Add Agent Plugins Directory to Curated Collections - #1
Open
icidab wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds the Agent Plugins Directory to 📚 Curated Collections in both the English and Chinese READMEs, placed with the other discovery resources before the MCP-server lists.
It fits the section's purpose ("the best places to discover more agent skills and plugins"): the site indexes 658 verified Agent Plugins by fetching every candidate plugin.json from GitHub daily and checking each against the official 1.0.0 schemas from agent-plugins.org, with the counting/dedup rules published at /stats so the numbers can be audited. It also ships a free client-side validator, which fills the gap the spec leaves open in FUTURE_CONSIDERATIONS ("No test harness or validation tool is specified").
One format note, stated up front: CONTRIBUTING specifies
owner/repoGitHub links, but this entry links the website directly — the site's source repo is private, so a repo link would 404 for readers. Happy to reword or move the entry if you'd prefer a different treatment.🤖 Generated with Claude Code