Suggestion to move HTTP wg to July 22nd#412
Merged
Merged
Conversation
benjie
reviewed
Jul 15, 2026
Member
|
Rather than renaming the file, which will cause a new file to be created the next time the scripts run, create a new file for the new date/time and update the existing file to note it has been rescheduled. 22nd should work for me. I can't do 23rd or 30th. |
4beab8c to
075c7fa
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
Date adjusted in the calendar link and old file kept around. PS: we'll also need to update the Google calendar. |
Member
|
Yep, assuming this is merged before tomorrow that'll come up automatically in my Thursday scripts. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I won't be able to attend 30th of July and I think @benjie neither but there are things to discuss these days. Suggestion to move to 22nd of July.
I've added a couple of items to the agenda. @michaelstaib might be worth adding variable batching as well?
Ping @benjie @Shane32 @michaelstaib