Prepare for CI: Magnetic.FundamentalWave

[AHaumer]

Reducing the size of Reference Results
Similar procedure as #4775 and #4787 and #4788

[AHaumer]

Now I've worked on 44 examples {Electrical.Machines, Electrical.PowerConverters, Magnetic.FundamentalWave, Magnetic.QuasiStatic.FundamentalWave, Thermal.HeatTransfer} with size of ReferenceResult greater 10 MiB in 4 PRs:
#4775 #4787 #4788 #4789 (this one), reducing the size to 11.3%.
Thanks @maltelenz for updating the annotations in ModelicaTest.
I kindly ask the reviewers to inspect so we can proceed.

I'm unsure whether we could miss a regression:
@henrikt-ma @maltelenz I remember discussions about "extra spikes" in PowerConverters.
The example in MSL compares only two signals over the whole simulation time.
The example in ModelicaTest compares all signals but only over a short time window.

FYI: I'll be off for some time due to health reasons, don't know exactly when I'll be back.

[MatthiasBSchaefer]

The comparison of the adapted examples of Modelica.Magnetic.FundamentalWave with the existing MAP-LIB-ReferenceResults here:

https://www.ltx.de/download/MA/PR_Testing/PR4789/Modelica/testrun_report.html

and the comparison of the new examples of ModelicaTestMagnetic.FundamentalWave with the existing MAP-LIB-ReferenceResults here:
https://www.ltx.de/download/MA/PR_Testing/PR4789/ModelicaTest/testrun_report.html
Please consider that this is a comparison of new examples inside ModelicaTest with the ReferenceResults of the corresponding MODELICA examples, they are extended from.

Therefore i used a modified CSV-Comparison Tool (modelica-tools/csv-compare#80, modelica-tools/csv-compare#81)

[MatthiasBSchaefer]

looks good to me