Skip to content

feat!: drop npm-shrinkwrap.json support#9262

Merged
owlstronaut merged 1 commit intolatestfrom
owlstronaut/remove-shrinkwrap
Apr 21, 2026
Merged

feat!: drop npm-shrinkwrap.json support#9262
owlstronaut merged 1 commit intolatestfrom
owlstronaut/remove-shrinkwrap

Conversation

@owlstronaut
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

BREAKING CHANGE: npm shrinkwrap is removed, the shrinkwrap config alias is removed, and npm-shrinkwrap.json is no longer loaded or honored at the project root or from inside dependency tarballs. Rename project-root npm-shrinkwrap.json to package-lock.json; use bundleDependencies if you need to ship a locked dependency tree.

@owlstronaut owlstronaut force-pushed the owlstronaut/remove-shrinkwrap branch 6 times, most recently from 8c5ef3d to 5368f7e Compare April 20, 2026 21:07
@@ -1,809 +0,0 @@
/* IMPORTANT
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This apparently was a duplicate snapshot

@owlstronaut owlstronaut force-pushed the owlstronaut/remove-shrinkwrap branch from 5368f7e to bf539a5 Compare April 20, 2026 21:40
BREAKING CHANGE: `npm shrinkwrap` is removed, the `shrinkwrap` config alias is removed, and `npm-shrinkwrap.json` is no longer loaded or honored at the project root or from inside dependency tarballs. Rename project-root `npm-shrinkwrap.json` to `package-lock.json`; use `bundleDependencies` if you need to ship a locked dependency tree.
@owlstronaut owlstronaut force-pushed the owlstronaut/remove-shrinkwrap branch from bf539a5 to 4e418fc Compare April 20, 2026 21:56
@owlstronaut owlstronaut marked this pull request as ready for review April 20, 2026 22:15
@owlstronaut owlstronaut requested a review from a team as a code owner April 20, 2026 22:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants