mode:subagent, build tier = CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER (clause ①: the SKILL.md main file is on MANDATORY_TIER_GLOBS; passed explicitly as the dispatch's model parameter), review = skills-seat self-review at the same tier.
Clause-②: no — the card narrows and re-scopes who produces at-tier verdicts; no accept set and no public surface widens.
Thread-read: card body; 0 comments at claim time (new card).
Serial constraints: no open PR touches any file on this surface (23 open PRs' file lists read 03:0xZ); docs(skills): cite the platform-tool registry instead of restating it #17259 (this seat's other open PR) is on skills/objectstack-ai/SKILL.md, disjoint. H17 intersection: dispatch-gates: STAGE-THEN-RUN reaches a program by an edge neither follow traverses — check:objectui-changeset inherits nothing from scripts/bump-objectui.sh #14290 (pm:on-hold, devx) carries Restart-touch: scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs — its restart precondition ([finding] extractWatchHints masks // but not # comments, so a shell target's inherited population is prose — latent until the first family follows a .sh #16132 closed) is the devx seat's to re-check on that card; ⛔ not folded here; its former riders [finding] dispatch-gates residue: after #12514 the extensionless-target reason is only reachable for a BARE hint, where it names the wrong cause — latent wrong-reason row, zero instances today #12797 / [finding] check-cross-package-test-inputs' docblock states the single-segment hint refusal without its one exception #12808 are closed (delivered on PR fix(devx): an artifact-roster row either judges the diff or says plainly that it cannot #16221). Verify-lock depth 0 at 03:01Z.
Premise checks: action face git log -6 per file read 03:01Z (newest touches: SKILL.md d03c3c96, dispatch-gates 6aa1d090, contract-review 02643646, core-rules 8efe2753, director 7337179d); card-reference face: dispatch-gates: STAGE-THEN-RUN reaches a program by an edge neither follow traverses — check:objectui-changeset inherits nothing from scripts/bump-objectui.sh #14290 open on-hold, [finding] dispatch-gates residue: after #12514 the extensionless-target reason is only reachable for a BARE hint, where it names the wrong cause — latent wrong-reason row, zero instances today #12797/[finding] check-cross-package-test-inputs' docblock states the single-segment hint refusal without its one exception #12808 closed (read 03:0xZ); work-item face: every line the body cites was read on d64bcb63 at 03:01Z.

Generated by Claude Code

Dispatched — R8, 2026-09-10T03:11Z, mode:subagent, build tier CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER passed explicitly (clause ①). Claim 5612043249 is the dev's identity; branch claude/issue-17285-tier-policy. Governed terminal: draft + four-piece, skills-seat self-review at the same tier.

Generated by Claude Code

Ruling 5 executed — notices posted 2026-09-10T03:15Z (skills seat). Census method: every open issue and PR in objectstack (636), objectui (484) and hotcrm (75) had its body read, and every open PR or pm:*-labelled card its full comment thread, for Clause-②: yes, contract-review-tier / at-tier / 契约复审档 wording and Size/model suggestion: lines (started 03:00Z, finished 03:07Z). Population = open cards and PRs OUTSIDE the spec and skills lanes carrying such a requirement; spec-lane items keep their tier review and got none; bare (unlabelled) cards are triage's and got none.

repo	cards	PRs	knock on seat posts
objectstack	35 (engine 8 · services 11 · cli 9 · devx 7)	5 (#16950 #17206 #17223 #17252 #17261 — none touches `packages/spec`)	#6367 #6021 #6024 #6023 #6017 #6015 #12708
objectui	37 (ui 35 · devx 2; four of them quota-holds whose `Restart-when:` tier half is discharged)	13 (cards in `domain:ui`)	#5560 #5748 #5734
hotcrm	0	0	#1353

Two cards carry a caveat because their open PR touches packages/spec (#16344 → PR #17195, #16549 → PR #17256): the spec seat's tier review still applies to those PRs as they stand. Every notice quotes the ruling verbatim, cites this card, and changes no label, assignee or claim. 90 comments, 0 errors.

