Add QUERY verb#411
Conversation
…the server wording
* Restore important guidance and recommend support for Accept:application/json * Reword sentence to make the exclusion clear * Clarify another paragraph * Clarify * Non-normative recommendation of application/json for successful legacy requests * Legacy can use any 2xx status code * Consistent order * Trim extraneous text
|
How about a bit more DRY? For example:
Then any future changes to the POST requirements are inherited by the QUERY requirements. Or are there more differences? |
There is one difference in the paragraph that But that's something you call out at the beginning of your version. I think the "condensed" part is easier to read and maintain but is a bit less clear. Both work for me. |
See https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc10008.html and ecosystem adoption
QUERYis an idempotent cacheable request with a body that maps quite well to GraphQL queries.This is based off #404, do not merge before the other PR is merged.
This editorial duplicates a bit of text but since this is a spec and not a novel, I'd rather have duplication than missing information. Maybe the JSON encoding part could be factored in but not sure how.