Enhance SIEM integration template descriptions#1228
Conversation
Updated SIEM integration templates with detailed descriptions
Auto-Fix Summary0 issues fixed, 3 skipped across 1 files
| Ask |
|
@claude fix all issues |
|
Fix complete:
Summary — applied all four editorial suggestions from the review:
Note on the Auto-Fix Summary items: The 3 skipped Dale/Vale items (two passive-voice, one undefined-acronym) were intentionally left as-is. They describe UI state/properties rather than actions, and SIEM is a well-known security-industry acronym excluded by the rule — so no changes were needed there. |
|
Fix complete:
Summary — all four editorial suggestions from the review were applied:
|
- Align template sub-bullets to 4-space indentation to match the Type sub-list - Clarify Raw CEF prefix handling (date and host header, not 'framing') - Replace 'customer-specific' with 'custom' for consistency - State the positive use case for the Notification template Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Documentation PR ReviewEditorial Reviewdocs/threatmanager/3.2/administration/configuration/integrations/siem.md This change rewrites the Template dropdown list, expanding it from three entries to seven and adding a clear one-line description of each format. Overall the new content is a strong improvement: the CEF and LEEF acronyms are expanded on first use, the templates are grouped logically (CEF variants → LEEF → Custom → Notification), and the
Summary3 editorial suggestions across 1 file (2 minor clarity/completeness, 1 render check). The rewrite is a clear net improvement over the previous three-entry list. Vale and Dale issues are auto-fixed separately. What to do next: Comment
You can ask Claude anything about the review or about Netwrix writing standards.
|
Auto-Fix Summary0 issues fixed, 2 skipped across 1 files
| Ask |
Updated SIEM integration templates with detailed descriptions