Generated by Claude Code

Ruling 6 added 2026-09-10T03:16Z (maintainer, chat, verbatim): 「裁决（决策箱、代裁、一类自裁）是人工召唤，不需要fable，简单的元数据项目opus就可以，这个我人工判断。」 Body amended in place (ruling list, the adjudication table row and paragraph, the :398–:399 / :769 / director.md / contract-review.md / core-rules.md bullets): the director has NO tier hard gate — its tier is the maintainer's per-summon choice, recorded from the harness reading in the session audit line; 置信门 drops gate ⑤ and is four gates; the 降档保险丝 population is the spec seat's clause-② review and the skills seat only. The in-flight dev (claim 5612043249) was messaged the same minute; the branch is expected to carry the amended shape.

Generated by Claude Code

os-dev-report

{
  "issue": 17285,
  "status": "done",
  "branch": "claude/issue-17285-tier-policy",
  "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/17294",
  "premise_still_valid": true,
  "summary": "Rule text now reserves the contract-review tier for the skills seat (three clause-① files plus the published skills/** catalogs, build and review) and the spec seat’s clause-② review; the triage seat (its emergency-triage subagent included — seat reading recorded in the PR body for veto) and every other execution seat run the default tier and spawn no contract-review-tier subagent; adjudication (decision inbox, 代裁, 一类自裁) is the maintainer-summoned director alone at the tier the maintainer chooses per summon — no hard gate, no 免档整理 state, 置信门 four gates (ruling 6, received 03:16Z as an in-flight amendment and verified on the card, folded in before the first push). dispatch-gates.mjs: MANDATORY_TIER_GLOBS gains skills/** with oneLineExit:false (the ruling’s 必须 closes the one-line exit by path), docblock corrected, tier rendering refuses the one-line exit on a skills/** hit and states the spec-seat-only clause-② review, 15 self-test cases added. Draft PR only (governed .claude/** + scripts/pm/**); no changeset — neither path ships in any package files[], PM applies skip-changeset. Assignee was already set by the PM; identity = claim 5612043249. PR body read back: content byte-identical to what was sent up to and including my session-URL footer (32846 B); the platform appended one more block (blank line, rule line, the same session-URL footer — the measured create-time behaviour), so the stored body carries two footers; per the standing rule it is not re-sent, and durable attribution sits in the body prose (Session: line).",
  "tests": "All on worktree /home/user/objectstack-issue-17285 at ec15afa1 (base ebf9a489 = origin/main at cut; main later advanced to a256f189 on a disjoint file). --tier acceptance (exit 0 each): skills/objectstack-data/SKILL.md and skills/objectstack-ai/SKILL.md → 「Model tier — MANDATORY: … ⇢ ’skills/**’ … the one-line-class mechanical-edit downgrade is ⛔ NOT available for this surface」; .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/core-rules.md → 「no path-derived mandate: the surface hits none of the 4 declared glob(s)」; skills/objectstack-pm-dispatch/SKILL.md → two hits, one tier, no ambiguity refusal. node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --self-test (detached, outlived the 600 s cap — assumption E true): 「✓ dispatch-gates self-test: 1639 cases pass.」 exit 0, all 15 new cases found as ✓ by name. pnpm check:pm-dispatch-gates detached per its header, waited with tail --pid (03:47Z→04:00Z): log ends with the same pass line, no wrapper failure print; detached exit code not captured. Gate list derived with dispatch-gates --commands from the merge-base change set (39 commands, identical to the pre-edit five-path derivation) and every family run: check:pm-skill-ratchet 「✓ check-skill-line-ratchet: declared cross-file moves: 1, total ceilings down 9 lines.」; check:skill-frame-sync 「binding sentence present in all 2; 4 count mention(s) agree; 76 markdown files scanned」; check:skill-compatibility 「11 SKILL.md file(s) reconciled against 80 workspace packages」; check:pm-skill-id-lint 「27 file(s) clean」; check:nul-bytes 「OK … no raw ASCII control bytes」; check:pm-governed-prose 「2 instruction surface(s) name all 5 registered governed surfaces」; check:declared-population-live, check:watch-hint-literal, check:entry-guard, check:parse-guard, check:ratchet-remedy-authority, check:comment-mask-corpus 「6466 files, 0 disagree」 and the remaining node/pnpm families all exit 0 (verdict lines quoted in the PR body). check:doc-formula-expressions: first run exit 3 PREREQUISITE NOT MET; after building @objectstack/formula + @objectstack/lint under scripts/pm/os-verify-lock.sh (「VERDICT command-exit 0 · held the lock 191s · waited 0s」) exit 0 「✓ check:doc-formula-expressions: 22 record-scoped formula example(s) across 440 files / 1374 TS blocks judged clean」. check-governed-merges.mjs --test over the five files: exit 3 「⛔ GOVERNED — a human merge is the review record for this PR」 (.claude/** ×4). dispatch-gates --ran reconciliation: 「✓ dispatch-gates --ran: 39 derived famil(ies) accounted for — 39 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED.」 exit 0. Not run: repo-wide pnpm lint / pnpm test (CI’s; no package source touched, no build closure or package tests owed). Ablation: none owed — no runtime code path; the self-test’s existing mutation cases cover the tier table (dead-glob and ambiguity refusals) and the new cases pin both rendering directions.",
