Add documentation for NetworkEgress - #861
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 16 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe Kubernetes routing peer documentation now includes NetworkEgress guidance, covering target configuration, destination port rewriting, service discovery, a YAML example, and expected HTTP behavior. ChangesKubernetes egress documentation
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes Suggested reviewers: Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@src/pages/use-cases/kubernetes/routing-peer.mdx`:
- Around line 90-92: Correct the spelling and grammar in the network egress
documentation paragraph: change “a IP” to “an IP,” “rotuer” to “router,” “a
accompanying” to “an accompanying,” and “he target” to “the target.”
- Around line 90-92: Replace every occurrence of the internal-looking
prod.company.internal hostname in the routing-peer MDX example, including the
referenced lines, with the fictional placeholder example.com. Keep the hostname
usage and example behavior unchanged.
- Around line 92-112: Update the NetworkEgress example metadata.name from nginx
to a distinct name such as nginx-egress, avoiding conflict with the existing
Service/nginx; also update the subsequent HTTP request hostname to use the
generated egress Service name while preserving the namespace and cluster-local
format.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: d9034298-abb5-49cb-889d-5a9de7fbda97
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/pages/use-cases/kubernetes/routing-peer.mdx
Co-authored-by: dmitri-netbird <dmitri.external@netbird.io>
|
@SunsetDrifter is attempting to deploy a commit to the NetBird GmbH Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
Co-authored-by: dmitri-netbird <dmitri.external@netbird.io>
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
Clarified the explanation of network egress traffic and its configuration in Kubernetes.
This documents the basics for using the new egress feature implemented in the operator.
netbirdio/kubernetes-operator#357
Need help on this PR? Tag
/codesmithwith what you need. Autofix is disabled.Summary by CodeRabbit
NetworkEgressresources.