build(docs-gen): add simple extension name extractor

[makhnatkin]

Add Extension Name Extraction

• Added AST-backed extraction of editor extension names.
• Added an explicit allowlist for supported extension entry points.
• Added unit coverage for extraction and validation behavior.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide

Adds a new docs-gen CLI extractor that walks extension directories, uses the TypeScript AST to detect extension-like exports, filters them (including a blacklist and extra references), and writes a minimal extensions.json file, plus corresponding tests and npm scripts/wiring.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Introduce a standalone extension metadata extractor CLI that scans extension directories, detects real extensions via TypeScript AST analysis, filters them, and writes a minimal JSON manifest.	Define repository and docs-gen paths, extension category lists, extra extension references, and a blacklist of non-public or non-extension entries Implement directory scanning that only treats PascalCase subdirectories as extension candidates and recursively reads .ts/.tsx source files Use the TypeScript compiler API to parse source, collect exported variable declarations, and detect extension exports by type annotations, initializer shapes, or Object.assign wrappers around known extensions Compose extension name resolution logic that merges discovered extension refs with extra refs, filters via blacklist, and returns a sorted list of valid extension names Generate extension records from names and write them as extensions.json into tmp/docs-gen, with a CLI-style main() entry and shebang for direct execution	infra/docs-gen/src/extract-extension-data.mjs
Add focused tests for the extractor’s name resolution and JSON output behavior using node:test and a temporary filesystem layout.	Create temp extension directory trees with different categories and extension-like/non-extension-like source files to validate AST-based filtering and blacklist behavior Verify that listExtensionNames returns only expected extension names including extra refs and excluding blacklisted or non-extension exports Verify that writeExtensionsJson writes the expected extensions.json structure using createExtensionRecords as the source of record formatting Ensure temporary directories are cleaned up after each test run	infra/docs-gen/src/extract-extension-data.test.mjs
Wire the new extractor into the docs-gen package with dedicated scripts and dependencies.	Add an npm script to run the extension extractor and a test script that runs node --test over src/*.test.mjs Add a TypeScript dependency (via catalog:ts) required by the extractor’s AST usage Update pnpm-lock.yaml to capture the new dependency graph	infra/docs-gen/package.json pnpm-lock.yaml

Possibly linked issues

• #: PR delivers the first deterministic extractor (extension names), directly advancing the requested extension docs pipeline.

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
  review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
  @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
  want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
  (re-)generate the summary at any time.
• Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
  request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
• Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
  pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
  addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
• Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
  request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
  want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
  @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey - I've found 1 issue

Prompt for AI Agents

Please address the comments from this code review:

## Individual Comments

### Comment 1
<location path="infra/docs-gen/src/extract-extension-data.mjs" line_range="201-41" />
<code_context>
+    writeExtensionsJson();
+}
+
+if (process.argv[1] && fileURLToPath(import.meta.url) === process.argv[1]) {
+    main();
+}
</code_context>
<issue_to_address>
**issue (bug_risk):** The CLI entry-point check may fail depending on how the script is invoked (relative vs absolute path, Windows path differences).

Directly comparing `fileURLToPath(import.meta.url)` with `process.argv[1]` is brittle because `argv[1]` may be relative while `fileURLToPath` is absolute, and path string formats differ across platforms. Consider normalizing both sides, e.g. `if (process.argv[1] && import.meta.url === pathToFileURL(process.argv[1]).href)` or comparing `resolve(process.argv[1])` to `fileURLToPath(import.meta.url)` so `main()` reliably runs when the script is invoked via `node path/to/extract-extension-data.mjs`.
</issue_to_address>

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[sourcery-ai]

issue (bug_risk): The CLI entry-point check may fail depending on how the script is invoked (relative vs absolute path, Windows path differences).

Directly comparing fileURLToPath(import.meta.url) with process.argv[1] is brittle because argv[1] may be relative while fileURLToPath is absolute, and path string formats differ across platforms. Consider normalizing both sides, e.g. if (process.argv[1] && import.meta.url === pathToFileURL(process.argv[1]).href) or comparing resolve(process.argv[1]) to fileURLToPath(import.meta.url) so main() reliably runs when the script is invoked via node path/to/extract-extension-data.mjs.

[gravity-ui]

[gravity-ui]