  "mcp_calls": "0 — every GitHub read and write went through repo-scoped REST (probe GET comments → 200 at 03:2xZ; POST pulls → 201) and git; no MCP GitHub tool was invoked",
  "open_questions": [],
  "out_of_scope_findings": [
    "noted, not filed (no defect class; 承接者: the skills seat’s next charter pass on references/lanes/): references/lanes/skills.md:20 「pm-dispatch 根恒契约复审档」 and references/lanes/cli.md:18 stay true but do not mention the skills/** widening — both defer to --tier, which now carries it"
  ],
  "gates": {
    "check:pm-skill-ratchet": "green — ✓ check-skill-line-ratchet: declared cross-file moves: 1, total ceilings down 9 lines.",
    "check:skill-frame-sync": "green — binding sentence present in all 2; 4 count mention(s) agree; 76 markdown files scanned",
    "check:skill-compatibility": "green — 11 SKILL.md file(s) reconciled against 80 workspace packages",
    "check:pm-skill-id-lint": "green — 27 file(s) clean (pattern /#[0-9]{3,}/g)",
    "check:nul-bytes": "green — no raw ASCII control bytes",
    "dispatch-gates --self-test": "green — ✓ dispatch-gates self-test: 1639 cases pass. (15 new)",
    "check:pm-dispatch-gates": "green by log — same pass line, no wrapper failure print; detached exit code not captured",
    "check-governed-merges --test": "exit 3 GOVERNED (.claude/** ×4)",
    "check:doc-formula-expressions": "green after prerequisite build — 22 record-scoped formula example(s) … judged clean",
    "dispatch-gates --ran": "green — 39 derived famil(ies) accounted for — 39 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED",
    "other derived families (29 pnpm/node commands)": "all exit 0, verdict lines in the PR body",
    "not run": "repo-wide pnpm lint / pnpm test (CI); 2 CI-measured-only families; Test Core job steps"
  },
  "line_budget": {
    ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md": "812/812 → 812/812 (−2: :311, :399 deleted; +2: skills/** no-exemption row after :510, 唯一裁决者 row after :769)",
    ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/core-rules.md": "151/151 → 151/151 (5 rows in place)",
    ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/contract-review.md": "60/60 → 60/60 (−1: :19 merged into :20; +1: fuse-population row after :50)",
    ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/director.md": "72/72 → 72/72 (5 rows in place)",
    "ceilings": "none raised, none lowered; every rewritten line ≤120 bytes (max 119 B)",
    "decision frame :735–:753": "md5 22f2339f0acb64cdb50c7adc9db681c3 unchanged"
  },
  "deviations": [
    "ruling-6 amendment (03:16Z, card comment 5612109163) applied over the original dispatch: :398–:399 deleted outright, :769 = maintainer’s per-summon tier with no hard gate, director.md :12–:14 rewritten, fuse population = spec clause-② review + skills seat, core-rules :94/:98 accordingly, 达档者 → 裁决者/总监席 where no tier is spoken of",
    "lines beyond the card’s declared regions, each forced by the twin rule (SKILL.md :44) or the ruling table: SKILL.md :639 and :642; contract-review.md :19–:20 (merge) and :42; director.md :47 and :72",
    "dispatch-gates.mjs tierLines edited beyond the exits line: the two clause-② sentences (they restated the superseded review scope in every claim comment); oneLineExit flag added as data on the skills/** entry",
    "no ruling date in any skill .md (corpus convention: rules carry no dates; the 2026-09-10 date lives in the dispatch-gates docblock/why and the PR body)",
    "gate spellings in the dispatch corrected: check:skill-line-ratchet → check:pm-skill-ratchet; check:doc-links / check:control-bytes / check:doc-fence-languages do not exist (derived list run instead; control bytes = check:nul-bytes); check-governed-queue-guard.mjs has no --test mode (reads GITHUB_EVENT_PATH, exit 1) — the predicate is check-governed-merges.mjs --test",
    "self-test count in the first body draft said 20; corrected to the 15 cases actually added before the PR was created"
  ],
  "files_changed": [
    ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md",
    ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/core-rules.md",
    ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/contract-review.md",
    ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/director.md",
    "scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs"
  ]
}

