Skip to content

Upgrade agentic Kimi model to K3 - #450

Open
hvagadia wants to merge 4 commits into
mlcommons:mainfrom
hvagadia:agent/upgrade-agentic-kimi-k3
Open

Upgrade agentic Kimi model to K3#450
hvagadia wants to merge 4 commits into
mlcommons:mainfrom
hvagadia:agent/upgrade-agentic-kimi-k3

Conversation

@hvagadia

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

  • replace Kimi K2.6 with Kimi K3 in the Agentic Inference submission guide
  • update the reference SGLang command, sampling parameters, model specifications, and accuracy thresholds
  • allow the Kimi K3 DSPARK heads for SGLang and vLLM
  • align the Kimi example YAML with the K3 workload configuration

Validation

  • loaded kimi_agentic_benchmark.yaml through BenchmarkConfig.from_yaml_file
  • uv run pre-commit run --all-files

@hvagadia
hvagadia requested a review from a team August 14, 2026 17:08
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

MLCommons CLA bot All contributors have signed the MLCommons CLA ✍️ ✅

@hvagadia
hvagadia requested a review from tianmu-li August 14, 2026 17:10
@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Aug 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (main@7935df4). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #450   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   80.45%           
=======================================
  Files           ?      150           
  Lines           ?    20211           
  Branches        ?        0           
=======================================
  Hits            ?    16261           
  Misses          ?     3950           
  Partials        ?        0           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants