Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 1: Workflow does not contain permissions#41
Conversation
…n permissions Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe GitHub Actions workflow for validating ChangesGitHub Actions Workflow Permission Configuration
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Potential fix for https://github.com/joshdev8/AutoPlexx/security/code-scanning/1
Add an explicit
permissionsblock to.github/workflows/compose-validate.ymlat the workflow root so it applies to all jobs (currently justvalidate). For this workflow, the minimal required permission is:contents: readPlace it after the
on:trigger section and beforejobs:. This preserves existing behavior while documenting and enforcing least-privilege token access. No imports, methods, or extra definitions are needed.Suggested fixes powered by Copilot Autofix. Review carefully before merging.
Summary by CodeRabbit