Generated by Claude Code

ACCEPT — PR #17294 (head ec15afa1) reviewed in-seat at the contract-review tier (skills seat, session session_01MoTv7pn338AZ71owsp19gQ, 2026-09-10T04:25Z).

Implemented-by: os-dev subagent on branch claude/issue-17285-tier-policy (claim 5612043249; build tier CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER passed explicitly; mode:subagent).
Reviewed-by: the skills seat, this session — independence pair holds (reviewer ≠ implementer); the seat's harness reading is the tier evidence per references/contract-review.md.
Diff vs card (six rulings, ruling 6 included): every changed line was read in the diff and maps to a ruling — SKILL.md :75, :310 (two rows merged), :332, :397–:398 (置信门四条), :509 + the new :511 (skills/** in clause ①, no one-line exemption), :513, :523, :638, :641, :767 / :769 / :770; core-rules :18 / :94 / :98 / :112 / :123; contract-review :10 / :12 / :13 / :15 / :19–:20 / :29 / :34 / :42 / :49–:50; director :12–:14 / :47 / :72; dispatch-gates: the skills/** entry with oneLineExit: false, the docblock, deriveTier / tierLines, and 15 self-test cases (each found by name in the log). The six lines beyond the declared regions are forced by the twin rule (SKILL.md :44) — accepted. No 「达档者」, no 「五条」 for 置信门, no model name and no issue number in any skill file.
Verified in the review worktree /home/user/objectstack-review-17294 at ec15afa1: line counts 812 / 151 / 60 / 72 (each at its ceiling, headroom 0, none raised); decision-frame block :734–:752 md5 22f2339f0acb64cdb50c7adc9db681c3 unchanged; --tier prints the mandate AND refuses the one-line exit for skills/objectstack-data/SKILL.md and skills/objectstack-ai/SKILL.md, two hits at one tier for skills/objectstack-pm-dispatch/SKILL.md, no mandate for references/core-rules.md, the clause-② line now names the spec seat; pnpm -s check:pm-skill-ratchet exit 0, check:skill-frame-sync exit 0, check:skill-compatibility exit 0, check:pm-skill-id-lint 「27 file(s) clean」; check-governed-merges.mjs --test exit 3 GOVERNED (.claude/** ×4). dispatch-gates.mjs --self-test re-run by this seat in a worktree with a real node_modules: 「✓ dispatch-gates self-test: 1639 cases pass.」 exit 0 (a first attempt in the symlinked-node_modules review worktree crashed on an unrelated ignore-rule fixture — git check-ignore … beyond a symbolic link — environment, not this PR).
CI on ec15afa1 at 04:24Z: every check success or skipped; Check Changeset's newest run (04:07Z, after skip-changeset was applied by this seat) is skipped.
Terminal: governed (.claude/** + scripts/pm/**) ⇒ the PR stays draft; needs-user-decision placed on the PR, 速读终稿 posted there, reviews requested from os-zhuang and hotlong; ⛔ not flipped ready, not enqueued, no auto-merge, no approval from this seat.
Tracked outside this PR: A metadata project's cards live in that project's repo — hotcrm's decision cards included; only platform problems are filed on objectstack/objectui: fix the three SKILL.md rows and the core-rules twins that send them to the objectstack inbox #17288 (the inbox-location rows, serial after this merges); deletion of the published skills/objectstack-pm-dispatch (the maintainer's word pending).

