Maintenance 2026-05#161
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
You’ve run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (5)
WalkthroughThis PR updates project infrastructure and configurations: setup.py now uses automatic package discovery with find_packages, pyproject.toml reorganizes build-system, pytest, Ruff, and Versioningit sections, Makefile integrates pyproject-fmt formatting, and license metadata is standardized. Minor formatting adjustments are included. ChangesBuild and Development Tooling Configuration
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 3❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 2 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Tip 💬 Introducing Slack Agent: The best way for teams to turn conversations into code.Slack Agent is built on CodeRabbit's deep understanding of your code, so your team can collaborate across the entire SDLC without losing context.
Built for teams:
One agent for your entire SDLC. Right inside Slack. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
pyproject.toml (1)
94-97:⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick winAdd
.gitattributeswithexport-substforgit-archiveversioning.The
vcs.method = "git-archive"configuration withvcs.describe-subst = "$Format:%(describe:tags,match=v*)$"requires a.gitattributesfile at the repository root to enable Git export-subst substitution. Without it, archive builds will fall back tovcs.default-tag = "v0.0.0"instead of detecting the actual version.Add
.gitattributeswith:pyproject.toml export-subst🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@pyproject.toml` around lines 94 - 97, The pyproject.toml uses vcs.method = "git-archive" and vcs.describe-subst = "$Format:%(describe:tags,match=v*)$" but there is no .gitattributes to enable export-subst, so archive builds will fall back to vcs.default-tag; add a .gitattributes file at the repo root containing the line "pyproject.toml export-subst", commit it, and push so git-archive can substitute the describe value into pyproject.toml during archive builds.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Outside diff comments:
In `@pyproject.toml`:
- Around line 94-97: The pyproject.toml uses vcs.method = "git-archive" and
vcs.describe-subst = "$Format:%(describe:tags,match=v*)$" but there is no
.gitattributes to enable export-subst, so archive builds will fall back to
vcs.default-tag; add a .gitattributes file at the repo root containing the line
"pyproject.toml export-subst", commit it, and push so git-archive can substitute
the describe value into pyproject.toml during archive builds.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: f3317362-aa58-4eb8-9007-d46a37e1caad
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
CHANGELOG.mdMakefileepo_ops/models.pypyproject.tomlsetup.pytests/helpers/api_helpers.py
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #161 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 99.54% 99.54%
=======================================
Files 18 18
Lines 442 442
=======================================
Hits 440 440
Misses 2 2 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
908dad0 to
073a771
Compare
- SPDX license identifier - Find packages without warnings
This and that.