Fill and review API documentation - #209
Open
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Contributor
PoliCheck Scan ReportThe following report lists PoliCheck issues in PR files. Before you merge the PR, you must fix all severity-1 and severity-2 issues. The AI Review Details column lists suggestions for either removing or replacing the terms. If you find a false positive result, mention it in a PR comment and include this text: #policheck-false-positive. This feedback helps reduce false positives in future scans. ✅ No issues foundMore information about PoliCheckInformation: PoliCheck | Severity Guidance | Term |
Contributor
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Filled
To be added.documentation placeholders for the newly-shipped Graphite GPU backend APIs and the new async read-pixels members, then reviewed the existing docs for factual accuracy against the C# source.SKGraphiteContext,SKGraphiteRecorder,SKGraphiteRecording,SKGraphiteBackendTexture,SKGraphiteTextureInfo,SKGraphiteImageCache, backend contexts (Vk/Mtl/Dawn) and their init structs, options/submit/insert-recording/Vk-texture info structs, theSKGraphiteBackendandSKGraphiteInsertStatusenums, and the three Graphite delegates.SKImageReadPixelsResult,SKImageRescaleGamma,SKImageRescaleMode, plus newSKImage/SKSurface/SKGraphiteContextRequestReadPixels/FromTexture/ToTextureImage/Createoverloads.GRContext.CheckAsyncWorkCompletion,GRVkExtensionsconstructor.CreateRecorder(-1)sentinel, non-yielding Dawn submit constraints, callback-scoped result lifetime) againstskiasharp/binding/SkiaSharp/**. Added one correct, non-obsolete usage example on the centralSKGraphiteContexttype.Findings summary
No factual, example, or quality defects were found in the reviewed docs beyond the missing content that was filled. All fixes were placeholder fills; nothing was deferred.
Validation
dotnet cake --target=docs-format-docsreports 0/453 missing types, 0/5197 missing members, 0 findings, 0 errors. All touched XML is well-formed.