Generated by Claude Code

Landed — PR #17294 merged by os-zhuang at 2026-09-10T05:05:11Z (merge commit c47edbb21728, head ec15afa1), governed path (.claude/** + scripts/pm/**): draft → approving review by os-zhuang 04:41Z → human merge; this seat's ACCEPT verdict 5613072104 bound to that head. Verified on origin/main 8c9bd8f51fe5 at 2026-09-10T05:41Z: SKILL.md :509 names skills/** in the clause-① surface, :769 carries 「总监席档位由维护者按项目人工定」, and dispatch-gates.mjs MANDATORY_TIER_GLOBS carries the skills/** entry. Residue cleared in this same act: pm:dispatched off, assignee off; domain:skills and the type stay. Unblocked by this landing: #17288 (SKILL.md rows) and the published-skill deletion card (dispatch-gates.mjs), both dispatched now. Skills seat, session session_01MoTv7pn338AZ71owsp19gQ.

Generated by Claude Code

Navigation Menu

Repository navigation

Model-tier policy: the contract-review tier is reserved for the skills seat (three protocol files + the published skills/** catalogs), the spec seat's clause-② review, and the maintainer-summoned director; triage and every other seat run the default tier #17285

裁决 — the maintainer's words, verbatim and untranslated (chat, 2026-09-10, 02:0xZ–03:0xZ)

What the rule text says after this card

File surface and the exact lines (`origin/main` `d64bcb63`, 2026-09-10T03:01Z)

Acceptance

Out of scope — separate acts

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

Model-tier policy: the contract-review tier is reserved for the skills seat (three protocol files + the published skills/** catalogs), the spec seat's clause-② review, and the maintainer-summoned director; triage and every other seat run the default tier #17285

Description

裁决 — the maintainer's words, verbatim and untranslated (chat, 2026-09-10, 02:0xZ–03:0xZ)

What the rule text says after this card

File surface and the exact lines (origin/main d64bcb63, 2026-09-10T03:01Z)

Acceptance

Out of scope — separate acts

Activity

os-justin commented on Sep 10, 2026

os-justin commented on Sep 10, 2026

os-justin commented on Sep 10, 2026

os-justin commented on Sep 10, 2026

os-justin commented on Sep 10, 2026

os-justin commented on Sep 10, 2026

os-justin commented on Sep 10, 2026

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

Issue actions

File surface and the exact lines (`origin/main` `d64bcb63`, 2026-09-10T03:01Z)